:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國同性戀者爭取權益之精緻化發展
書刊名:法令月刊
作者:傅美惠
出版日期:2004
卷期:55:3
頁次:頁38-49
主題關鍵詞:同性戀
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:9
期刊論文
1.Schacter, Jane S.(1994)。The Gay Civil Rights Debate in the States: Decoding the Discourse of Equivalents。Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,29,283-317。  new window
2.(1996)。Developments in the Law-Employment Discrimination。Harvard Law Review,109(7),1568-1627。  new window
3.Yoshino, Kenji(1996)。Suspect Symbols: The Literary Argument for Heightened Scrutiny for Gays。Columbia Law Review,96(7),1753-1834。  new window
4.Amar, Akhil Reed(1996)。Attainder and Amendment 2: Romer' Rightness。Michigan Law Review,95(1),203-235。  new window
5.Strsser, Mark(1991)。Suspect Classes and Suspect Classification: On Discriminating, Unwittingly or Otherwise。Temple Law Review,64(4),937-975。  new window
6.Feldblum, Chai(1996)。Sexual Orientation, Morality, and the Law: Devlin Revisited。University of Pittsburgh Law Review,57,237。  new window
7.Jacobs, Andrw M.(1996)。Romer Wasn't Built in a Day: The Subtle Transformation in Judicial Argument over Gay Rights。Wisconsin Law Review,1996,893-969。  new window
8.Coukos, Pamela(1994)。Civil Rights and Special Wrongs--The Amendment 2 Litigation。Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,29,581+583-584。  new window
9.Niblock, John F.(1993)。Anti-gay Initiative: A Call for Heightened Judicial Scrutiny。UCLA Law Review,41,153-198。  new window
10.Stratter, Mark(1995)。Domestic Relations Jurisprudence and the Great Slumbering Baehr: On Definitional Preclusion, Equal Protection, and Fundamental Interests。Fordham Law Review,64,921。  new window
11.劉幸義(19971100)。同性戀--法學上空白的一頁。月旦法學,30,30-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉靜怡(19971100)。同性戀者之憲法平等權保障--以美國聯邦最高法院Romer V. Evans判決為核心。月旦法學,30,35-48+49。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳宜倩(2004)。司法違憲審查。月旦法學教室,16,127-129。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱堅章(19870125)。人權思想的起源及其基本內涵。中國論壇,23(8)=272,43-48。  延伸查詢new window
15.Gunther, Gerald(1971)。Term-Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Chaging Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection。Harvard Law Review,86(1),1。  new window
16.Sorenaen, Heidi A.(1993)。A New Gay Rights Agenda: Dynamic Statutory Interpretation and Sexual Orientation Discrimination。Georgetown Law Journal,81,2105。  new window
17.張人傑(19971100)。情慾叢結與身體政治--從斷袖、同性戀到酷兒。月旦法學,30,22-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張宏誠(20001200)。「性傾向」(Sexual Orientation)歧視審查基準之研究--從「性別平等」論同性戀者平等權基礎。東吳法律學報,12(2),47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳荔彤(20040100)。美國最高法院同性性行為除罪化與同性婚姻合法化的憲法發展。月旦法學,104,204-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wesel, U.(1984)。Juristische Weltkunde. Eine Einfuehrung in das Recht。Frankfurt。  new window
2.Luettger, H.(1979)。Strafrechts reform und Rechtsvergleichung。Berlin。  new window
3.張宏誠(20020000)。同性戀者權利平等保障之憲法基礎。臺北:學林文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.美國有三十五州明文禁止同性婚姻,http://www.cnn.com/interactive/allpolitics/0307/same.sex.marriages/frameset.exclude.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grossman, Joanna(20030520)。Vermont Civil Unions: Will Sister States Recognize Them? An Early Status Report,http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20030520.html。  new window
3.Grossman, Joanna(20030225)。Should a Surviving "Spouse" in a Same-Sex Couple Be Permitted to Sue for Wrongful Death?,http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20030225.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.張佛泉(1999)。論自由。什麼是自由主義。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE