:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:職業證照管制之政經分析--以「土地登記專業代理人」為例
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:劉祥熹林振民
作者(外文):Liu, Hsiang-hsiLin, Jenn-min
出版日期:2003
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁139-170
主題關鍵詞:政治經濟職業證照利益團體土地登記專業代理人Political economicsOccupational licensureInterest groupConveyancer
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:28
憲法保障人民之工作權,然而,國家為保障民眾權益,也會透過強制力以各種不同的方式介入勞務市場。「職業證照管制」乃是其中相當重要的一項。因為透過證照管制,將會對於執業者的市場帶來正反兩面不同程度的影響。傳統奠基於福利經濟學的市場失靈理論,對於證照管制出現的解釋似乎不盡完整。因證照管制往往牽涉到政治過程之運作,而涉及諸多參與者的利益,因此,本文以利益團體的概念 (concept of interest group) 為基礎,重新架構一個職業證照管制的理論模式。在各個利益團體競逐「管制」這項商品的政治過程中,相關團體皆依其成本效益考量決定其最適之行動模式,透過「管制」需求面與供給面的互動,從而決定出最後均衡的管制產出。此外,與先前文獻不同的是,在各團體的行動中,本文加入「交易成本」觀點 (concept of transaction cost) ,更將公眾利益的考量以「意識型態」的方式加入管制供給者的行動模式之中,以建構出更具有解釋力之證照管制理論模式。本文更將此一模式應用分析於「土地登記專業代理人」證照管制案例中,且啟示頗具效果,值得重視。
The constitution protects the right to work. However, the government may intervene professional market in many ways through coercive power. Occupational licensure is one of the most important one among them, because it brings about enormous influences both positively and negatively on the market. The market failure theory based on traditional welfare economics seems to be incomplete in explaining the occurrence of occupational licensure. Thus, this article reconstructs a theoretical model for occupational licensure based on the concept of interest group theory. In political process where interest groups seek the product of regulation, each group takes its optimal action according to cost-benefit considerations. The interactions between demand side and supply side of regulation determine the equilibrium condition. Differing from earlier studies, this article applies the concept of transaction cost and takes into account the public interest of the supply side under regulation, constructing a more powerful theoretical model. Moreover, this article applies this model to the case of conveyancer and shows how it works well and gives the important implications
期刊論文
1.Coase, R. H.(1937)。The Problem of Social Cost。Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44。  new window
2.Posner, Richard A.(1974)。Theories of Economic Regulation。Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,5(2),335-358。  new window
3.Akerlof, George A.(1970)。The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,84(3),488-500。  new window
4.Stigler, George J.(1971)。The Theory of Economic Regulation。The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,2(1),1-21。  new window
5.Peltzman, Sam(1976)。Toward a More General Theory of Regulation。Journal of Law and Economics,19(2),211-240。  new window
6.Leland, H. E.(1979)。Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards。Journal of Political Economy,87(6),1328-1346。  new window
7.Mitchell, W. C.、Munger, M. C.(1991)。Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey。American Journal of Political Science,35,512-546。  new window
8.Moore, T. G.(1961)。The Purpose of Licensing。The Journal of Law & Economics,4,93-117。  new window
9.尤重道(1995)。從有照與無照土地代書利益衝突鬥法爭權益談土地登記專業代理人制度。臺灣地政,108。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳瑞強(1995)。淺談我國當前土地登記專業代理人制度。臺灣地政,108。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃銘傑(1998)。利益團體與立法過程-以美國公共選擇理論之論點為中心。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(4),677-698。  延伸查詢new window
12.塗惇義(1996)。談日本土地登記專業代理人制度。臺灣地政,130。  延伸查詢new window
13.Graddy, E.(1991)。Towards a General Theory of Occupational Restriction。Social Science Quarterly,72,667-695。  new window
14.Lowery, D.(1987)。The Distribution of Tax Burdens in the American States: The Determinants of Fiscal Incidence。Western Political Quarterly,40(1),137-158。  new window
15.Ryoo, J.(1996)。Lemon Models of Professional Labor Markets Reconsidered。Eastern Economic Journal,22,355-363。  new window
會議論文
1.熊秉元(1991)。「市場活動」和「政治活動」中的交易成本。臺北市。49-68。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.單驥、李誠(1998)。職業證照管制對市場競爭之影響。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳坤芳(1998)。職業證照制度之研究:以證照管制之合憲性為中心,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李.泰勒、張逢沛(1972)。職業社會學。臺北市:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Buchanan, James M.、Tullock, Gordon(1962)。The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundation of Constitutional Democracy。University of Michigan Press。  new window
3.朱敬一、戴華(1997)。教育鬆綁。臺北市:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Stigler, George J.(1991)。人民與國家:管制經濟學論文集。人民與國家:管制經濟學論文集。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York:Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
6.Friedman, Milton、Friedman, R.(1962)。Capitalism and Freedom。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Kuhn, Thomas S.、程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥(1994)。科學革命的結構。臺北市:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.McCormick, R. E.、Tollison, R. D.(1981)。Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy: An Inquiry Into the Interest-group Theory of Govrnment。Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy: An Inquiry Into the Interest-group Theory of Govrnment。Boston, MA。  new window
9.Pigou, A. C.(1959)。The Economics of Welfare。The Economics of Welfare。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象,http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm, 20041207。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE