:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:軍校新生之學習與讀書策略及其相關因素研究--以中正理工學院為例
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:鄧宜男
作者(外文):Teng, Yi-nan
出版日期:2000
卷期:9
頁次:頁57-87
主題關鍵詞:軍校新生學習策略學業成績家庭導師Military academyFreshmanLearning and study strategyAcademic achievementHost-tutor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:55
本研究旨在瞭解軍校新生之學習與讀書策略,藉前後測之比較檢視軍校新生學習與讀書策略的改變,並進而探討學習與讀書策略與學業成績及心理健康的關係。本研究以中正理工學院87學年度入學之所有新生爲研究對象,有效樣本爲368人,以「大學生學習與讀書策略量表」、「曾氏心理健康量表」及學生之學業成績爲評量工具,研究結果如下:1.軍校新生的學習與讀書策略前後測有顯著差異。「大學生學習與讀書策略」各分量表普遍都是後測分數高於前測,僅「學習態度」分量表是前測分數高於後測。2.軍校一年級大學生與專科生,無論在學習與讀書策略前測或後測均沒有太大差異。整體看來,雖然學制不同,學科内容稍異,專科生與大學生之間的學習與讀書策略差異並不太大。3.軍校新生的學習與讀書策略前測與上學期學業總成績不太相關。4.軍校新生的學習與讀書策略後測與上下學期學業總成績皆有顯著正相關。5.軍校新生的學習與讀書策略與心理健康之間呈正相關。6.有無家庭導師對新生的學習與讀書策略之「動機」、「焦慮」、「專心」、「選擇要點」、「自我測驗」五個分量表會有所影響。且有家庭導師的學生在五個分量表的表現都優於無家庭導師者。値得繼續實施家庭導師制。根據研究結果,提出建議,以供教育相關人士作爲學習輔導之參考,及進一步研究的依據。
The study aimed to investigate the freshmen’s learning and study strategies at Chung-Cheng Institute of Technology (CCIT)- a military academy. For the first research purpose, the comparison of pretest and posttest was conducted to identify the freshmen’s change of learning and study strategies during the freshman-year at a military academy. The second purpose was to examine the correlations between learning and study strategies and academic achievement, as well as learning and study strategies and mental health respectively. The subjects were all the freshmen of CCIT in 1998. There were 368 useable questionnaires obtained. The instruments were Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) for undergraduates, and Zung’s self-administrated Anxiety Scale (S.A.S.) & Zung’s self-administrated Depression Scale (S.D.S.). Findings of the study were as following: 1 .There were significant differences between pretest and posttest on the level of learning and study strategies. Generally speaking, the subscales5 degrees of posttest were better than those of posttest except one (of eleven subscales) — “learning attitude” subscale. 2. There were no significant interactions between cadets of two-year system and four-year system on the LASSI pretest’s and posttest’s level. Generally speaking, the LASSI level of cadets on two-year system and four-year system were very similar. 3. There was no significant correlation between the LASSI pretest and academic achievement of the first semester.4. There were significant correlations between the LASSI posttest and academic achievement of the second semester; so were between the LASSI posttest and academic achievement of the first semester. 5. It is strongly correlated between the LASSI posttest and cadets’ mental health. 6. The “host tutor system” showed freshmen’s significant improvement on five of eleven LASSI subscales. They were motivation, anxiety, concentration, selecting key points and self-examination. Obviously, those who joined the host tutor system performed better than those who didn't on the five subscales. Suggestions for study guidance and future research were provided based on the findings of the study.
期刊論文
1.簡茂發、洪寶蓮(19900100)。國中學生個人及環境因素與其學習行為的關係之研究。測驗年刊,37,181-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張新仁、簡茂發(19830100)。國中學生學習行為之研究。測驗年刊,30,75-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張學聆(19951200)。私立專科生學習策略與學業成就間關係之研究--以崇右企專為例。崇右學報,5,111-144。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧宜男(2000)。導師制度對大專軍校新生學業成績與心理健康的影響--以中正理工學院為例。中正嶺學術研究集刊,19,171-199。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pressley, M.(1995)。More about the development of self-regulation: Complex, long-term, and thoroughly social。Educational Psychologist,30(4),207-212。  new window
6.李咏吟、張德榮、洪寶蓮(19920100)。大學生學習與讀書策略量表之修訂報告。測驗年刊,39,117-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陸偉明(19950900)。學生學習及讀書策略初探。筧橋學報,2,185-198。  延伸查詢new window
8.林邦傑(19950100)。我國國小、國中、高中學生學習及讀書策略之比較分析。測驗年刊,42,349-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.鄧宜男(19991200)。軍校導師與隊職官輔導效能之比較研究--以中正理工學院為例。中華輔導學報,7,31-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.朱美珍(19980600)。軍校學生人際關係與生活適應之研究--以政戰學校為例。復興崗學報,63,149-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李咏吟、張德榮、陳慶福、林本喬、韓楷檉(19931200)。國中生學習與讀書策略及其相關因素之研究。中華輔導學報,1,58-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.楊宗德(19980900)。政治作戰學校正期班新生學校生活適應與人格特質之分析研究。復興崗學報,64,253-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.邱上真(19910700)。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報,1,1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.郭國禎(19860300)。我國大專學生求助需欲與求助態度之調查研究。輔導學報,9,165-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.楊國樞(19730300)。國中學生的心理物質與學業成就。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,35,41-86。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳李綢(19950600)。「學習策略訓練方案」對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。教育心理學報,28,77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.馮蓉珍(1993)。國立屏東商專新生輔導需求之研究。國立屏東商業技術學院學報,1,209-231。  延伸查詢new window
18.謝明昆(1988)。大學新生定向輔導研究。新竹師院學報,2,175-276。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Simpson, M. L.(1996)。Conducting Reality Checks to Improve Students' Strategic Learning。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,40(20),102-110。  new window
20.Stahl, N. A.、Simpson, M. L.、Hayes, C. G.(1992)。Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students。Journal of Development Education,19,2-11。  new window
21.Winoagad, P. N.、Winograd, P. N.(1984)。Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts。Reading Research Quarterly,19,404-425。  new window
22.曾淑貞、呂尚芝(1995)。臺南師院大一新生生活適應問題之調查研究。臺南師院學生學刊,16,77-101。  延伸查詢new window
23.鄧宜男(1999)。教學系統設計模式之初探與改良。中正嶺學術研究集刊,18,139-170。  延伸查詢new window
24.Armbruster, B. B.、Anderson, T. H.(1987)。Does text structure summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository test。Reading Research Quarterly,22,331-346。  new window
25.Deshler, Donald D.、Lenz, B. K.(1989)。The strategies instructional approach。International Journal of Disabilities, Development, and Education,36(3),203-224。  new window
26.Gadzella, B. M.(1985)。Research brief: study skills presented through computer-assisted instruction to high school students。Texas Tech Journal of Education,12,47-50。  new window
27.Knight, J.(1993)。Learning strategies go to college。Preventing School Failure,38(1),36-43。  new window
28.Nist, S. L.(1993)。What the literature says about academic literacy。Georgia Journal of Reading,19,11-18。  new window
29.Pressley, M.、Harris, K.、Marks, M. B.(1992)。But good strategy instructors are constructivists!。Educational Psychology Review,4(1),3-31。  new window
會議論文
1.陳大仁(2000)。民間大學與軍事學校之特性比較分析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Ribich, F. D.(1977)。Memory for a lecture: Effects of an advance organizer and levels of processing on semantic and episodic memory,Carbondale。  new window
圖書
1.李咏吟(1997)。學習輔導-學習心理學的應用。台北市:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林一真(1994)。醫學院新生定向輔導具體措施細部規劃研究。教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Weinstein, C. E.(1987)。Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI): User's manual。H & H Publishing Company。  new window
4.孫敏華(1990)。權威性格與自我統整之研究:文武大學生之比較。大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mayer, Richard E.(1987)。Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach。Don Mills:HaperCollins Publisher。  new window
6.Gagné, Robert Mills(1985)。The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction。Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.。  new window
7.林建平(1997)。學習輔導:理論與實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lefrançois, Guy R.、李茂興(1998)。教學心理學。弘智。  延伸查詢new window
9.Schallert, D. L.、Alexander, P. A.、Gortz, E. T.(1988)。Implicit instruction of strategies for learning from text。Learning and study strategies。San Diego, CA。  new window
10.Simpson, M. L.、Nist, S. L.(1992)。A case study of academic literacy tasks and their negotiation in a university history class。Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives。Chicago, IL。  new window
11.林清山(1997)。有效學習的方法。有效學習的方法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Johnson, E. J.(1988)。Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process。The Nature of Expertise。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
13.Mayer, R. E.(1988)。Learning strategy: An overview。Learning and Strategies: Issues in assessment instruction, and evaluation。N. Y.。  new window
其他
1.鄧宜男(1996)。軍校學生生活適應調查研究-以中正理工學院為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE