:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:漢語派生動詞「......化」的概念結構與語法功能
書刊名:清華學報
作者:湯廷池
作者(外文):Tang, Ting-chi
出版日期:2002
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁411-439
主題關鍵詞:漢語派生動詞派生後綴-化詞彙概念結構語意前綴使動及物與起動不及物交替Chinese derivative verbsVerbal suffix -huaSemantic prefixLexical conceptual structureCausative-inchoative alternation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:52
漢語的派生動詞由詞幹與詞綴合成,而在現代漢語裡只有動詞後綴‘-化’具有旺盛的孳生力;不但可以附加於單音、雙音或多音名詞與形容詞後面形成動詞,而且還可以帶上‘泛-、反-、去-’等語意前綴形成長達五音節的派生動詞。本文針對這一個現代漢語裡唯一的漢語後綴‘-化’,深入探討下列幾個問題:(一)如果動詞後綴‘-化’是由動詞‘化’經過虛化而來,那麼‘化’本來的意義與用法是什麼?虛化的過程與方向又是什麼?(二)含有動詞後綴‘-化’的派生動詞,依其論元結構、動貌意涵應該屬於哪一種次類?(三)漢語動詞無標的音節數目是單音節和雙音節, 但是含有‘-化’的派生動詞卻可以連同語意前綴長達四、五個音節,這種音節數目的有標性在詞法與句法表現上可能引起怎麼樣的特殊現象?(四)含有詞幹‘化’的複合詞與含有詞綴‘-化’的派生詞,其詞彙概念結構究竟如何表述?其中不少動詞還產生「使動及物與起動不及物交替」的現象,究竟應該如何詮釋?
Chinese derivative verbs, verbal suffix ‘-hua’, (-化), which can be suffixed to monosyllabic, disyllabic and even trisyllabic noun or adjective stems to form causative-transitive verbs and inchoative-intransitive verbs, with regard to : (1) How id the verbal suffix ‘-hua’(-化) grammaticalized from the original verb (2) Which subcategory will the Chinese derivative verbs containing ‘-hua’ (-化) fall under in terms of their argument structure and lexical aspect?(3) The unmarked number of syllables for Chinese verbs is said to be monosyllabic or disyllabic, but with the addition of semantic prefixes such as ‘fan-(泛-), fan-(反-),qu-(去-)’, the resulting verbs can be as long as five syllables. What kind of marked phenomena might manifest with these marked verbs in terms their morphological and syntactic behaviors? (4) How will the compound verb containing the verb stem ‘hua’(化) and the derivative verb suffixed by ‘-hua’ (-化) be represented in their lexical conceptual structure (and related to, as well as distinguished from, each other? How can their alternation between causative-transitive and inchoative-intransitives be accounted for?
期刊論文
1.Nishiyama, Kunio(1998)。V-V compounds as serialization。Journal of East Asian Linguistics,7,175-217。  new window
2.Li, Ya-fei(1993)。Structural Heads and Aspectuality。Language,69,480-504。  new window
3.湯廷池(20020700)。漢語複合動詞的「使動與起動交替」。語言暨語言學,3(3),615-644。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Geyskens, S.、Davidse, K.(1998)。Have you walked the dog yet? The ergative causativization of intransitives。Word,49,155-180。  new window
5.Levin, B.、Roppaport Hovav, M.(1994)。A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English。Lingua,92,35-77。  new window
6.Miyagawa, S.(1998)。Sase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words。Journal of Japanese Linguistics,16,67-110。  new window
7.奧津敬一郎(1970)。自動化.他動化及び兩極化轉形-自.他動詞の對應。國語學,70,46-66。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.McCawley, J. D.(1971)。Prelexical syntax。22nd Annual Roundtable Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies。Georgetown University Press。19-33。  new window
2.湯廷池(2000)。華語動詞的音節數目與句法表現。沒有紀錄。209-230。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Nishiyama, K.(1998)。The morphosyntax and morphophonology of Japanese predicates,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Lieber, R.(1998)。The suffix -ize in English: Implications for morphology。Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax。沒有紀錄:CSLI Publications。  new window
2.宮島達夫(1994)。語彙論研究。むぎ書房。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jacobsen, W.(1992)。Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese。Tokyo:Kuroshio。  new window
4.Quirk, Randolph、Greenbaum, Sidney、Leech, Geoffrey、Svartvik, Jan(1972)。A grammar of contemporary English。London:Longman Group Limited。  new window
5.Levin, Beth、University of Chicago(1993)。English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation。Chicago, IIl。  new window
6.Levin, Beth、Hovav, Malka Rappaport(1995)。Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface。MIT Press。  new window
7.影山太郎(1996)。動詞意味論--意味と認知の接点。東京:くろしお。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jackendoff, Ray S.(1990)。Semantic Structures。MIT Press。  new window
9.Gruber, J. S.(1976)。Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics。Amsterdam:North-Holland Publishing Company。  new window
10.Jackendoff, Ray S.(1983)。Semantics and cognition。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
11.影山太郎(1993)。文法と語形成。ひつじ書房。  延伸查詢new window
12.影山太郎(1999)。形態論と意味。形態論と意味。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
13.影山太郎(2000)。自他交替の意味的メカニズム。日英語の自他の交替。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lemmens, M.(1998)。Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity。Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity。沒有紀錄。  new window
15.丸田忠雄(1998)。使役動詞のアナトミー:語彙的使役動詞の語彙概念構造。使役動詞のアナトミー:語彙的使役動詞の語彙概念構造。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
16.松本曜(2000)。A reexamination of the crosslinguistic parameterization of causative predicates: Evidence from Japanese and other languages。Argument Realization。沒有紀錄。  new window
17.松本曜(1996)。Causative alternation in English and Japanese: A closer look。動詞意味論-言語と認知の接点。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
18.松本曜。使役移動構文における意味的制約。認知言語學1:事象構造(言語科學,第二卷)。0。  延伸查詢new window
19.McClure, W.(1998)。Morphosyntactic realization of aspectual structure。Japanese/ Korean Linguistics, 7。沒有紀錄。  new window
20.西村義樹(1998)。行為者と使役構文。構文と事項構造。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
21.小野尚文(2000)。動詞クラスモデルと自他交替。日英語の自他の交替。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
22.Plag, I.(1997)。The polysemy of -ize derivatives: On the role of semantics in word formation。Yearbook of Morphology。沒有紀錄。  new window
23.Rappaport Hovav, M.、Levin, B.(1988)。What to do with theta-roles。Thematic Relations。沒有紀錄。  new window
24.Rappaport Hovav, M.、Levin, B.(1998)。Building verb meaning。The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors。沒有紀錄。  new window
25.Ritter, E.、Rosen, S. T.(1998)。Delimiting events in syntax。The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors。沒有紀錄。  new window
26.Talmy, L.(1996)。The windowing of attention in language。Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hale, Kenneth、Keyser, Samuel Jay(1993)。On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations。The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
2.Vendler, Zeno(1967)。Verbs and times。Linguistics in Philosophy。Cornell University Press。  new window
3.Shibatani, M.(1976)。Causativization。Japanese Generative Grammar。New York:Academic Press。  new window
4.Talmy, L.(1976)。Semantic causative types。Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions。New York:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE