資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.15.235.225)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
To See or Not to See: Another Look at Research on Temporal Trends and Cross-National Differences in Educational Homogamy
書刊名:
臺灣社會學刊
作者:
Wong, Raymond Sin-kwok
出版日期:
2003
卷期:
31
頁次:
頁47-91
主題關鍵詞:
社會流動
;
婚姻
;
教育同質婚配
;
比較研究
;
臺灣
;
Social mobility
;
Marriage
;
Educational homogamy
;
Comparative research
;
Taiwan
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:132
本文透過既有社會流動研究累積的見解,檢視最近一個以教育同質婚配的跨時與跨國分析用於衡量社會開放性的學術辯論。由於辯論雙方在方法論上均存在若干問題,本研究質疑他們對教育同質婚配分析的效度。其中較有疑義之議題包括雙方在教育分類上並不一致,也不相容;教育類別歸屬上的偏誤,以及跨時分析在研究設計上不夠適切。本研究分析台灣從1976至1997年婚配同質性的趨勢,分析的結果進一步挑戰上述雙方的研究發現,同時也對教育同質婚配的變遷研究提供新的洞察視角。資料分析的結果顯示,教育同質婚配模型的各個參數間,存在著非同步性的變異。而且,在教育同質婚配模型中,內在關聯參數的變化呈現一條平滑、細長的U字曲線,意味著地位封閉之論點獲得資料的支持,而不是相關研究所認為的──呈現一個倒U字曲線;一個線性趨勢;或是一個不變模式的各種變化形態。
以文找文
This paper examines a recent critical exchange over cross-national and temporal analysis of educational homogamy to interpret societal openness, drawing on cumulative insights from mobility research. The validity of the findings from both sides of the exchange is questioned on methodological grounds. Issues raised include the use of inconsistent and incompatible classification categories, aggregation bias, and inadequate temporal design. A trend analysis of assortative mating in Taiwan from 1976 to 1997 further challenges the studies' findings and offers new insights into temporal changes in educational homogamy. The results show significant non-synchronous changes in various components of the educational homogamy parameters. Furthermore, the trend for the intrinsic association parameter has an elongated U-shaped form, indicating support for the status closure argument, rather than an inverted U-curve pattern, a linear trend, or invariance, as has been suggested.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Hout, Michael(1988)。More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s。American Journal of Sociology,93(6),1358-1400。
2.
Kalmijn, Matthijs(1994)。Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status。American Journal of Sociology,100(2),442-452。
3.
Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.、Luijkx, Ruud、Treiman, Donald J.(1989)。Intergenerational Class Mobility in Comparative Perspective。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,8,3-84。
4.
Raftery, A. E.(1995)。Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research。Sociological Methodology,25,111-163。
5.
Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。
6.
Goodman, Leo A.(1981)。Criteria for Determining Whether Certain Categories in a Cross-Classification Table Should Be Combined。American Journal of Sociology,87(3),612-650。
7.
Hauser, Robert M.、Grusky, David B.(1984)。Comparative Social Mobility Revisited: Models of Convergence and Divergence in 16 Countries。American Sociological Review,49(1),19-38。
8.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1990)。Understanding Cross-National Variation in Occupational Mobility。American Sociological Review,55,560-573。
9.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1992)。Vertical and Nonvertical Effects in Class Mobility: Cross-National Variations。American Sociological Review,57,396-410。
10.
Hauser, R. M.、Travis, H. P.、Dickinson, P. J.、Koffel, J. N.(1975)。Temporal Change in Occupational Mobility: Evidence for Men in the United States。American Sociological Review,40(3),279-297。
11.
Hauser, R. M.、Dickinson, P. J.、Travis, H. P.、Koffel, J. N.(1975)。Structural Changes in Occupational Mobility among Men in the United States。American Sociological Review,40(5),585-598。
12.
Featherman, D. L.、Jones, F. L.、Hauser, R. M.(1975)。Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the United States: The Case of Occupational Status。Social Science Research,4,329-360。
13.
Garnier, M.、Hout, M.(1976)。Inequality of Educational Opportunity in France and the United States。Social Science Research,5(3),225-246。
14.
Goodman, L. A.、Clogg, C. Clogg(1992)。New Methods for the Analysis of Occupational Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classifications。Contemporary Sociology,21,609-622。
15.
Hout, Michael(1984)。Status, Autonomy, and Training in Occupational Mobility。American Journal of Sociology,89(6),1379-1409。
16.
Kalmijn, M.(1991)。Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy。American Sociological Review,56(6),786-800。
17.
Qian, Zhenchao(1997)。Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage between 1980 and 1990。Demography,34(2),263-276。
18.
Raymo, J. M.、謝宇(2000)。Temporal and Regional Variation in the Strength of Educational Homogamy。American Sociological Review,65(5),773-781。
19.
Smits, J.、Ultee, W.、Lammers, J.(1998)。Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables。American Sociological Review,63(2),264-285。
20.
Smits, J.、Ultee, W.、Lammers, J.(2000)。More or Less Educational Homogamy? A Test of Different Versions of Modernization Theory Using Cross-Temporal Evidence for 60 Countries。American Sociological Review,65(5),781-788。
21.
Ultee, W. C.、Luijkx, R.(1990)。Educational Heterogamy and Father-to-Son Occupational Mobility in 23 Industrial Nations: General Societal Openness or Compensatory Strategies of Reproduction。European Sociological Review,6(2),125-149。
22.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1994)。Postwar Mobility Trends in Advanced Industrial Societies。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,13,121-144。
23.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1995)。Extensions in the Use of Log-Multiplicative Scaled Association Models in Multiway Contingency Tables。Sociological Methods & Research,23(4),507-538。
24.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok、Hauser, R. M.(1992)。Trends in Occupational Mobility in Hungary Under Socialism。Social Science Research,21,419-444。
25.
謝宇(1992)。The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables。American Sociological Review,57(3),380-395。
26.
Yamaguchi, K.(1987)。Models for Comparing Mobility Tables: Toward Parsimony and Substance。American Sociological Review,52(4),482-494。
學位論文
1.
Wong, Raymond Sin-Kwok(1989)。Social Mobility in Industrial Societies: Towards an Understanding of Cross-National and Temporal Stability and Variability,Madison, WI。
圖書
1.
Erikson, R.、Goldthorpe, J. H.(1993)。The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
2.
Wright, Erik Olin(1985)。Classes。New York, NY:New Left Books。
3.
Powers, Daniel A.、Xie, Yu、Powers, D. A.、Xie, Y.(2000)。Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis。San Diego, CA:Academic Press。
4.
Parkin, Frank(1971)。Class Inequality and Political Order: Social Stratification in Capitalist and Communist Societies。New York, NY:Praeger Publishers, Inc.。
5.
內政部(2005)。中華民國臺閩地區人口統計。臺北市:內政部。
延伸查詢
6.
Treiman, D. J.(1977)。Occupational prestige in comparative perspective。New York:Academic Press。
7.
Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。
8.
Armer, M.(1973)。Methodological Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research。Comparative Social Research: Methodological Problems and Strategies。NY。
9.
Muller, W.、Luttinger, P.、Konig, W.、Karle, W.(1990)。Class and Education in Industrial Nations。Class Structure in Europe: New Findings from East-West Comparisons of Social Structure and Mobility。Armonk, NY。
10.
Niessen, M.(1982)。Qualitative Aspects in Cross-national Comparative Research and the Problem of Functional Equivalence。International Comparative Research: Problems of Theory, Methodology, and Organisation in Eastern and Western Europe。London, UK。
11.
Sorokin, P. A.(1959)。Social and Cultural Mobility。New York:Free Press。
12.
Verba, S.(1971)。Cross-National Survey Research: The Problem of Credibility。Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications。Berkeley, CA。
13.
Vermunt, J. K.(1997)。LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data, Version 1.0。LEM: A General Program for the Analysis of Categorical Data, Version 1.0。Netherlands。
其他
1.
Thornton, A.(1992)。Reading History Sideways: The Negative Influence of the Developmental Paradigm on Family and Demographic Research,Ann Arbor, MI。
圖書論文
1.
Lipset, Seymour M.、Zetteberg, Hans L.(1959)。Social Mobility in Industrial Societies。Social Mobility in Industrial Society。Berkeley:University of California Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Transitional Equality in Transnational Context
2.
全球宗教變遷與中國兩個社區的民眾--江蘇和臺灣的比較研究
3.
兩岸高等教育重點發展政策之比較研究--基於臺灣《邁向頂尖大學計畫》與廣東《高水準大學建設計畫》
4.
臺灣階級不平等擴大的原因與後果
5.
海峽兩岸環境權性質比較研究
6.
俄羅斯社會文化慣習對於中小企業創業的影響--兼比較臺俄之間差異
7.
評《臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005:家庭與婚姻》[伊慶春、章英華主編,(臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所,2012)]
8.
遇見另一半:教育婚配過程中的介紹人與接觸場合
9.
臺灣與香港生活與婚姻幸福感的比較研究
10.
嘉南平原沿山熟番移住社會之形成暨其社會生活考察(1760~1945)--以大武壠派社為例
11.
臺海兩地華人家庭圖像的變奏--評Understanding Chinese Families: A Comparative Study of Taiwan and Southeast China [By 朱敬一(Chu, Cyrus C. Y.) and 于若蓉(Yu, Ruoh-Rong). Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2010, 297 pages]
12.
夫家妻家誰較親:比較已婚子女和雙方家長之同住安排及聯絡頻率
13.
回應〈荊棘之路〉
14.
荊棘之路:評喻維欣的臺日女性職涯比較研究 [評:Gendered Trajectories: Women, Work, and Social Change in Japan and Taiwan. By Wei-Hsin Yu. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009, 258 pages]
15.
家庭與婚姻:臺灣心理學研究的現況與趨勢
1.
俄羅斯與台灣的社會文化對中小企業創業之分析
2.
臺灣與法國小學校長學校經營與關係網絡運作之俗民誌研究
3.
台灣佛教寺院,僧尼分布的發展與變遷--以<<同戒錄>>為中心(1949-1987)
4.
台灣與香港幼稚園評鑑制度之比較研究
1.
臺馬兩地客家地緣性社團之發展比較:以大埔(茶陽)同鄉社團為例
2.
臺灣與東南亞客家認同的比較:延續、斷裂、重組與創新
3.
臺灣與墨西哥民主化之比較
4.
論自由結合
5.
合法的放肆還是傳統的守貞
6.
論嫁
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code