:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小體育科教科書內容意見之研究
書刊名:國立體育學院論叢
作者:陳明耀
作者(外文):Chen, Ming-yao
出版日期:2001
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁91-105
主題關鍵詞:教科書內容與組織教學設計TextbookInstructional designContent and organization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:23
     本研究主要目的在探討臺北市國小教師對體育科教科書內容的意見,以自編之「臺北市國小體育科教科書教師意見調查問卷」為使用工具,並以百分比描述,卡方考驗等作為資料分析的統計方法。經叢集抽樣法抽取41所學校之223位體育任課教師為研究對象,經資料處理分析後獲致以下結果: 一、 教師對課本內容組織之意見: 1. 超過六成教師同意課本「內容引起學生興趣」、「內容與學生生活經驗相關」、「內容份量配合該階段學生需要」。超過四成體育教師同意「內容缺乏體育常識介紹」。 2. 體育教師同意「遊戲比賽規則介紹詳細」者佔五成;全體同意「內容偏重技能學習」者超過四成。 3. 不同意者與同意「內容與其他相關科目能有適當連結」者約各佔三成。 二、 教師對教師手冊之教學設計之意見 1. 教師對於教師手冊「指引教師了解教材順利教學」、「提供多元化的教學方法」「教學設計具安全性」、「教學設計生動活潑有變化」等方面,同意程度皆達七成以上。 2. 同意「教學設計考量學生個別差異」者佔四成,不同意者約近三成。 3. 同意「教學設計激發教師作進一步學習與研究」、「對教材作適當分析提昇教師學知能」者分別約為五成與七成。同意「提供多元具體的評量方式」者佔五成。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate the opinion of the teacher in primary school physical education textbooks at Taipei City. To fulfill the researche purpose, questionnaire survey had been adopted. A total of 223 teachers in primary school were sampled as the subjects for thus study. The data were analyzed by frequence distribution and chi-square. The main results of this study were de scribed briefly as follows: 1. Teachers' opinion of physical education textbook's contents. (1) Over 60% teachers agreed that the contents of physical education textbooks interested students and were related to students' life experiences. Over 50% teachers agreed that the contents took places, equipment, and number of students into consideration. More than 40% teachers thought the contents was lack of introducing some physical education common sense. (2) 50% teachers agreed that the textbooks included useful contents for rainy days and 30% disagreed. Over 40% teacher agreed that the contents did not link well between grades. (3) 30% teachers agreed that the contents had proper link with other related courses and 30% teachers disagreed. 2. Teacher's opinion of instructional design in physical education teacher's manual. (1) More then 70% teachers agreed that the teacher's manual "guided them to understand the material and further have good instruction", "offered diversified teaching skills", "safety instructional design", "active and various instructional design". (2) 40% teachers agreed that the instructional design took individual differences of students into consideration and almost 30% disagreed. (3) 50% teachers agreed that the instructional design inspired teachers to have further study and research. 50% teachers agreed that the textbooks provided with various and concrete evaluation methods.
期刊論文
1.Crumbly, J. W.、Copeland, A.(1983)。Suggested criteria for the selection of textbooks。Business Education Forum,37(5),24-25。  new window
2.周宏室(19931000)。現行學校體育課實施之探究--以臺北市為例。國立體育學院論叢,4(1),49-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.湯錦宏(19930600)。國立師範學院第一屆結業生「體育教學」現況研究。臺北師院學報,6,781-849。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾火城(1996)。教科書評鑑規準研究--以國中美術科為建構、試用實例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭秋祺(1997)。有效體育教學因素之分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐用生、吳明清(1996)。國小藝能科教科書評鑑研究。臺北:中華民國教材研究發展學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙寧(1998)。教學設計之呈現方式在概念學習上的應用。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐用生、黃政傑(1997)。國小審定本教科書評鑑報告。臺北:中華民國課程與教學學會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gall, M. D.(1981)。Handbook for evaluating and selecting curriculum materials。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
6.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Finch, C. R.、Crunkilton, J. R.(1993)。Curriculum Development in Vocational and Technical Education: Planning, Content, and Implementation。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
圖書論文
1.林貴美(1989)。法國教科書編輯的基本概念與評鑑要點研究。各國教科書比較研究。臺北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.Abt, C. C.(1972)。An evaluation model: How to compare curriculum materials。Improvements in curriculum。Virginia:College Readings。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top