本文希望藉由專利的目之探索，形塑最適化與本土化的規範法理，以國際爭議為楔子進入討論的主軸：首先從專利制史觀察，以十九世紀當時將專利法廢除的國家－荷蘭與瑞士經驗以及近代美國、日本積極改革專利制度對其國內產業的影響。其次，由經濟學角度觀察，專利權正當化的學說根據何在，並且對於專利制度是否會帶來創新進行探討，不同學說針對專利保護範圍的寬嚴有相左主張，以經濟學的角度來看專利制度設計上應避免手段與目的間的混淆。最後，由TRIPS架構找尋國內專利制度在立法、行政、司法所存在的空間，並提出建議，希冀創造一個有效率、彈性的法制環境。

By exploring the purposes of the patent regime, the possibly optimized and localized rules and laws are investigated in this paper. The recent international issues are briefly introduced. Here, the observations from the progressing history of patent laws are also conducted. The effects caused by reforming the national patent laws in U.S. and Japan are discussed. In addition, from the economics viewpoints, it is studied whether the justification of the patent rights can be empirically supported by data of innovation encouragement. There are many theories to discuss whether broad or narrow scopes of claim protection are efficient. Finally, in accordance with TRIPS, we are looking for the compromises and possible solutions in the legislative, administrative, judiciary perspectives.