:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:平衡計分卡之規劃與設計--以基隆港務局為例
書刊名:國立臺灣海洋大學海運學報
作者:劉金鳳高惠松 引用關係
出版日期:2002
卷期:10
頁次:頁1-29
主題關鍵詞:策略觀點績效評估平衡計分卡TrategicPerfermance measurementBalanced scorecard
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
平衡計皆卡為一策略性績效評估制度,可藉之達成公司遠景及策略。鑑於平衡計分卡在非營利機構的研究較為不足,再加上非營利機構缺乏以利潤作為績效指標,因此決策是否正確、資源是否善用、使命是否達成等,都較難檢討改進,因此它們更需要有效的績效管理。所以本研究採用個案研究方式,以平衡計分卡為理論基礎,藉由書面資料蒐集、直接觀察和深入訪談等方式,為基隆港局規劃與設計一套專屬的平衡計分卡。 本研究主要發現:基隆港務局之現行管理制度受上位政策影響甚鉅、策略難以定義、策略與績效評估指標間關係薄弱及績效評估指標未能涵蓋平衡計分卡之四大構面。而在平衡計分卡的發展過程中,發現能促使本制度成功指行之關鍵因素為:上位主管機關的支持、建立平衡計分卡推行小組、重新塑造組織文化、資訊透明的資訊平臺、人人力資源體系的配合及全員參與等六點。 對基隆港務局之平衡計分卡規劃與設計之結果為:長期策略之九大管略主題分別為營收成長、健全費率結構、增加航商滿意度、提昇港埠服務品質、增加港埠營運效率、健全管理制度與管理資訊化、通過環保作業ISO-14000國際品質證、勇於創新精神、提昇員工滿度意。而後依策導出四大構面績效評估指標,並依四大構面展開建構平衡計分卡策略圖,而後再展開基隆港局總局平衡計分卡,一階單位平衡計分卡及個人平衡計分卡。
Balanced scorecard is strategic performance measurement system, by means of that companies could reach their desired prospects and strategies. From the point of insufficient research in nonprofit institutions, they always fail to take the profit as a performance indicator. Therefore, even their decision is correct, either the resource being fully utilized or the mission being accomplished is difficult to be reviewed and improved. Consequently, the more effective performance management will be needed. This research adopts case study and base on the theory of BSC. Through document collecting, direct observation and in depth interviewing, we could plan and design an exclusive BSC for Keelung Harbor Bureau. The crucial discovery of this research: The managerial system of Keelung Harbor Bureau is deeply affected by the policy of executive stuff, it is hard to definite the strategy and there is a thin correlation between the strategy and performance evaluating indicators. Also the performance evaluating indicators could not over all aspects of four major perspectives of BSC. In the process BSC’s growth, we found that the subject system successfully carried out by six critical factors: 1.The support from superior 2.Establishing a proceeding team of BSC 3.Rebuilding the organization culture 4.Offering sufficient information 5.Harmnoy with human resource system 6.Entire participating. Base on the findings of this research, the following conclusions are reached: The long-term strategy of the subject organization includes nine major strategic guidelines as follows: 1.The growth of gains 2.Reasonable rate structure 3.Enhancing the satisfaction of carriers 4.Improving the service quality of harbor 5.Increasing the operation efficiency of harbor 6.Managerial system strengthened and computerized 7.Passing through the ISO-14000 of international environment protection 8.Being brave in creating 9.Enhancing the satisfaction of employees. Then the four major perspective performance evaluation indictors are developed by strategy. Following the BSC strategy chart is buil up by four major perspectives. Finally, we develop the BSC of Keelung Harbor Bureau, including division-level BSC and personal BSC.
期刊論文
1.Wise, I. R.(1997)。The Balanced Scorecard Approach to Strategy Management。The Public Manager,26(3),47-50。  new window
2.Otley, D. T.(1999)。Performance Management: a Framwork for Management Control Systems Research。Management Accounting Research,10(4),363-382。  new window
3.Martinsons, M.、Davison, R.、Tse, D.(1999)。The Balanced Scorecard: A Foundation for the Strategic Management of Information Systems。Decision Support Systems,25(1),71-88。  new window
4.Campi, J.(1992)。It's Not Easy as ABC。Journal of Cost Management,1992(Summer),5-11。  new window
5.Bulter, A.、Letza, S. R.、Neale, B.(1997)。Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy。Long Range Planning,1997(Apr.),242-253。  new window
6.Corrigan, J.(1996)。The balanced scorecard: The new approach to performance measurement。Australian Accountant,66(7),47-48。  new window
7.Eccles, R. G.(1991)。The Performance Measurement Manifesto。Havard Business Review,69(1),131-137。  new window
8.Hoffecker, J.、Goldenberg, C.(1994)。Using the balanced scorecard to develop companywide performance measures。Journal of Cost Management,8(3),5-17。  new window
9.李書行(19950200)。過程結果並重 個人群體兼顧--務實創新的策略性績效評估。會計研究月刊,113,15-23。  延伸查詢new window
10.周齊武、吳安妮、施能錠、Haddad, Kamal(20010200)。探索實施平衡計分卡可能遭遇之問題。會計研究月刊,183,63-74。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kloot, L.、Martin, J(2000)。Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government。Management Accounting Research,11,231-251。  new window
12.Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(1996)。Using the balanced score card as a strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85。  new window
13.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy。California Management Review,39(1),53-79。  new window
14.吳安妮(20010300)。策略為焦點的組織--平衡計分卡式的公司如何在新企業環境中取勝。會計研究月刊,184,120-127。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳安妮(20010400)。策略為焦點的組織--平衡計分卡式的公司如何在新企業環境中取勝。會計研究月刊,185,127-135。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳安妮(20010500)。策略為焦點的組織--平衡計分卡式的公司如何在新企業環境中取勝。會計研究月刊,186,126-137。  延伸查詢new window
17.Grady, Michael W.(1991)。Performance Measurement: Implementing Strategy。Management Accounting,72(12),49-53。  new window
18.Jones, Thomas O.、Sasser, W. Earl Jr.(1995)。Why Satisfied Customers Defect。Harvard Business Review,73(6),88-99。  new window
19.Kaplan, R. S.、Norton, D. P.(1993)。Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work。Harvard Businesses Review,71(5),134-147。  new window
20.Chow, Chee W.、Haddad, Kamal M.、Williamson, James E.(1997)。Applying the Balance Scorecard to Small Companies。Management Accounting,78(2),21-27。  new window
會議論文
1.Frecka, T.(1998)。Accounting for manufacturing productivity : a set of papers from an AME meeting : problems and directions in cost accounting。Accounting for manufacturing productivity : a set of papers from an AME meeting : problems and directions in cost accounting。Association for Manufacturing Excellence。  new window
研究報告
1.宇泰工程顧問有限公司(2001)。基隆港整體規劃及未來發展計畫通盤檢討--期末報告初稿。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李誠修(2000)。策略具體行動化的整合性管理架構--以計畫性生產工廠為例(碩士論文)。國防管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.周傳震(2000)。平衡計分卡制度應用於國防科技研發機構之研究(碩士論文)。國防管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.樊孝薇(2000)。大眾運輸系統的績效評估-從平衡計分卡的觀點作探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅澤鈺(1998)。平衡計分卡之規劃與設計(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(2000)。The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
2.交通部基隆港務局(2001)。交通部基隆港務局八十八年下半年及八十九年度工作考成自評報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.Atkinson, A.、Banker, R.、Kaplan, R.、Young, M.(1995)。Management Accounting。Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Bob, Ryan、Robert, Scapens、Michael, W. Theobald(1992)。Research Method and Methodlogy in Finance and Accounting。  new window
5.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.、朱道凱(1999)。平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具。臺北市:臉譜文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
7.Yin, Robert K.(1989)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
8.謝安田(1979)。企業研究方法。臺北:水牛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Ernst、Young(1995)。The Ernst & Young Guide to Performance Measurement for Financial Institutions。Irwin Inc.。  new window
其他
1.台灣省政府交通處基隆港務局(1997)。基隆港整體規劃及未來發展計畫。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE