:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣與全球紙漿暨造紙工業之生產力分析,1991-2000--Malmquist指數之應用
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:許景翔 引用關係尚瑞國
作者(外文):Hseu, Jiing-shyangShang, Jui-kou
出版日期:2002
卷期:72
頁次:頁89-117
主題關鍵詞:Malmquist生產力指數非參數邊界法技術變動效率變動紙漿暨造紙工業Malmquist productivity indexNonparametric-frontierTechnical changeEfficient changePulp and paper industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:24
     本文的目的:衡量包括臺灣在內全球前30大紙漿與紙生產國在1991-2000年間的生產力。本文利用非參數邊界法計算Malmquist生產力指數,並將指數分解成技術變動與效率變動。實證結果顯示全球紙漿暨造紙工業的生產力年增率以韓國的-0.9%最低,而以加拿大與日本的2.4%最高。北歐的芬蘭、挪威、瑞典則有1.4%至1.6%的表現。臺灣紙漿暨造紙工業的生產力年增率達1.4%,較大多數的新興經濟國家為優。結果亦顯示臺灣生產力成長的主要因素乃是效率改善,而非技術進步。
     The objective of this research is to measure the productivity of the world's top 30 pulp and paper producing countries, including Taiwan, over the period 1991-2000. We calculated the Malmquist productivity index by using the nonparametric-frontier approach, and decomposed the index into two components: technical change and efficiency change. Empirical results showed that the productivity change of pulp and paper industry in the world ranged from Korea's -0.9\5 to Japan's and Canada's 2.4% over the sampled period. The Nordic nations (Finland, Norway, and Sweden) recorded 1.4%-1.6% improvement in performance. The productivity of Taiwan's pulp and paper industry increased by 1.4%, which was better than most emerging economy. The results also showed that Taiwan's productivity growth was attributed more to efficiency change than technical change.
期刊論文
1.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurites R.、Diewert, W. Eerwin(1982)。Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers。The Economic Journal,92(365),73-86。  new window
2.Fare, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Roos, P.(1995)。Productivity and Quality in Swedish Pharmacies。International Journal of Production Economics,39,137-147。  new window
3.Färe, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Norris, M.、Zhang, Z.(1994)。Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries。The American Economic Review,84(1),66-83。  new window
4.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
5.李文福、王媛慧(19980900)。臺灣地區公私立醫學中心與區域醫院生產力變動之研究--無母數Malmquist指數之應用。經濟論文,26(3),243-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lindgren, B.、Grosskopf, S.、Fare, R.、Roos, P.、Färe, R.(1992)。Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Nonparametric Malmquist Approach。Journal of Productivity Analysis,3(3),85-101。  new window
7.Buongiorno, J.、De Borger, B.(1985)。Productivity Growth in the Paper and Paperboard Industry: A Variable Cost Function Approach。Canadian Journal of Forest Research,15(6),1013-1020。  new window
8.Buongiorno, J.、Hseu, J. -H.(1994)。Productivity in the Pulp and Paper Industries of the United States and Canada: A Nonparametric Analysis。Canadian Journal of Forest Research,24,2353-2361。  new window
9.Martinello, F.(1985)。Factor Substitution, Technical Change, and Returns to Scale in Canadian Forest Industries。Canadian Journal of Forest Research,15(6),1116-1124。  new window
10.Singh, B. K.、Nautiyal, J. C.(1986)。Long-term Productivity and Factor Demand in the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry。Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,34,21-44。  new window
11.Lee, K. J.、Orr, B.(1990)。A Nonparametric Analysis of Variable Cost Minimization in the United States Paper Industry。Applied Economics,22,839-852。  new window
12.Duffy, P. A.、Quicke, H. E.、Caulfield, J. P.(1990)。The Production Structure of the U. S. Paper Industry。Forest Products Journal,40(9),44-48。  new window
13.Sherif, F.(1983)。Derived Demand of Factors of Production in the Pulp and Paper Industry。Forest Products Journal,33(1),45-49。  new window
14.Varian, H. R.(1984)。The Nonparametric Approach to Production Analysis。Econometrica,52(3),579-597。  new window
15.Frank, D. L.、Ghebremichael, A.、Oum, T. H.、Tretheway, M. W.(1990)。Productivity Performance of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry。Canadian Journal of Forest Research,20(6),825-836。  new window
16.潘明如、許景翔(2000)。臺灣紙漿、造紙工業生產力之無母數分析。中華林學季刊,33(1),127-141。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Bernstein, J. I.(1989)。Taxes, production and Adjustment in the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry。Ottawa, Canada。  new window
2.Oum, T. H.、Tretheway, M. W.、Zhang, Y.(1990)。Productivity Measurement for the Pulp and Paper Industry with Adjustment for Capacity Utilization: A Comparison of Canada, Sweden, and the U. S.。Canada。  new window
學位論文
1.陳杏如(2000)。應用財務比率分析台灣造紙業獲利能力之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭妙玉(1998)。臺灣紙業一百年,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fried, H. O.、Lovell, C. A. K.、Schmidt, S. S.(1993)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Färe, Rolf S.、Grosskopf, Shawna、Lovell, C. A. Knox(1994)。Production Frontiers。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Lewin, A. Y.、Seiford, L. M.(1994)。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications。Norwell:Boston, MA:London:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
4.Miller Freeman Publication Inc.(1991)。Paper and Paper International。Paper and Paper International。San Francisco, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Färe, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Lindgren, B.、Roos, P.(1989)。Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE