:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大專身心障礙學生之生活品質研究
書刊名:特殊教育學報
作者:張英鵬
作者(外文):Chang, Ying Peng
出版日期:2001
卷期:15
頁次:頁273-307
主題關鍵詞:大專院校身心障礙學生生活品質個人與家庭College students with disabilitiesQuality of life
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(22) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:22
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:108
     本研究旨在探討就讀大專院校身心障礙學生生活品質符合與重要性情形。以自編以「生品質評量問卷」為工具針對440位受試調查。主要結果如下: 就業、求學及婚姻為最大壓力,最不滿意的感情生活及人際互動為異性之愛。解決困難對象以家人為主,心事傾吐對象以朋友為主。 依障礙類型、障礙程度、性別、學程階段、學校類型、學校性質六個向度分析生活品質情形,發現實際符合程度(客觀性)大多小於重要性感受(主觀性),表示大專身心障礙學生之生活品質多不理想。在生活品質五個向度的符點情形不理想情形依序為「個人與社會互動」、「社會接納」、「獨立性」、「個人生活」,而以「居住環境」較佳。 根據研究結果,提出可行建議,供學校、政府部門及身心障礙家庭參考。
     This research examined the quality of life for university and college students with disabilities, and form the self-edited "Questionnaire for Quality of Life measurement" to survey on 440 subjects. Its main results as follows: Employment, attend school and marriage for the biggest pressure, solve the difficult object regarding family members as lord, the worry pour out the object regarding friend as lord. According to the handicapped type, handicapped degree, sex, phase of learning, school type, kinds of school to analyze quality of life situation, discover match degree (objectivity) smaller concernment feel (subjective), the quality of life for college students with disabilities show impractical. At five dimensions of quality of life that not quite ideal through order degree by ascending is "interactive with individual and the society", "the society accept", "independence", "individual life", and "live environment" more better. According to results, provide suggestions to school, government and family of handicapped.
期刊論文
1.張英鵬(19990600)。近十年(78-87)我國特殊教育安置與設班變遷之分析。屏東師院學報,12,251-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Landesman, S.(1986)。Quality of life and personal life satisfaction: definition and measurement issues。Mental Retardation,24,141-143。  new window
3.Hughes, C.、Hwang, B.、Kim, J. H.、Eisenman, L. T.、Killian, D. J.(1995)。Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures。American Journal on Mental Retardation,99(6),623-641。  new window
4.Felce, D.、Perry, J.(1995)。Quality of life: its definition and measurement。Research in Developmental Disabilities,16(1),51-74。  new window
5.鈕文英、陳靜江(19990600)。臺灣地區智能障礙青年「心理生活素質」之研究。特殊教育學報,13,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.孫淑柔(19970300)。從智能障礙者生活品質評量的趨勢談質的研究的可行性。特殊教育季刊,62,10-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Halpern, A. S.(1993)。Quality of life as a conceptual framework for evaluating transition outcomes。Exceptional Children,59(6),486-498。  new window
8.萬明美、張照明、陳麗君(19970600)。大學視覺障礙學生學校生活適應及大學同儕對其態度之研究。特殊教育學報,12,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張英鵬(1994)。智障者生活品質之評量。特殊教育季刊,51,29-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Nisbet, J.、Vincent, L.(1986)。The difference in inappropriate behavior and instructional interactions in sheltered and nonsheltered work environments。The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps,11(1),19-27。  new window
11.Rowitz, L.(1989)。Trends in Mental Retardation in the 1990s。Mental Retardation,27,3-5。  new window
12.Schalock, R. L.、Jensen, C. M.(1986)。Assessing the goodness-of-fit between persons and their environment。Journal of the Association for Persons with severe Handicaps,11,103-109。  new window
13.Schalock, R. L.、Lilley, M. A.(1986)。Placement from community-based mental retardation programs: How well do clients do after 8-10 years?。American Journal of Mental Deficiency,90,669-676。  new window
會議論文
1.林宏熾(1995)。特殊教育的新課題:傷殘人士生活素質之探討與展望。臺北。449-496。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張勝成(1998)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「學校生活素質」之研究(II)。臺北:行政國家科學委員會/國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.林宏熾(1997)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「社區生活素質」之研究(I)。彰化。  延伸查詢new window
3.許天威、蕭金土(1997)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「職業生活素質」之研究(I)。彰化。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳靜江、鈕文英(1997)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年心理生活素質之研究(I)。沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張勝成(1997)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「學校生活素質」之研究(I)。彰化。  延伸查詢new window
6.林宏熾(1999)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「社區生活素質」之研究(III):感官或肢體障礙青年之社區生活素質。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何慧玥(1993)。大專聽覺障礙學生學校生活適應之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶貴、錡寶香(1991)。聽覺障礙學生升學輔導與安置措施之研究。臺北:教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳武典(1991)。肢體障礙學生升學輔導與安置措施之研究。台北:教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.許天威(1984)。大專院校盲(聾)學生輔導制度成效之研究。彰化:國立台灣教育學院特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
4.Andrews, Frank M.、Withey, Stephen B.(1976)。Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality。Plenum Press。  new window
5.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Rodgers, Willard L.(1976)。The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions。Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
6.Blunden, R.(1988)。Programmatic features of quality services。Community residences for persons with developmental disabilities。Baltimore, MD。  new window
7.Borthwick-Duffy, S. A.(1990)。Quality of life of persons with sever or profound mental retardation。Quality of life: Perspectives and issues。Washington, DC。  new window
8.Keith, K. D.、Schalock, R. L.、Hoffman, K.(1986)。Quality of life: Measurement and programmatic implications。Quality of life: Measurement and programmatic implications。Lincoln, NE。  new window
9.Matson, J. L.、Rusch, F. R.(1986)。Quality of life: Does competitive employment make a difference?。Competitive employment issues and strategies。Baltimore, MD。  new window
10.Schalock, R. L.、Conroy, J. W.、Feinstein, C. S.、Lemanowicz, J. A.(1991)。An investigative study of the correlates of quality of life。An investigative study of the correlates of quality of life。沒有紀錄。  new window
11.Schalock, R. L.、Keith, K. D.、Hoffman, K.(1990)。1990 Quality of life questionnaire: Standardization Manual。1990 Quality of life questionnaire: Standardization Manual。Hastings, NE。  new window
12.Thorndike, E. L.(1939)。Your city。Your city。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Goode, D.(1990)。Thinking about and discussing quality of life。Quality of life: Perspectives and issues。Washington, DC:American Association of Mental Retardation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE