臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Results of Student Ratings: Paper vs. Online
書刊名：師大學報. 教育類
作者：張德勝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Te-sheng
出版日期：2004
卷期：49:1
頁次：頁171-185
主題關鍵詞：學生評鑑教師教學；紙筆調查；網路調查；Student rating of instruction；Paper survey；Online survey
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:67
　　　　　本研究主要是比較紙筆調查與網路調查對於「學生評鑑教師教學」結果的差異性。研究對象為九十學年度第一學期國立花蓮師範學院大學部所開設的624門課，包含一年級198(31.73%)門、二年級161(25.80％)、三年級146(23.40%)以及四年級119(19.07％)門，研究工具為「國立花蓮師範學院教學意見反映調查表」共包含四個層面；「準備與計畫」、「教材與內容」、「教法與技巧」、「作業與評鑑」。 研究結果顯示在學生評鑑教師教學所有四個層面及總分，紙筆調查所得的結果都顯著的高於網路調查的結果。在所有的班級中，有573(91.8%)門課，紙筆調查的平均分數高於網路調查的結果。相對的，只有51(3.2%)門課，網路調查的結果高於紙筆調查的結果。研究結果顯示紙筆調查的方式比網路調查的方式，更容易讓學生給任課教師較高的評鑑分數。
　　　　　The purpose of this study was to compare the results of student ratings of their instructors via paper a nd online surveys. The s ample consisted of students a t 624 undergraduate courses at National H ualien Teachers College in the fall semester of 2001:198 (31.73%) freshman courses, 161 (25.80%) sophomore courses, 146 (23.40%) junior courses, and 119 (19.07%) senior courses. The instrument was the Students' Rating of Instructors (SRI) form developed in 1995 at this college. The SRI form was composed of 13 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "strongly agree" (5 points) to "strongly disagree" ( I point). These 13 items were clustered around four teaching factors: Preparation/Planning, Material/Content, Method/Skill, and Assignments/Examination. The scores on these four factors were added to give the total score (rating) for a faculty member. The paper scores are significantly higher than the online scores for all of the evaluation items. There are 573 (91.8%) courses for which the average total paper evaluation score is higher than the average total online evaluation score, but only 51 (8.2%) courses for which the average total online score is higher than the average total paper score. These results indicate that the majority of students in all courses give the instructors a higher score when they evaluate them using the more traditional method: sitting in the classroom and using paper forms.
期刊論文
1.Feldman, K. A.(1993)。College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II--Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers。Research in Higher Education，34，151-211。  new window
2.Marsh, H. W.(1987)。Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research。International Journal of Educational Research，11(3)，253-388。  new window
3.Nimmer, J. G.、Stone, E. F.(1991)。Effects of grading practices and time of rating on student ratings of faculty performance and student learning。Research in Higher Education，32，195-215。  new window
4.Layne, Benjamin H.、DeCristoforo, Joseph R.、McGinty, Dixie(1999)。Electronic versus Traditional Student Ratings of Instruction。Research in Higher Education，40(2)，221-232。  new window
5.Wachtel, H. K.(1998)。Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: A Brief Review。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，23(2)，191-212。  new window
6.Cohen, P. A.(1981)。Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies。Review of Educational Research，51(3)，281-309。  new window
7.Kiesler, S.、Sproull, L. S.(1986)。Response Effects in the Electronic Survey。Public Opinion Quarterly，50，402-413。  new window
8.Centra, J. A.、Gaubatz, N. B.(2000)。Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?。The Journal of Higher Education，71(1)，17-33。  new window
9.Marsh, H. W.、Roche, L.(1993)。The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness。American Educational Research Journal，30(1)，217-251。  new window
10.Wilson, R.(1998)。New Research Casts Doubt on Value of Student Evaluations of Professors。The Chronicle of Higher Education，44(19)，12-14。  new window
11.Wagenaar, T. C.(1995)。Student evaluation of teaching: Some cautions and suggestions。Teaching and Sociology，64，64-68。  new window
12.Berk, R. A.(1979)。The Construction of Rating Instruments for Faculty Evaluation。Journal of Higher Education，50(5)，651-669。  new window
13.Costin, F.(1968)。A graduate course in the teaching of psychology: Description and evaluation。The Journal of Teacher Education，19(4)，425-432。  new window
14.Couch, A.、Keniston, K.(1960)。Yeasayers and Naysayers: Agreeing Response Set as a Personality Variable。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，60，151-174。  new window
15.Erdman, H.、Klein, M.、Greist, J.(1983)。The Reliability of a Computer Interview for Drug Use/ abuse Information。Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation，15，66-68。  new window
16.Evan, W. M.、Miller, J. R.(1969)。Differential effects on response bias of computer versus conventional administration of a social science questionnaire: An exploratory methodological experiment。Behavioral Science，14，216-227。  new window
17.Feldman, K. A.(1977)。Consistency and varability among college students in their ratings among courses: A review and analysis。Research in Higher Education，6，223-274。  new window
18.Feldman, K. A.(1979)。The signficance of circumstances for college student' ratings of their teachers and courses。Research in Higher Education，10(2)，149-172。  new window
19.Martin, C.、Nagao, H.(1989)。Some Effects of Computerized Interviewing on Job Applicant Responses。Journal of Applied Psychology，74(1)，72-80。  new window
20.Phillips, D. L.、Clancy, K. J.(1970)。Some Effects of Social Desirability in Survey Studies。American Journal of Sociology，77(5)，921-940。  new window
21.Rosenfeld, P.、Booth-Kewley, S.(1993)。Computer-administered Surveys in Organizational Settings: Alternatives, Advantages, and Applications。American Behavioral Scientist，36(4)，485-511。  new window
22.Ceci, Stephen J.、Williams, Wendy M.(1997)。"How' M I doing?": Problems with Student Ratings of Instructors and Courses。Change，29(5)，12-23。  new window
會議論文
1.Hardy, N.(2002)。Perceptions of Online Evaluations: Fact and Fiction。New Orleans, LA。  new window
2.Johnson, T.(2002)。Online Student Ratings: Will Students Respond?。New Orleans, LA。  new window
3.Llewellyn, D. C.(2002)。Online reporting of student course survey results-methods, benefits and concerns。New Orleans, LA。  new window
研究報告
1.Hmieleski, K.(2000)。Barriers to Online Evaluation: Surveying the Nation's Top 200 Most Wired Colleges。New York, NY。  new window
2.張德勝(2001)。學生評鑑教師教學－網路調查與紙筆調查之比較研究。花蓮縣花蓮市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.DeCristoforo, J. R.(1992)。Electronic versus traditional administration of student ratings of instruction at the Georgia Institute of technology: A summative analysis(博士論文)。Georgia State University。  new window
圖書
1.Miller, Delbert C.(1991)。Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement。Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
2.Sproull, Lee S.、Kiesler, Sara(1991)。Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
3.Arreola, R. A.、Aleamoni, L. M.(1990)。Practical Decisions in Developing and Operating a Faculty Evaluation System。Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice。San Francisco, CA。  new window
4.Centra, J. A.(1979)。Determinging faculty effectiveness。Determinging faculty effectiveness。San Francisco, CA。  new window
5.Doherty, L.、Thomas, M. D.(1986)。Effects of an automated survey system upon responses。Human factors in organizational design management-II。North Holland。  new window
6.Ory, J.(1990)。Student Ratings of Instruction: Ethics and Practice。Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice。San Francisco, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Seldin, P.(1999)。Current practices "Good and bad" Nationally。Changing practices in evaluating: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions。Bolton, MA：Anker。  new window
2.Chang, T.(2000)。Student ratings: What are teachers college students telling us about them?。Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：784（臺灣：781，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67797562
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上