:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:終端使用者詞彙選用與概念一致性之研究--以臺灣大學學生使用PsycLIT光碟資料庫為例
書刊名:圖書資訊學刊
作者:黃慕萱 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Mu-hsuan
出版日期:2001
卷期:16
頁次:頁67-99
主題關鍵詞:資訊檢索詞彙選擇檢索詞彙檢索概念一致性Information retrievalTerm selectionsSearch termsSearch conceptsConsistency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:18
     本文主要探討光碟資料庫終端使用者選用詞彙概念的一致性,及其與檢索結果之關係。本研究以國立臺灣大學學生為研究對象,以PsycLIT光碟資料庫為檢索系統,總計有10個檢索問題,分別由31位檢索者進行59個題次的光碟檢索,總計產生609個檢索詞彙。本研究詞彙選擇一致性在第一層次上是22.14%,第二層次上是35%,與前人研究結果差異不大;在檢索概念上,本研究所得之檢索詞彙概念一致性偏低,且越到較後的層次差距越大。至於檢索結果的部分,本研究無論就檢出書目或判斷相關書目之重複性均較前人研究低,且重複性減少。
     Thia article analyzes the consistency in the selection of search terms and search contents of college and graduate students in National Taiwan University when they are using PsycLIT CD-ROM database. 31 students conducted pre-assigned searches, doing 59 searches generating 609 search terms. The study finds the consistency in selection of search terms of first level is 22.14% and second level is 35%. These results are similar with others' researches. About the consistency in search concepts, no matter the overlaps of searched articles or judge relevant articles are lower than other researches.
期刊論文
1.Spink, A.、Saracevic, Tefko(1997)。Interaction in Information Retrieval: Selection and Effectiveness of Search Terms。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,48(8),741-761。  new window
2.Fidel, Raya(1987)。What is Missing in Research about Online Searching Behavior?。The Canadian Journal of Information Science,12(3)/12(4),54-61。  new window
3.Harter, Stephen P.(1990)。Search Term Combinations and Retrieval Overlap: A Proposed Methodology and Case Study。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(2),132-146。  new window
4.Saracevic, Tefko、Kantor, Paul、Chamis, A. Y.、Trivison, D.(1988)。A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. I. Background and Methodology。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,39(3),161-176。  new window
5.Keyes, John G.(1986)。Using Conceptual Categories of Questions to Measure Differences in Retrieval Performance。Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Inforamtion Science,33,238。  new window
6.Saracevic, Tefko、Kantor, Paul(1988)。A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving.Ⅲ.Searchers, Searches, and Overlap.。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,39(3),199。  new window
7.Iivonen, Mirja(1995)。Consistency in The Selection of Search Concept and Search Terms。Information Processing and Management,31(2),180-185。  new window
會議論文
1.Iivonen, Mirja。Completing of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods: Example from a Consistency Study149-160。  new window
2.Fidel, Raya(1985)。Individual Variability in Online Search Behavior。White Plains, NY。69-72。  new window
3.Saracevic, Tefko、Baxter, Matthew A.(1983)。On a Method for Studying the Structure and Nature of Requests in Information Retrieval20,22-25。  new window
4.Bellardo, Trudi、Saracevic, Tefko(1987)。Online Searching and Search Output: Relationships between Overlap, Relevance, Recall and Precision11。  new window
研究報告
1.黃慕萱(1998)。檢索問題、檢索詞彙及心智模型對資訊尋求和資訊檢索之影響研究 (計畫編號:NSC87-2415-H002-047)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳佳君(1996)。檢索詞彙來源與檢索詞彙效益之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Harter, Stephen P.(1986)。Online Information Retrieval: Concepts, Principles, and Techniques。Orlando, Florida。  new window
其他
1.Saracevic, Tefko,Baxter, Matthew A.(1984)。Measuring the Degree of Agreement between Searchers,White Plains, N. Y.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top