:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民、消費者、國家與市場
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:陳淳文
作者(外文):Chen, Chwen-wen
出版日期:2003
卷期:15:2
頁次:頁263-307
主題關鍵詞:公民國家消費者市場管制規制民營化公共服務CitizenStateConsumerMarketControlRegulatePrivatizationPublic service
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:74
  • 點閱點閱:40
本文之主旨在於探究現今公民與國家二者之間的相互關係,以及其各自所應扮演的角色。亞里斯多德的傳統公民觀視公民同時為統治者與被治者。此即彰顯每個個體皆必然隸屬於集體之中。然而自十七、十八世紀以降,國家與社會、公領域與私領域、自私與利他,以及理想與感情之二元區分,已成為西方近代國家的組織基礎。
但是公領域與私領域之區分於今逐步淡化。馬克思與黑格爾也早已認為此種區分有超越的必要。今日自由主義與全球化之趨勢更是逐日削減公領域之範圍,使公民角色漸為消費者之角色所取代。
面對此趨勢,國家應由傳統管制者的角色轉變為規制者之角色。而在國家逐步退出社會生活,人民再次由公權力之桎梏解放出來時,更需強調個體之道德感與友愛情操,以維繫整體之秩序及其存在。
The main purpose of this article is to study the mutual relation between the citizen and the state; and its role in our epoch. For Aristotle, a citizen is both governor and governrd. This classic version assumes that all individuals belonging to a historically developed community. Since the later seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the oppositions between the individual and the state, the private and the public, egotism and altruism, as well as between a life governed by reason and one governed by the passions, have constitutive of human existence in the Western modern state. Just like Kant asserted, the realm of the ethical is reserved for the private workings of inner life the public arena is the sphere of right, of mutual and rational consent to the individual and collective will of others.
But nowadays the distinction between the public and the private decline. Hegel and Marx, both, in different ways, have already sought to overcome this distinction between leaglity and morality, between juridical community and ethical life that was believed by Kant. The actual tendency of the globalization and liberalism enlarges the field of the market and reduces the role of the state. The role of the comsumer substitutes for the citizen.
Facing to this trend, it is necessary for the state to change its role from a controller to a regulator. The new emancipation of the subject from the public authority demands emphasis on the force of moral sentiments and Natural affections, which roots main in community.
期刊論文
1.陳弱水(19970600)。公德觀念的初步探討--歷史源流與理論建構。人文及社會科學集刊,9(2),39-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mann, Michael(1987)。Ruling Class Strategies and Citizenship。Sociology,21(3),339-354。  new window
3.Chevallier, J.(1980)。L'Etat-Nation。Reveue du Droit Public,6。  new window
4.Ellul, J.(1992)。Remarques sur les origins de 1'Etat。Droit,15。  new window
5.Fournier, J.(1997)。L'Etat dans un monde en evolution, A propos du rapport de la Banque mondiale。Revue Francaise D'Administration Publique,84。  new window
6.Gautier, C.(1992)。De la liberte chez les modernes: Freguson, critique de la modernite。Droits,15。  new window
7.Mouly, C.(1997)。Propriete publique, propriete privee et justice。Archives de Philosophie du Droit,41。  new window
研究報告
1.劉宗德(2000)。政府業務委託民間辦理類型及程序之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bendix, Reinhard(1964)。Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order。Garden City, N.Y.:Doubleday。  new window
2.van Gunsteren, Herman(1998)。A Theory of Citizenship: Organizing plurality in contemporary democracies。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
3.McClelland, J. S.、彭懷棟(2000)。西洋政治思想史。臺北:商業周刊出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sabine, George H.、李少軍、尚新建(1991)。西方政治思想史。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.張晉芬(20010000)。臺灣公營事業民營化:經濟迷思的批判。臺北市:中研院社研所。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Constant, B.(1980)。De la liberte chez les Anciens et les Modernes. Ecrits politiques。De la liberte chez les Anciens et les Modernes. Ecrits politiques。Paris, France。  new window
7.Crozier, M.(1991)。Etat modeste, Etat moderne: Strategies pour un autre changement。Etat modeste, Etat moderne: Strategies pour un autre changement。Paris, France。  new window
8.Ferguson, A.(1783)。Essai sur l'histoire de la societe civile。Essai sur l'histoire de la societe civile。Paris, France。  new window
9.Freund, J.(1976)。L'ennemi et le tiers dans l'Etat。Archives de Philosophie du Droit。Paris, France。  new window
10.Hale, D.(2001)。The Natural History of Citizenship。Friends and Citizens: Essay in Honor of Wilson Carey McWilliams。Oxford。  new window
11.Hardin, G.(1998)。The Tragedy of the Commons。Managing the Commons。Bloomington, IN。  new window
12.Ost, F.(1995)。Le milieu, un objet hybride qui dejoue la distinction public-prive。Public/ Prive。Paris, France。  new window
13.Philip, C.、Soldatos, P.(1996)。Introduction generale: Au-dela et en deca de l'Etat-Nation: L'Etat 'perfore' par l'interdependance-integration internationale et eclate par l'activation d'acteurs sous-nationaux。Au-dela et en deca de l'Etat-Nation。Bruxelles。  new window
14.Quermonne, J. L.(1998)。Reflexions prospectives sur la citoyennete europeenne。Melanges Jacques Robert: Libertes。Paris, France。  new window
15.Thiry, B.(1999)。Les conceptions de l'interet general dans l'Union europeenne。Conseil d'Etat, Rapport public 1999。Paris, France。  new window
16.Turner, B.(1992)。Outline of a Theory of Citizenship。Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community。London, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Zacher, Mark(1992)。The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance。Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.江宜樺(1995)。政治社群與生命共同體:亞里斯多德城邦理論的若干啟示。政治社群。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡英文(1995)。麥可.歐克秀的市民社會理論:公民結社與政治社群。政治社群。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.林火旺(1998)。公民身分:認同和差異。多元主義。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.Giddens, A.(1983)。Class division, class conflict and citizenship rights。Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
6.Seligman, A. B.(1993)。The Fragile Ethical Vision of Civil Society。Citizenship and Social Theory。London, UK:SAGE Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE