:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Interactions in Synchronous Distance Education
書刊名:The Journal of Nursing Research
作者:邱淑芬鍾聿琳
作者(外文):Chiou, Shwu-fenChung, Ue-lin
出版日期:2003
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁188-196
主題關鍵詞:遠距教學教學互動評量Distance educationInstructional interactionEvaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:29
     隨著電腦及網路科技的蓬勃發展,學生透過遠距教學方式能夠即時且彈性獲得新的資訊,達到終身學習的目標。由於研究者在以往推動遠距教學的過程中,發現學生感受到遠距教學的教學互動較傳統課室教學為少,因此本研究目的為建立同步式遠距教學中教學互動評估量表,並測試量表的信效度,以做為評量遠距教學中教學互動的工具。本研究係依研究者經驗及參考文獻,編製36題「同步式遠距教學互動量表」,然後對接受同步式遠距教學課程的二所學校100名學生進行測試,將收集資料檢測此量表信效度。研究結果發現此量表信度Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient為0.901,以因素分析進行量表建構效度,結果共萃取出29題,並歸類出七種互動類型,其可解釋總變異量為72.69 %。此量表經由測試結果顯示具有良好內在一致性及建構效度,為一有效且可用的工具,它能夠有效評估同步式遠距教學中互動狀況,有助於教師瞭解遠距教學課程中教學互動狀況,可提供未來發展各類科同步式遠距教學課程的參考。
     The advance of computer and network technology has made it possible for students to flexibly acquire real-time information through distance education, allowing life-long learning. As in previous studies, the researchers found that students generally experienced less instructional interaction in distance education as compared to the traditional classroom setting. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate instructional interactions in synchronous distance education. Based on a literature review and researcher experience, a 36-item interaction scale was developed and administered to 100 students from two different schools. Data were collected and the reliability and validity of the scale were tested. The results showed that the scale had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.901. Factor analysis was used to test the construct validity and 29 items were extracted and divided into seven different interaction factors. These seven factors explained 72.69% of the total variance. Furthermore, the results showed that the scale had good internal consistency and construct validity, and would therefore provide an effective and useful tool for evaluating interaction in synchronous distance education. Use of this instrument can help teachers to understand interactions taking place in a synchronous distance education environment and provide guidance for the future development of distance education programs for various disciplines.
期刊論文
1.Christophel, D. M.(1990)。The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning。Communication Education,39,322-340。  new window
2.Repman, J.、Logan, S.(1996)。Interactions at a Distance Possible Barriers and Collaborative Solutions。Techtrends,41(6),35-38。  new window
3.Fulford, C. P.、Zhang, S.(1993)。Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education。American Journal of Distance Education,7(3),8-21。  new window
4.Hillman, D. C. A.、Willis, D. J.、Gunawardena, C. N.(1994)。Leamer-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners。The American Journal of Distance Education,8(2),30-42。  new window
5.Gunawardena, Charlotte N.、Zittle, Frank J.(1997)。Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment。American Journal of Distance Education,11(3),8-26。  new window
6.唐文華(19990400)。同步互動式遠距教學技術與實施方法研究。教學科技與媒體,44,13-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.岳修平(19990200)。臺灣北區遠距教學實施評估。教學科技與媒體,43,11-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Billings, D. M.(1996)。Distance education in nursing。Computers in Nursing,14(4),211-212。  new window
9.Chen, H. S.、Chen, J. Y.、Guo, F. R.、Chen, C. C.、Chen, L. G.、Lee, M. B.、陳欽雨(1998)。The effectiveness of broad-band distance education system in medical general education。Journal of Medical Education,2(2),144-155。  new window
10.Chen, Y. J.、Willits, F. K.(1999)。Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment。American Journal of Distance Education,13(1),45-59。  new window
11.Cheung, D.(1998)。Developing a student evaluation instrument for distance teaching。遠距教育,19(1),23-42。  new window
12.Chiou, S. F.、Chung, U. L.(2001)。The implementation of distance education in nursing curriculum - 'Principles of Teaching and Learning'。Journal of Medical Education,5(3),187-196。  new window
13.Hwang, M. Y.(1992)。The exploratory of instructional interaction in distance education。Distance Education Forum in Taiwan,5,1-42。  new window
14.Hwang, M. Y.(1994)。The study of instructional interaction behaviors in adult education。Bulletin of Adult and Continuing Education,23,81-107。  new window
15.Sherry, A. C.、Fulford, C. P.、Zhang, S.(1998)。Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction: A quantitative and a qualitative measure。American Journal of Distance Education,12(3),4-28。  new window
16.Thomerson, J. D.、Smith, C. L.(1996)。Student perceptions of the affective experiences encountered in distance learning courses。American Journal of Distance Education,10(3),37-48。  new window
17.Ware, S. K.、Olesinski, R. L.、Cole, C. M.、Pray, M. L.(1998)。Teaching at a distance using interactive video。Journal of Allied Health,27(3),137-141。  new window
18.Young, S. C.、Fey, E. Y.(1998)。A study on the implementation of synchronous interactive distance course。遠距教育,8,25-30。  new window
19.Yueh, H. P.、Lu, G. G.(2000)。An investigation of interactivity in college learning practice。遠距教育,15/ 16,112-117。  new window
圖書
1.Moore, Michael G.、Kearsley, Greg(1996)。Distance education: A systems view。Wadsworth Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top