It is pointed by Aristotle that human nature requires ethics to purse good or happiness. Following Aristotle, Aquinas also maintains that the development of ethics is connected to human nature; he thus assumes “actus humamus” to be “ethical acts.” The ethical claims of traditional Christianity mostly follow the doctrines of Aristotle and then Aquinas, beginning with the “postulate” of human minds and affirming that the common tendency of mankind is to “purse happiness”; in this basic context, we relate the exploration of “what is happiness” with “the supreme happiness-God or Adonai.” As we delve into the question “what is the ultimate happiness?” we have gone beyond the level of ethics to explore the metaphysical issue of “being.” Besides, both Aquinas and Aristotle advocate that the interaction between reason and will is involved weather we cognize and analyze the formation of ethical acts through the cognitive dimension or we understand the process of ethical acts through the ethical dimension. Therefore, in this article, we first grasp the significance on the dimension of ethics through the exploration on the dimension of knowledge. On the dimension of knowledge, we first understand the significance of “ethical acts”' then we analyze the constituent elements of ethical practice-”reason” and “will”; and finally, we analyze the basis of ethical practice: natural laws. On the ethical dimension, we approach the ethic acts and practice in terms of reason, will, and natural laws to explain how reason cognizes and judges according to natural laws and how will chooses and practices in terms of natural laws.