:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網頁的廣告環境對廣告效果之影響
書刊名:管理與系統
作者:何照義張若怡
作者(外文):Ho, Tsau-yuChang, Jo-i
出版日期:2001
卷期:8:4
頁次:頁439-467
主題關鍵詞:廣告效果整體記憶整體回憶廣告態度點選意願Advertisement effectRecallRecognitionAttitudeClick intention
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
     本研究主要在探討網頁的廣告環境對廣告效果之影響。其中廣告環境是用競爭廣告干擾(高、低)、廣告與內容的相關性、廣告訊息豐富程度(單純訊息、豐富訊息)三個變數來表示;並以網頁的涉入程度為干擾變數來探討消費者接收標題廣告訊息時的處理方式來評估廣告效果(包括廣告的整體回憶、整體再認、整體記憶、廣告態度與點選意願)。本研究選擇手機為實驗的產品,製作相關的標題廣告,採用2x2x2的三因子實驗設計,以大學學生為研究對象,經統計分析,獲得結論為:(1)競爭廣告會影響廣告效果,且競爭廣告干擾程度越大,目標廣告的廣告效果越好;(2)廣告與網頁內容的相關性會影響廣告的效果,越不相關的廣告,廣告效果越好;(3)廣告訊息豐富程度會影響廣告的效果,且當訊息越豐富時,廣告效果越佳。(4)瀏覽者本身的網頁內容涉入程度並不會對廣告效果造成影響。
     The main objective of this research is to investigate the web banner ad effect that consist of the recall of advertising, recognition of advertising, memory of advertising, attitude toward advertising, and click intention under different environments such as competitive interference of ad (high/low), informative of ad, relevance of content (relevant/irrelevant), and content involvement (high/low). The study utilized a 2*2*2 factorial experimental design. "Cellular Phone" is selected as an experimental product in producing the target product. We made proper questionnaire to investigate the college students, and collected 80 valid samples. Analyzing the data by MANOVA statistical method, the major findings are: (1)The competitive interference of ad has significant difference on the banner ad effect; (2) The informative of ad has significant difference on the banner ad effect; (3) The relevance of content has significant difference on the banner ad effect. The irrelevance ad has the better banner ad effect; (4) The content involvement has not significant difference on the banner ad effect.
期刊論文
1.Zanot, E.(1984)。Public attitudes toward advertising: the American experience。International Journal of Advertising,3(1),3-15。  new window
2.Ha, L.(1996)。Observations: advertising clutter in consumer magazines:dimensions and effects。Journal of Advertising Research,36(4),76-84。  new window
3.Abernethy Avert M.、Franke, George R.(1996)。The Information Content of Advertising: A Meta-Analysis。Journal of Advertising,25(2),1-17。  new window
4.Resnik, Alan、Stern, Bruce L.(1977)。An analysis of information content in television advertising。Journal of Marketing,41(1),50-53。  new window
5.Tavassoli, N. T.、Shultz, C. J. II、Fitzsimons, G. J.(1995)。Program Involvement: Are Moderate Levels Best for Ad Memory and Attitude toward the Ad?。Journal of Advertising Research,35(5),61-72。  new window
6.Keller, K. L.(1987)。Memory factors in advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations。Journal of Consumer Research,14(3),316-333。  new window
7.Burke, Raymond R.、Srull, Thomas K.(1988)。Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising。Journal of Consumer Research,15(1),55-68。  new window
8.Hoffman, Donna L.、Novak, Thomas P.(1996)。Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations。Journal of Marketing,60(3),50-68。  new window
9.Norris, Claire E.、Colman, Andrew M.(1992)。Context Effects on Recall and Recognition of Magazine Advertisements。Journal of Advertising,56(3),37-46。  new window
10.Soldow, G. F.、Principe, V.(1981)。Response to Commercials as A Function of Program Context。Journal of Advertising Research,21,59-65。  new window
學位論文
1.楊書成(1998)。全球資訊網廣告內容對廣告效果影響之探討--網路雜誌之實驗室研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳名璋(1998)。網站廣告呈現方式對廣告效果之影響(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.許世育(1999)。網路廣告效果之研究--對不同使用者類型與不同網站類型之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐雍閩(1998)。網際網路標題廣告效果影響:廣告大小與資訊量之影響,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃志楊(1999)。資訊曝露量與品牌效應對網路行銷效果之研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉靜梅(1999)。全球資訊網(WWW)網路廣告效果衡量方式之探討,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top