:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:閱讀與批評--文龍評《金瓶梅》
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:陳翠英 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chui-ying
出版日期:2001
卷期:15
頁次:頁283-285+287-320
主題關鍵詞:金瓶梅文龍張竹坡閱讀批評主體對話Chin-P'ing-MeiWen-longChang Chu-poReadCritic subjectDialogue
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
明代世情小說《金瓶梅》有三種評本。在「崇禎本」簡略的批語基礎之上,清人張竹坡、文龍相繼對該書作了豐富的批評,其中文龍評點由於發現較晚而猶有許多值得深入論述的空間。其內容涉及人物評述、小說技巧、辨析《金瓶梅》 情色描寫以及揭示《金瓶梅》 「嫉世病俗」義旨,由於文龍是直接寫在竹坡的評本之上以作出回應及批駁,此一「對話者」的立場使其評點充滿批判色彩,尤其是對書中若干女性的評價文龍更與竹坡針鋒相對;亦因在激烈的論辯之中逼顯出對「閱讀」、「批評」等文學活動的多面思考。讀者的態度、條件為何?閱讀應該遵循那些規則?由《金瓶梅》「以淫為戒」的深旨出發,文龍認為閱讀召喚了讀者的道德意識,期許讀者為具有高度理性的良知主體,道德意識的惕勵昂揚即是閱讀的終極關懷。而藉由對竹坡評點的強烈質疑,文龍評點彰顯了對讀者主體意識的重視,認為讀者、作者互為主體而共同建構小說意義,其說不僅承襲傳統小說評點的特質,亦頗能契合當今文學理論,因而在小說批評史上應有其值得肯定之地位。
The date there are three extant critical editions of the Ming dynasty novel Chin-P'ing-Mei. On the basis of the brief comments to be found in the Chung-chen edition, Ch'ing dynasty scholars Chang Chu-po and Wen Long went on to offer extensive critical commentaries. Of these two editions, the Wen Long vision was discovered relatively recently and offers a number of points worthy of further consideration, including its critique of characters, discussion of novel-writing techniques, analysis of erotic passages in Chin-P'ing-Mei, and exposition of the cynical undertone of the novel. Since Wen Long wrote his comments directly next to those of Chang Chu-po as a type of response and rebuttal, this “dialogue” format serves to give his comments a highly critical tone, particularly in terms of critiques of some of the female characters in the novel. Likewise, in the course of this heated debate, Wen Long gives serious consideration to the acts of reading and criticism, particularly in terms of what the reader's attitude is and what rules should apply to reading. Taking his cue from reader's Chin-P'ing-Mei's theme of using excess as a warning, Wen Long takes the view that the reader is a highly rational, conscientious entity and that reading stimulates his or her moral awareness. On this view, the ultimate goal of reading is to provoke and promote moral awareness. Through his strong questioning of Chang Chu-po's comments, Wen Long shows the emphasis he gives to the reader's self-awareness and his belief that the reader and the author are equally important and together construct the novel's meaning. Wen-Long's comments not only continue the tradition of the critique of Chinese classical novel, but also echo modern literary critical theory, and as such make Wen Long deserving of his place in the history of the criticism of the novel.
期刊論文
1.譚帆(1998)。中國古代小說評點的價值系統。文學評論,1998(1),96-99。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Barthes, Roland、溫晉儀(1998)。批評與真實。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.Martin, Wallace。當代敘事學。當代敘事學。北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉輝(1986)。文龍及其批評《金瓶梅》。〈金瓶梅〉成書與版本研究。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.三教開迷歸正演義,上海。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE