依據介入研究(Intervention Research)、社會團體工作、受暴婦女文獻實務、婦女需求等；目的：(1)資料整合分析發展實務指導綱要；(2)執行受暴婦女團體工作方案；(3)效果評估－方案是否達成介入目標；(4)過程評估－方案執行成功與修正探討。實務指導綱要：團體不要太大，自願性成員，以交互作用模式(interactionist approach)進行，提供支持性環境，重視成員成長、自決、個別性、參與、自信心提升，社工者自我反省覺察。團體持續10單元，每單元三小時，七名婦女參與，執行時問2001年七至九月。效果評估量化資料採單案評估研究AB設計，工具為一份標準化生心理健康量表，分析方法以「兩個標準差」及「效果大小」(Effect Size)計算，評估個別成員介入前後(AB)量表分數是否達統計顯著差異；過程評估除每單元結束優點與修正探討，檢視每位成員參與及需求滿足，並設計開放性問卷各單元及團體結束時收集成員意見；團體發展過程分析包括籌備期、目標確立與契約期、作業期、結束期。質化資料評估結果發現團體目標達成有：(1)團體凝聚力與認同；(2)成員互相支持；(3)成員自我成長；量化資料分析發現，僅一位成員「兩個標準差」達統計顯著有效，兩位雖未達統計顯著改變，但其ES在0.6以上，可接受普遍效果。

A social group work, sponsored by the Taipei City Government, presents a supportive group for the battered women who are the service users of the Association of New Women Union in Taipei. By focusing on meeting the individual woman's needs, the group utilize intervention research paradigm to innovate an interactional and supportive environent. The purposes of the intervention are: (1) to develop the practice guidelines, (2) to carry out the social work group, and (3) to implement the outcome and process evaluations. Seven battered women voluntarily participated in this group; participants chose their own goals and identified personal and environmental factors that contributed to their abused problems. A single-case evaluation designs, AB-basic singe-case design was utilized for doing the outcome evaluation with a standardized questionnaire measuring the women's well-beings. Results of the outcome evaluation found that one member's scores of her well-being had statistically significant improved; and two members had their effect sizes over 0.6. According to qualitative data, the goals achieved in the group include developing members' supportive relationships, building the group's cohesion and identification, creating the members' trustful and acceptable environment, and improving the members' self growth.