本研究置在了解國立成功大學運動代表隊學生挫折經驗、挫折忍受力及失敗反應之關係，並進一步作迴歸預測，最後再行探討不同背景的學生，其在挫折經驗、挫折忍受力及失敗反應方面的差異。本研究以國立成功大學運動代表隊的學生為研究對象，其中包括男生117 人，女生84 人。每位受試者以李淑玲所編訂的學生運動代表隊學生挫折經驗、挫折忍受力及失敗反應關係之問卷進行調查，蒐集資料後以因素分析、單因子變異數分析、Scheffe 事後檢定及逐步迴歸進行統計，結果獲得以下結論： （一）不同性別的成大運動代表隊學生之挫折經驗、挫折忍受力及失敗反應之比較，發現男、女性的人際挫折經驗有顯著的差異，男性明顯高於女性；行為反應方面有顯著的差異，女性明顯高於男性。 （二）在不同運動能力的成大運動代表隊學生之挫折經驗、挫折忍受力及失敗反應方面的考驗，發現參加全國級的運動代表隊學生學業行動取向，明顯大於參加校際級的學生；參加全國級的運動代表隊學生整體運動挫折忍受力，明顯大於參加校際組的學生。 （三）成功大學代表隊學生的挫折經驗、挫折忍受力對失敗反應的迴歸方程式如下： 　　1.認真回反應=8. 75+0. 188×整體學業挫折忍受力-0. 33×運動經驗+0.12×運動行動取向+0.10×人際行動取向。 　　2. 行為反應=4.44+0.39×運動情緒感受+0. 37×學業行動取向+0. 24×運動冒險+0.08×人際挫折經驗 　　3. 情意反應=9. 18+0.14×運動挫折經驗+0. 261學業情緒感受-0.38×運動經驗+0.56×人際情緒感受+0. 18×運動行動取向-0. 39×整體人際挫折忍受力 　　4. 整體失敗反應=21. 57+0. 43×整體學業挫折忍受力+0.29×整體運動挫折忍受力-0. 73×運動經驗-0.62×人際冒險+0.41×人際情緒感受 （四）比賽時身體有、無接觸性的運動，在學業行動取向上有顯著的差異，無身體接觸性的運動明顯高於無身體接觸性的運動；另外在運動冒險性上有顯著的差異，有身體接觸性的運動明顯高於無身體接觸性的運動；情意反應有顯著的差異，無身體接觸性的運動明顯高於有身體接觸性的運動。

　　The purpose of this study was to investigate the interrelationship among frustration experience, frustration endurance and failure response of the athletic delegations in National Cheng-kung University (N.C.K.U.). In addition, further regression prediction analysis and comparison among frustration experience, frustration endurance and failure response of students with different background were also performed. Male (n = 117) and female (n=84) subjects of present study were from athletic delegations of N.C.K.U. Subjects were tested with questionnaire designed by Lee for investigating their interrelationship among frustration experience, frustration endurance and failure response. Results were analyzed by using factor analysis, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe's posterior comparisons and stepwise regression. Conclusion: 1. Comparisons of frustration experience, frustration endurance and failure response between different gender showed that interpersonal frustration experience was significantly higher in male subjects then in female subjects. In addition, behavior response was significantly higher in female subjects. 2. Tests in frustration experience, frustration endurance and failure response of subject with different exercise capability showed that national level athletes were significantly higher in study behavior then college level athletes. And, national level athletes were significantly higher in total frustration endurance then college level athletes. 3. The regression formulae of background factor, frustration experience, frustration endurance for failure response were listed below: 　　A. Recognition response = 8.75 + 0.188 × total study frustration endurance - 0.33 × exercise experience + 0.12 × exercise action orientation + 0.10 × interpersonal behavioral orientation 　　B. Behavioral response = 4.44 + 0.39 × exercise emotion perception + 0.37 × study behavioral orientation + 0.24 × exercise venture + 0.08 × interpersonal frustration experience 　　C. Sentimental response = 9.18 + 0.14 × exercise frustration experience + 0.26 × studying emotional perception - 0.38 × exercise experience + 0.56 × interpersonal emotional perception + 0.18 × exercise action orientation -0.39 × total interpersonal frustration endurance 　　D. Total failure response = 21.57 + 0.43 × total studying frustration endurance + 0.29 × total exercise frustration endurance - 0.73 x exercise experience - 0.62 × interpersonal venture + 0.41 × interpersonal emotion perception 4. Non-contacted exercise athletes were higher in studying action orientation then contacted exercise athletes. In addition, contacted exercise athletes were significantly higher in exercise venture then non-contacted exercise athletes. In emotional response, non-contacted exercise athletes showed significantly higher value then contacted athletes did.