:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:羅斯的「初適責任」
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:田宜芳
作者(外文):Tien, I-fang
出版日期:2001
卷期:28:11=330
頁次:頁988-996+1077
主題關鍵詞:羅斯初適責任真正責任直覺主義義務論者後設倫理學William David RossPrima facie dutyActual dutyIntuitionismDeontologistMeta-ethics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
     著名的亞理士多德學者大衛.羅斯 (Sir David Ross, 1877-1971)在當代倫理學上是一個「義務論者」(Deontologist),主張吾人之遵守道德是做人的責任,而非為了任何功利或效益——此一思想,近於漢儒董仲舒的「正其誼不謀其利,明其道不計其功。」 本文將依據他的主要著作《正確與良善》(The Right and the Good, 1930) 和《倫理學的基礎》(Foundations of Ethics, 1939),來探討其在當代倫理學裏頗為重要的概念「初適責任」(Prima Facie Duty) 。本文之敘述,將以「由小而大」的方式,首先詮釋羅斯所主張的「初適責任」的意義,並列出其種類,然後探討他的道德理論,最後談論羅斯在當代倫理學的地位。
The well-known Aristotelian scholar Sir David Ross (1877-1971) is a Deontologist in contemporary ethics. He claims that the observance of morality is one's responsibility as a human being, not for any utility or effect. Such a concept is similar to the idea of Dong Zhongshu, a preeminent Confucian in the Han Dynasty--“Doing the right thing without utilitarian considerations.” This paper is based on Ross's major works, The Right and the Good (1930) and Foundations of Ethics (1939), discussing the most important concepts of his moral theory--Prima Facie Duty. The argument of this article will first interpret the meaning of Prima Facie Duty, then discuss his moral theory, and finally talk about Ross's role in contemporary ethics.
期刊論文
1.Atwell, John(1978)。Ross and Prima Facie Duties。Ethics,88(3),240-249。  new window
圖書
1.Ross, W. D.(1939)。Foundations of Ethics。Oxford。  new window
2.Edward, Paul(1968)。The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Vol. 7)。New York。  new window
3.Ross, William David(2002)。The Right and the Good。Oxford。  new window
4.Warnock, G. J.(1967)。Contemporary Moral Philosophy。London:Macmillan。  new window
5.Moore, George Edward(1903)。Principia Ethica。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Feldman, Fred(1978)。Ross’s Formalism。Ethics。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey。  new window
7.Prichard, H. A.(1952)。Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?。Readings in Ethical Theory。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE