2000年雪梨奧運會，跆拳道運動首度列入正式比賽項目。然而跆拳道運動裁判判定得分缺乏客觀標準，裁判不公久為人詬病，乃是眾所皆知的事實，亦是至今仍存在的現象。杵研究試圖從國際正式比賽中，瞭解國際裁判判定得分與選手實際得分其間之差異。以2000年第六屆世異大學跆拳道錦標賽各場比賽為研究對象，結果獲得以下結論。 裁判判定得分的確存在著誤差，從每場選手的實際平均得為為4.2分，其第一回合與第二回合的平均得分皆為1.5分，第三回合為1.4分；與裁判在每場比賽中判定得分的平均分數為5.2分，三回合中的平均判定得分依序為1.81分、1.77分及1.81分，兩者之間明顯有落差存在。每場比賽裁判判定得分分數與選手實際得分分數之差異分數，平均皆數高達14分，其每場比賽中三位裁判誤分數之總計，次數最多的是介於13∼15分之間。

　　　　　Though Teakwondo has been listed as a formal competition item for the first time in Sydney 2000 Olympics, it is a well-know fact that, due to the lack of objective criteria, the referees' judgement has long been criticized. This study aims to view the difference between the score given by the referees and the actual score gained by the contestants in formal international contests. The 6th world University Taekwondo Championship held in the National Chung-shan University in Kaohsinung in 2000 is selected to access for the related data. The study shows that differences exist in the referees' scoring process. The average score gained by the contestant is 4.2, in which the average score gained by the contestant is 4.2, in which the average score of the first round and the second round is 1.5, and 1.4 for the third round. However, the average score given by the referee at each contest is 5.2, and there average scores given for the three rounds are 1.81, 1.77 and 1.81, the difference does exist. The average of difference between the score given by the referee and the actual score gained by the contestant in each contest is as high as 14, and the total of the score difference of the three referees of each contest is between 13 and 15.