:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電子商務產業資源定位與分群之研究--資源基礎理論觀點
書刊名:資訊管理學報
作者:曾義明 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Yi Ming
出版日期:2004
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁71-90
主題關鍵詞:電子商務資源群組資源基礎理論Electronic commerceResource-based theoryResource group
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:555
  • 點閱點閱:48
本研究旨在以資源基礎理論為核心,探討台灣地區電子商務業者之群組類型,依據資源優勢構面,給展出資源變數間項進行實證研究,結果發現:電子商務產業的資源優勢顯型可以分為四種:即關鍵性技術資源、營運人力素質資源、行銷資源與關係資源。而ASP與ICP業者則由於經營項目的差異,進一步依其所擁有的資源可以分為四種群組。各群組除了其資源特性有顯著差別外,本研究進一步發現擁有不同資源的群組其在經營績效表現上有顯著的差別.ASP業者中具備技術資源的群組績效表現最佳,而ICP 業者中具備行銷資源的業者群組表現較佳,此一結果可能顯示不同管業範圍的業者其產業生命週期階段有所不同,本研究最後依結果提出理論涵意與對電子商務產業的看法。
Based on the resource-based theory, this research analyzes the strategic group of electronic commerce industry according the resource advantage dimensions developed by previous literature. The findings include: The resource advantages in EC industry can be classified into four types: critical1y technique resource. human resources, marketing resource and relationship sources. ASP and ICP firms can be divided into four groups and they are significant different in their resources possessed, furthermore, performance are also different among four groups. Group of firms that owned technique resource performs outstandingly in ASP firms, but the performance of group that owned marketing resources is superior to other groups in ICP firms. This research provides further inferences and practical suggestions at last.
期刊論文
1.Coyne, K. P.(1986)。Sustainable Competitive Advantage--What It Is, What It Is'nt。Business Horzons,29(1),54-61。  new window
2.Wernerfelt, Birger(1995)。A resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after。Strategic Management Journal,16(3),171-174。  new window
3.Black, Janice A.、Boal, Kimberly B.(1994)。Strategic Resources: Traits, Configurations and Paths to Sustainable Competitive Advantage。Strategic Management Journal,15(S2),131-148。  new window
4.Collis, David J.、Montgomery, Cynthia A.(19950700)。Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s。Harvard Business Review,73(4),118-128。  new window
5.Anderson, Erin(1990)。Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance。Sloan Management Review,31(2),19-30。  new window
6.Caves, R. E.、Porter, M. E.(1977)。From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,91(2),241-262。  new window
7.李文瑞、曹為忠、陳弘林(20000400)。我國積體電路廠商策略聯盟與績效關係之研究。企業管理學報,46,151-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Grant, Robert M.(1991)。The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation。California Management Review,33(3),114-135。  new window
9.Cool, K. O.、Schendel, D.(1987)。Performance Differences Among Strategic Group Members。Strategic Management Journal,9,207-233。  new window
會議論文
1.吳青松(1990)。國際策略聯盟與經營績效評估:美國電腦製造業為實例。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許筱雯(1999)。台灣地區國際觀光旅館策略群組與營運績效之實證研究(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cool, K.(1985)。Strategic Group Formation and Strategic Group Shifts: A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982(博士論文)。Purdue University。  new window
3.郭晉榮(1993)。策略組群、經營策略與績效關係之研究:以臺灣區電線電纜業為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.鍾以勇(1997)。臺灣醫院產業策略群組與績效關係之研究,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Aaker, David A.(1995)。Strategic Market Management。John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
2.Hamel, G.、Prahalad, C. K.(1994)。Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
3.吳思華(1996)。策略九說:策略思考的本質。臺北:麥田出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Barney, Jay B.(1997)。Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
5.Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。  new window
6.資策會軟體工業五年計畫工作室(2000)。我國網際服務業調查綜覽。我國網際服務業調查綜覽。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE