:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從律令制的演變看唐宋間的變革
書刊名:臺大歷史學報
作者:高明士
作者(外文):Kao, Ming-shih
出版日期:2003
卷期:32
頁次:頁1-31
主題關鍵詞:律令禮刑將然已然儒家化中華法系罪刑法定主義Law and decreesRites and penal systemWould-be caseHad-been caseConfucianizationSino-law-systemThe principle of punishment according to law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:132
  • 點閱點閱:48
戰國時代至秦漢,是禮刑二分走向禮刑合一的時期,同時由於成文法典的發達,而使禮刑思想融入律令,此時之令為律的追加法。西晉以後,由於士族門閥勢盛,施政以及訂定法制,走向儒家化,於是令成為規定制度,不帶罰則,乃與律兩分;律、令、禮之關係,成為納禮入律、入令,違禮、違令由律處罰,直至賄唐,法典體系大備,甚至形成所謂中華法系 (或謂中國法文化圈)。但宋以後,由於皇權走向獨裁化,鬥閥士族社會解體,敕、律成為行事依據,而令典逐漸趨色,至明初以後,遂無令典。晉、唐至宋後的歷史發展,實亦可由律令法制變遷來理解所謂「唐宋變革」。
From the Warring States to the Qin-Han Times, China had been undergoing a process of combining “Law and Decrees" with ‘Rites and Penal Systems’. Originally they were separate, but with the development of written legal code, the thoughts on “Rites and Penal Systems” were gradually integrated into ‘Law and Decrees’. At this time, decrees were appended into laws. After the Western Jin Dynasty, as the strength of Scholar-Official clan increased, policy. and law making had been Confucianized and Decrees had gradually been formalized. The formal decrees were only regulations, carrying no specific punishment and thus were differentiated from laws and statues. The relationships among the Rites, Decree and Law were as follows: Rites were absorbed into Laws and Decrees. Violation of Rites and Decrees were punishable by the Laws. This practice lasted into Sui-Tang Times. The Law Code System had become more comprehensive and gradually matured into the ‘Sino Law Systems’ (or it may also be called as East Asian Law Cultural Sphere). But since the Song Dynasty, with the development of Chinese despotism, the Scholar-Official Clan society disintegrated. Emperor’s ordinance and law had become the code of behavior and the decrees gradually lost its appeal. From the early Ming Dynasty, there were no formal Decree Codes. The historical development from the Jin- Tang Dynasties to the Song and afterwards, could be understood from the perspective of the change of law and decree system. This is another aspect of the so-called “The Transformation from the Tang to Song Dynasty”.
期刊論文
1.戴建國(1999)。天一閣藏明抄本《官品令》考。歷史研究,1999(3),71-86。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.池田溫(1977)。中國律令官人機構。東京。152-153。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.梁啓超(1971)。中國成文法編制之沿革。台北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.律令研究會(1979)。譯註日本律令五:譯註篇一。譯註日本律令五:譯註篇一。東京。  延伸查詢new window
3.孔慶明(1992)。秦漢法律史。西安陝西:陝西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳寅恪(1981)。隋唐制度淵源略論稿。臺北:里仁書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.戴炎輝(1977)。唐律通論。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
6.王隱。晉書。廣雅書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.虞世南(1978)。北堂書鈔。台北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.栗勁(1985)。秦律通論。濟南:山東人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.仁井田陞(1964)。唐令拾遺。東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
10.張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組(2001)。張家山漢墓竹簡(二四七號墓)。文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.惟宗直本、黑板勝美、國史大系編修會(1974)。令集解。東京:吉川弘文館。  延伸查詢new window
12.瀧川政次郎(1965)。律令の研究。律令の研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.馬作武、楊昂(2001)。泰始年間士族集團的爭鬥與晉律的儒家化。繼承與創新─中國法律史學的世紀回顧與展望。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.武樹臣(1996)。中國傳統法律文化。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(劉宋)范曄。後漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(唐)長孫無忌(1983)。唐律疏議,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(漢)衛宏(1990)。漢舊儀,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(西漢)司馬遷。史記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(東漢)班固。漢書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)魏徵。隋書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.堀敏一(1994)。晉泰始律令の成立。律令制と東アジア世界--私の中國史學。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
2.程樹德(1988)。九朝律考。九朝律考。北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE