閘方三角座標試驗法內涵定義明確、嚴謹，雖是陶藝創作者與陶藝教師最常使用的試釉法，但施行程序卻極為繁瑣、耗材與耗時。撤本研究以實驗研究法，探索下列研究目的：(1)發展改進釉方三角座標試驗法的改良方案，(2)實驗與評估改良方案的夜能。研究結論： 1.釉方三角座標試驗法的改良方案有：(1)大間距式、(2)兩階段式與(3)點發散式釉方三角座標試驗法。 　　2.效能評估結果為：(1)兩階段式與點發散式釉方三角座標試驗法，獲得成功釉方比率最高；(2)點發散式釉方三角座標試驗法是最值得使用的試釉法；(3)釉方三角座標試驗法實施程序最嚴謹但最繁瑣；(4)釉方三角座標試驗法適用於檢驗新釉料；(5)兩階段式釉方三角座標試驗法最省材料；(6)大間距式釉方三角座標試驗法最省時間；(7)大間距式釉方三角座標試驗法適合搭配兩階段式釉方三角座標試驗法使用。 　　 研究建議陶藝創作者與學校教師可以本研究為基礎，選用最合適的試驗法實作驗證，以獲致最適合所用作陶情境的釉方；後續研究則建議比較重量比率式與莫耳當量式釉方試驗法。

　　　　　The Triangle coordinate Experiment of Glaze Prescription (TCEGP) is clear and cautious. It is the most frequent way to find glaze prescriptions for ceramic artists and teachers, but is also has complicated procedure. The study used experimental method to explore two purposes: (1)To develop promotive strategies of TCEGP , (2)To experiment and evaluate the effectivenesses of promotive strategies for TCEGP. The results are: 1.The promotive strategies for TCEGP are (1) the Bigger-Space TCEGP, (2) the Two-Step TCEGP, and (3) the Point-Radiation TCEGP. 2.Teh effectiveness evaluations are: (1)The Two-Step TCEGP and Point-Radiation TCEGP found more successful glaze prescriptions, (2)The Point-Radiation TCEGP are the most wrathful for ceramic artists and teachers; (3)The TCEGP has cautious and complicated procedure; (4)The TCEGP is useful for experiment of new glazes; (5)The Two-Step TCEGP is better than others in material restriction; (6)The Bigger-Space TCEGP is the best way to save time; (7)The Bigger-Space TCEGP should be used with the Two-Step TCEGP. The suggestion is that ceramic artists and teachers should use the results and practice TCEGP to find suitable glaze prescriptions for themselves ceramic-making environment.