:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:雙溪鄉人力互助健康照顧制度之先驅研究
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:林玲雯鄭惠美
作者(外文):Lin, Ling-wenJeng, Huey-meei
出版日期:2001
卷期:16
頁次:頁155-177
主題關鍵詞:人力互助社區行動研究志工老人Mutual-helpCommunityAction researchVolunteerElders
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究旨在瞭解人力互助健康照顧制度之建立,對鄉村社區中老年人在社區服務參與意願、社區參與的心理需求層次及執行健康生活的影響。本研究以參與式行動研究為主要研究方法,由研究者和研究地區之民眾共同進行建立互助服務網路,並立意選取台北縣雙溪鄉為研究地區,以五十五歲以上之人口數為研究母群體,以社區志工實際進行社區服務,介入時間為期三個月。共計取得242份完整資料進行量性分析,研究進行過程中並收集質性資料,以輔助量性資料之不足。 研究結果發現:(1)介入後,研究對象健康生活行為有顯著改變;社區服務參與意願以男性的參與意願改變較為顯著;社區參與的心理需求層次有向上提昇的效果。(2)社區參與的心理需求層次與對人力互助制度之看法並不因社會人口學特徵的不同而有不同,但社區參與的心理需求愈高者認為人力互助制度是需要的,且期望能夠實施。(3)研究對象及社區志工對人力互助制度的建立有偏向正向肯定的評價,且得到行政單位、民間團體的支持、中老年民眾的肯定及社區人士不斷加入,人力互助制度在雙溪鄉實施的評價良好是可以繼續經營的模式。 分析本研究建立之人力互助健康照顧制度在雙溪鄉進行之情形有下列幾點值得提出;介入後發現志工為中老年民眾提供服務的比率有增加的趨勢,有必要加強志工的訓練,提升保健基本能力;研究進行過程中面臨最大困難是提供服務者人數不足的問題,介入後期獲得行政單位及民間組織的支持,廣召熱心人士共同參與,對早期志工有鼓舞作用;提供服務的社區志工在服務中不斷學習及成長,不但得到民眾的讚美,也對自己從事社區服務更有信心,且也認為這是一個有意義值得繼續推行的制度;從介入前後證實人力互助制度的實施對中老年人的健康行為有實質上的助益。
The purposes of this research are to exam the effect of the establishment of the mutual-help system of health-care on the elders’ willingness and the level of psychological need of community services participation, and to exam how the health life execution in rural community influences on rural community. Shuang-shi Shiang in Taipei County was selected as the research setting. Made the elders above the age of 55 as the whole research target, and the community volunteers did the health services lasted for 3 months. There were 242 subjects who completed pre-test and post-test questionnaires. Also, the qualitative research method was used because qualitative research could not reflect the deeper health-care problems. The main results of this research were as follows:(1)After the intervention, the subjects has significant improvement in health life behaviors. Male subjects, especially, had more improvement in willingness of community services participation than female. The effect of psychological level in community participation was also elevated. (2) The effect of demographic factors on psychological level in community participation and opinions in mutual-help system were not consistent. Subjects who had higher psychological level in community participation were more likely to require & expect execution of the mutual-help system. (3) Host subjects and community volunteers welcomed the establishment of mutual-help system. Also it got support from the administrative departments, local civil groups, the elders and members in the community. The mutual-help system of health-care in Shuang-shi Shiang was highly praised It may also be good model for other communities. There are several important nations found from the research process. (1) It was necessary to enhance medical training for community volunteers. (2) The insufficiency of volunteers was the biggest barrier in this study. (3) The volunteers who provided services in the community could keep learning and being more mature. They not only received praise from the elders, but also became more confident in giving community services. The volunteers considered the mutual-help system as a good policy that could be continued. (4) The mutual-help system was proved a helpful system which can enhance the elders’ health behaviors.
期刊論文
1.朱美珍(19950300)。由人力資源網絡論社區意識的凝聚。社區發展季刊,69,67-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林東龍、范麗娟(19980900)。高齡志工角色壓力初探。社區發展季刊,83,146-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭惠美(19981200)。北縣學童母親心理需求與家庭簡易醫護常識課程出席率之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,18,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭惠美(20010200)。應用自我導向學習策略培養社區志工--以臺北縣雙溪鄉社區健康營造中心為例。護理雜誌,48(1),43-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fisher, E. B. Jr.(1995)。The results of COMMIT trial。American Journal of Public Health,85,159-160。  new window
6.Beck, C.、Heacock, P.(1988)。Nursing interventions for patients with Alzheimer’s disease。Nursing Clinics of North America,23(1),95-124。  new window
7.Kelly, M. E.(1997)。Social interaction among people with dementia。Journal of Gerontological Nursing,23(4),16-20。  new window
8.Holter, I. M.、Schwartz-Barcott, D.(1993)。Action research: What is it? How has it been used and How can it be used in nursing?。Journal of Advantage Nursing,18(2),298-304。  new window
9.Hayes, J. M.(1999)。Respite for caregivers: A community-based model in a rural setting。Journal of Gerontological Nursings,25(1),22-26。  new window
10.Murray, D. M.(1995)。Design and analysis of community trials: Lessons from the Minnesota heart health program。American journal of epidemiology,142,569-575。  new window
11.Rains, J. W.、Ray, D. W.(1995)。Participatory action research for community health promotion。Public Health Nursing,12(4),256-261。  new window
12.Trettin, L.、Musham, C.(2000)。Using focus groups to design a community health program: What roles should volunteers play?。Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved,11(4),444-455。  new window
13.Webb, C.(1989)。Action research: philosophy, method and personal experiences。Journal of Advanced Nursing,14(5),403-410。  new window
14.邱詩揚、劉潔心、晏涵文(19990500)。強化社區組織功能之參與式行動研究。衛生教育學報,12,23-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Flynn, B. C.、Rider, M. S.、Ray, D. W.(1994)。Empowering communities: Action research through healthy cities。Health Education Quarterly,21(3),395-405。  new window
16.戴伸峰(19960600)。老人的生活壓力因應之道--積極社會參與。老人教育,9,50-57。  延伸查詢new window
17.高淑芬、蕭冰如、蔡秀敏、邱珮怡(20000200)。老年人的健康促進生活型態與衛生教育。護理雜誌,47(1),13-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.曾譯令、李淑杏、李孟智(19950100)。偏遠地區與城市地區老人健康狀況之比較。中山醫學雜誌,6(1),65-87。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃先傑、李悌愷、黃瑞雄(1992)。台灣地區65歲以上老年人曰常活動能立即生活依賴性之調查報告。中華民國老年醫學會第四屆學術演講。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李文祝(1997)。台中市南屯區社區老人福利服務之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張素綺(1995)。高雄市楠梓區老人有參加和沒參加健康檢查相關因素探討(碩士論文)。高雄醫學院,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳秋燕(1999)。社區老人參與「社會服務」對其心理社會影響之前驅性研究--以台北市北投區「大同之家」為例(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡淑媛(1996)。介入措施對社區老人高血壓防治之成效探討(碩士論文)。高雄醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.武茂玲(1999)。以行動研究法來探討影響臺北市北投區泉源里老年人健康檢查行為之相關因素(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台北縣衛生局(1997)。台北縣八十七年度中老年病防治工作計畫書(行政院衛生署保健計畫補助案)。台北縣衛生局。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱瑞玲、楊國樞(1987)。台灣民眾的心理需求及其相關因素。台北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院經建會(1996)。中華民國台灣地區84年至125年人口推計。行政院經建會。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院衛生署(1999)。國民保健三年計畫草案(民國八十八年至九十年)。行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院衛生署(1999)。辦理社區健康營造計畫。行政院衛生署保健處。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭惠美(2000)。以老人會為中心發展鄉村社區健康促進計畫(一)--雙溪鄉老人會會員健康照顧需求調查。台北縣雙溪鄉老人會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Edginton, C. R.、Hanson, C. J.、Edginton, S. R.(1992)。Leisure programming: Concepts, trends, and professional practice。Iowa:WCB Brown & Benchmark。  new window
8.Hart, E.、Bond, M.(1995)。Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice。Open University Press。  new window
9.Ross, M. G.(1967)。Community organization: Theory, principal and practice。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
10.Green, L. W.、Kreuter, M. W.(1999)。Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach。Mountain View, CA:PaloAlto:Mayfield Publishing Company。  new window
11.Maslow, A. H.(1968)。Toward a psychology of being。New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.林宗義(1995)。台灣老人的處境與希望:二十一世紀都市的主要課題。老人學學術年鑑。  延伸查詢new window
2.林振春(1997)。社區老人自助團體實驗報告--以台北新龍社區為例。老人的社區經營與教育參與。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳燕禎(1999)。社區老人照顧的運作模式。高齡者的學習權與社會權。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾旭正(1997)。讓社區動起來--社區總體營造。行動資源手冊。宜蘭縣:宜蘭縣立文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.Montgomery, K.(1993)。The Harvard alcohol project; promoting the designated driver on television。Organization Aspects of Health Communication Campaigns: What Works。Newbury Park,CA:Sage。  new window
6.Rider, M.、Flynn, B. C.(1993)。Indiana。Healthy cities。Bukingham:Open University Press。  new window
7.Wallack, L.(1990)。Mass communication and health promotion。Public Communication Campaigns。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
8.賴秀芬、郭淑珍(1996)。行動研究。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE