:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:汽車貨物運輸業成本結構與相關彈性之分析
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:王小娥許凱翔
作者(外文):Wang, Shaw-erHsu, Kai-hsiang
出版日期:2001
卷期:30:3
頁次:頁603-633
主題關鍵詞:汽車貨物運輸業成本函數密度經濟解除管制Motor carrier industryCost functionEconomies of densityDeregulation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:33
台灣經濟快達成長,道路交通網路日益發達,公路之汽車貨物運輸業已成為主要之內陸貨運工具。但長期以來國內有關公路汽車貨物運輸業成本結構及相關問題之研究分析幾告闕如,因此本研究以較彈性化之Translog成本函數型態建立汽車貨運業與汽車路線貨運素之成本函數,並進行相關經濟指標之分析,並進一步檢討政府相關管制政策及費率訂定之合理性。 本研究以民國86年之汽車貨運業(整車)斷面資料及民國的80-86年八家汽車路線貨運業(零擔)之經緯資料4進行實證分析,分析主要結論如下:1.造成台灣汽車貨運業成本結構不同的主要因素為平均載運長度(營運範圍),而非如國外之貨運收入或產出,故本研究依據平均載運長度將汽車貨運業區分為短程、中程與長程運輸官司。2.汽車貨運索與汽車路線貨運業都具有密度經濟或輕微密度經濟。3.油料價格變動對汽車貨運業成本影響最大,勞動價格變動則對汽車路線貨運業成本影響最大。4.汽車貨運業與汽車路線貨運業都具有載運長度經濟與載運噸數經濟(但前者中之中程與長程運輸官司載運長度經濟較不明顯),表示業者應提高載運長度與載運噸數。5.由汽車貨運素之密度經濟、邊際成本與平均成本關係發現法定運價高於均衡運慣,導致業者削價競爭,建議政層對於汽車貨運業費率管制應予解除。6.汽車路線黨雖屬於寡占市場,但僅具有輕微密度經濟,因此費率管制可採核備制,由主管機關接准上限價格,給予業者經營彈性。
The rapid economic growth and increase in highway investment in the past few decades have resulted in significant development of motor carrier industry and made it the most dominant inland freight transportation mode in Taiwan. Unfortunately, the cost structures of both domestic Truckload(TL) and Less-Than-Truckload(LTL) motor carriers in Taiwan have never been carefully investigated. Therefore, this study aims to develop a flexible translog cost functions for these carriers and to analyze their economic characteristics (ex. economies of density, elasticity of output, elasticity of input price, average cost and marginal cost). With these economic characteristics, we can interpret the current situation of the TL and LTL markets; moreover we can examine if regulated policies made for two carriers are suitable. Empirical analyses were performed using 1997 cross-section data for TL motor carriers, and the panel data(1991-1997)for LTL motor carriers. The major findings include: (1) The main factor causing the significant difference in the cost structure for TL is average length-of-haul, rather than total revenues or tonnage carries as in other countries; (2) TL has economies of density” while LTL has only weαk economies of density; (3) Among factors of input, fuel price has the most significant influence on TL’s cost, while labor price on LTL’s; (4) Both LTL and TL have evidence of economies of load size and length-of-haul (but only short haul TL has significant economies of length-of-haul); (5) The regulated price of TL is found to be higher than the equilibrium price from the analysis of their density economies, marginal cost and average cost. This has led to the cutthroat price competition among TL carriers, and so the price of TL should be deregulated; (6) Since LTL has only weak economies of density, A price ceiling with considerable downward flexibility in fares policy can be used.
期刊論文
1.Friedlaender, A. F.、Chiang, S. J. W.(1983)。Productivity Growth in the Regulated Trucking Industry。Research in Transportation and Economics,1,149-184。  new window
2.Willig, R. D.、Panzar, J. C.(1981)。Economies of Scope。The American Economic Review,71(2),268-272。  new window
3.王小娥、吳雅音(1993)。臺鐵多元產出成本結構之分析。運輸計劃季刊,22(3),259-290。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Daughety, Andrew F.、Nelson, Forrest D.(1988)。An Econometric Analysis of Changes in the Cost and Production Structure of the Trucking Industry, 1953-1982。The Review of Economics and Statistics,70(1),67-75。  new window
5.Ying, John S.(1990)。Regulatory Reform and Technical Change: New Evidence of Scale Economies in Trucking。Southern Economic Journal,56(4),996-1009。  new window
6.Gagne, Robert(1990)。On the Relevant Elasticity Estimates for Cost Structure Analyses of the Trucking Industry。The Review of Economics and Statistics,72(1),160-164。  new window
7.Harmatuck, Donald J.(1991)。Economies of Scale and Scope in the Motor Carrier Industry。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,135-151。  new window
8.Christensen, Laurits R.、Huston, John H.(1986)。A Reexamination of the Cost Structure for Specialized Motor Carriers。The Logistics and Transportation Review,23(4),339-351。  new window
9.Harmatuck, Donald J.(1992)。Motor Carrier Cost Function Comparisons。Transportation Journal,31(4),31-46。  new window
10.Harmatuck, Donald J.(1981)。A Motor Carrier Joint Cost Function。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,15(2),135-153。  new window
11.王小娥、Friedlaender, Ann F.(1984)。Output Aggregation, Network Effects, and the Measurement of Trucking Technology。The Review of Economics and Statistics,66(2),267-276。  new window
12.Harmatuck, Donald J.(1985)。Short Run Motor Carrier Cost Function for Five Large Common Carriers。The Logistics and Transportation Review,21(3),217-223。  new window
學位論文
1.許凱翔(2000)。汽車貨物運輸業成本函數之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blomquist, John D.(1993)。The Effect of Deregulation on Motor Carrier firms and Drivers,0。  new window
圖書
1.Caves, D. W.、Christensen, L. R.、Tretheway, M. W.、Windle, R.(1985)。Network effects and the measurement of returns to scale and density for U. S. Railroads。Analytical Studies in Transport Economics。Cambridge。  new window
2.林正章、王小娥、陳春益(1999)。公路汽車貨運運價準則檢討修訂之研究。公路汽車貨運運價準則檢討修訂之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇雄義、李宗儒、蔡智發(1998)。公路汽車貨運現況問題及運價準則之檢討研究。公路汽車貨運現況問題及運價準則之檢討研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top