:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跆拳道晉段擊破測驗器材與力量之研究
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:洪榮聰相子元 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Jung-tsungShiang, Tzyy-yuang
出版日期:2004
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁225-234
主題關鍵詞:跆拳道功力擊破晉段TaekwondoKicking breaksDan promotion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
本研究置在暸解現行跆拳道晉段擊破項目測試方法及器材可信度進行探討及實驗。以萬能試驗機(Marui丸井牌,日本製)及三點彎曲試驗方法對於晉段用塑膠組合板及木板進行擊破實驗,並分析擊破荷重力量是否穩定。將實驗所得資料以平均數、單因子變異數統計(one-way ANOVA)及重覆量數平均數變異數統計分析斬、舊塑膠組合板擊破差異情形,並以皮爾森線性迴歸統計方法,分析木板重量自變項對荷重作預測。實驗結果如下:新組合板擊破荷重力量平均(193.2公斤)顯著大於舊組合板(123.4公斤),短的次擊破後,荷重力量平均數亦顯著遞減。木板擊破平均荷重力量為566.5公斤,最大荷重786公斤,最小荷重為160公斤。而木板重量最重為1.48公斤,最輕為0.64公斤,木板重量與擊破荷重有顯著相關。從木板重量能夠有效預測荷重,如木板重量為1公斤,荷重力量預測為431公斤。由以上的實驗得知現行擊破項目測驗方法及器材與擊破力量之關係確有顯著差異,因此建議跆拳道協會修正晉段測驗之方法及訂定合理化的晉段標準,並希望未來晉段測驗能使用科學化踢擊力量感測器。
The purpose of this research is to study breaking test methods and equipment in Taekwondo Dan Promotion. This study includes a Universal Testing Machine (Marui brand, made in Japan) by using the three-point bending test method to analyze whether plastic composite boards and boards are stable enough to receive the kicking load. We used one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and repeated measures to analyze the kicking load for the breaking difference between a new composite board and an old composite board. This study used Pearson Regression analyzing the weight of composite boards to predict the independent variable of kicking load. The experimental results was as follows: The average load for a new composite board was 193.2kg, and 123.4kg for an old composite board. After 15-time breakings, the average loads of old and new composite boards have obvious differences and gradually decline on loading. The average kicking load of the boards was 566.5kg. The maximum load was 786kg, and the minimum-kicking load was 160 kg. The heaviest weight of the board was 1.48 kg. The lightest weight was 0.64kg. There was a distinguished relation between the weight of boards and the kicking load. We can effectively calculate the load from the weight of the board. When the weight of the board is 1 kg, for instance, the calculate load will be 431 kg. According to the result, we confirm that there is a distinguished difference between the breaking test methods and equipment. Therefore, we propose the Chinese Taekwondo Association to make changes on testing methods in Dan Promotion and can use this technical breaking tester in the near future.
期刊論文
1.錢紀明、李志文(19840300)。跆拳道腿擊動作速度研究。國民體育季刊,13(1)=60,95-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.豫人(1995)。跆拳道發展史。奧林匹克季刊,31,57-59。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.湯惠雯、湯惠婷、相子元(2000)。跆拳道五種旋踢動作之運動學與動力學分析比較。2000年臺灣生物力學學會年會暨科技研討會。義守大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李勝國(1996)。跆拳道的體能與技術訓練。1996國際運動科學研討會,10。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪榮聰、郭世杰、謝文芳(2002)。中區大專院校跆拳道選手運動傷害調查研究。輔仁大學91學年度體育學術研討會。臺北:輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱聯榮(1998)。跆拳道選手成就動機、注意力型態與狀態性焦慮對成績表現影響之分析研究。彰化:品高圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳國榮(1997)。實用跆拳道。臺北:大展出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1979)。中華民國跆拳道協會紅皮書.跆拳道基本敎材。中華民國跆拳道協會。  延伸查詢new window
4.王惠群、李韻華(2001)。SAS程式設計。台北市:文魁資訊股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳長有、許振聲、陳伯宜(1998)。機械工程實驗。台北:全華科技圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國跆拳道協會(1997)。八十六年全國裁判暨教練講習會手冊。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE