:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:管理才能評鑑中心評鑑結果與多年度績效之效標關聯效度研究
書刊名:人力資源管理學報
作者:陳啟光陳進財李元墩 引用關係于長禧
作者(外文):Chen, Chi-kuangChen, Chin-tsaiLee, Yuan-duenYu, Chang-hsi
出版日期:2003
卷期:3:4
頁次:頁25-37
主題關鍵詞:評鑑中心管理才能效標關聯效度預測效度Assessment centerManagerial capabilityCriterion-related validityPredictive validity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:240
本文主要目的係探討評鑑中心的管理才能評鑑結果與歷年績效間之效標關聯效度。根據過去相關文獻的回顧,我們發現大部分研究皆偏重於評鑑結果與績效總評之關聯效度,有關多項管理才能評鑑結果與多年度績效間之相關性仍未有深入的探討。因此,本研究嘗試以國內某機車製造公司中階主管的管理才能評鑑結果為研究對象,探討多項能力評鑑結果與多年度績效間之相關性,並利用多年度績效進行管理才能變化之過程趨勢分析。根據資料分析結果顯示,中階主管的管理才能評鑑總評與四年績效總評之相關性高達0.841,而管理才能評鑑總評與各年度績效相關性亦分別介於0.679~0.755之間。此外,以授權能力、問題分析力、控制力等三項管理才能可以解釋本研究評鑑總評70.1%的變異量,其代表的涵義為此三項能力對於中階主管的管理才能具有顯著的預測能力。
The objective of this paper is to investigate the criterion-related validity between the outcomes of an assessment center and the personal annual performance. Most of the previous studies merely focused on the correlation between the assessment outcomes and their performance. It was lack of a deep analysis to explain the trend between the personal annual performance and the assessment outcomes. In this paper, we adopted the assessment outcomes of middle managers from a motorcycle manufacturer as subjects to study the criterion-related validity. The correlation between the personal annual performance and the managerial capability assessment was carefully examined. The results indicated that the correlation between the assessment outcomes and their overall performance was 0.841, and the correlation between the assessment outcomes and their annual performance ranged from 0.679 to 0.755. Moreover, the three managerial capabilities, which indicated empowering, problem solving, and controlling were able to explain 70.1% of total variance. It implied that the three managerial capabilities were effective predicators to their performance later on.
期刊論文
1.張裕隆(20010600)。管理才能測驗發展及信效度分析。應用心理研究,10,65-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳復新(19970500)。評鑑中心法之評鑑工具的選擇與模擬演習的設計。空大行政學報,7,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gaugler, B. B.、Rosenthal, D. B.、Thornton, G. C.、Bentson, C.(1987)。Meta-anlysis of assessment center validity72,493–511。  new window
圖書
1.Drucker, P. F.(1998)。Peter Drucker on the profession of management。  new window
2.莊財安(1991)。企業人力發展實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dessler, Gary(1994)。Human Resource Management。Prentice Hall International Editions。  new window
其他
1.吳復新(1994)。管理人才的評鑑與考選(下)。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳復新(1994)。管理人才的評鑑與考選(上)。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳復新(1994)。管理人才的評鑑與考選(中)。  延伸查詢new window
4.張鐵軍(1999)。管理才能評測中心之採用硏究--以台灣企業爲例。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃一峰(1999)。評鑑中心建構效度之硏究。  延伸查詢new window
6.Boyle, S., Fullerton, J. & Yapp, M.(1993)。The rise of the assessment center: A survey of ac usage in the UK.。  new window
7.Bray, D. W. & Grant, D. L.(1966)。The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management。  new window
8.Byham, W. C.(1986)。The assessment center method and methodology: New applications and technologies。  new window
9.Joiner, D. A.(1984)。Assessment centers in the public sector: A practical approach。  new window
10.Megginson, L. C.(1977)。Personnel & human resources administration。  new window
11.Muchinsky, P. M.(1986)。Personnel selection method.。  new window
12.Muchinsky, P. M.(1990)。Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organzatbnal psychology。  new window
13.Munchas, G. & McArthur, B.(1992)。Revisiting the historical use of the assessment center in management selection and development。  new window
14.Robertson, I. T.(1986)。Assessing managerial potential。  new window
15.Schneider, B. & Schmitt, N.(1986)。Staffing organizations。  new window
16.Thornton, G. C.(1992)。Assessment centers in human resource management。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE