This thesis focuses on reaearch on the Buddhist literature features of the Six Dynasties and summarize them based on formality, style, and content. The so-called "Buddhist literature", according to Jiady Judin from Japan, is "only when we tranform our religious experiences and beliefs into literature compositions for criticisms or admiration can we claim what common Buddhist literature is." He also believes that analogy or saying of Buddhist scriptures is not of pure Buddhist literature. "It's just an easy-to-read way of explaination. It aims at comprehending religious principles but doesn't belong to the world of Buddhist listerature" From Mr. Judin's claim, we can conclue that Buddhist literature is more of a narrow sense that covering Buddhist scriptures. In addition, Mr. Shu-Dro Jiang said: "Buddhist literature can be the sum of Buddhist literature and pro-Buddhist literature. "Pro-Buddhist literature is" the literature compositions created by literators and who want to preach, protect, and show their admiration and praises towards Buddhism. But it doesn's include Buddhist scriptures and its range in content is narrower" Mr. Jiang's definition of Buddhist literature, in contrast to Mr. Judin, is broader in sense. In this thesis, the author summarizes all the above-mentioned literators' different opinions towards Buddhism and extends them to a broader definition to interpret the Buddhist literature featuers of the poetry of the Six Dynasties. Of all poetry of the Six Dynasties influeced by Buddhism, these compositions present Buddhist literature features mor or less. Therefore, this thesis does not extensively state the literature features of the poetry of the Six Dynasties but makes a discussion over the poetry of the Six Dynasties with Buddhism colors. The first chapter cuts to the point from the historical backgroung and explains the exteral factors of the poetry. The latter two indicate the formality, style and content of the poetry with Buddhist literature features.