:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:柏拉圖線喻中的認知對象問題
書刊名:臺大文史哲學報
作者:何畫瑰 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Hua-kuei
出版日期:2004
卷期:60
頁次:頁243-263
主題關鍵詞:柏拉圖線喻認知對象知識理想國PlatoThe analogy of the lineObjects of cognitionKnowledgeThe Republic
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:193
     如果我們相信,從認知對象在存有學上的差異,可以決定所獲得的認知狀態,並由這樣的進路理解柏拉圖《理想國》中的線喻,便必須先確立出四 種不同的存在作為認知對象,分配給線喻中的四個線段,以對這四種對象的存有學解釋的基礎,去理解這個譬喻所要說明的四種認知狀態。然而,這樣的進路將會遇到困難。文中將以陳康、Julia Annas為例,說明這種進路中,很難確定代表各線段的四種隊同認知對象各是什麼,而且往往還須回到認知方式的不同來推測對象;此外,一進路將遭遇下列兩項後果:一是和相同對象可能產生不同認知狀態的事實衝突;另一則是和線喻中間兩線段等長的事實衝突。面對這些困難,文末建議必須透過認和方式去推測、分辨認知對象,以此修正對線喻的解釋。
     This article takes the analogy of the Line in Plato’s Republic as an example, and deals with the relation between objects and cognitive status. In some important interpretations, scholars (e.g. Ludwig C. H. Chen and Julia Annas) attempt to assign four different objects four sections of the basis of epistemology in the analogy of the Line. However, such an approach seems to be improper. For it is difficult to find a consistent assignment of objects for all sections of the Line, especially if we ignore how we reach each cognitive status (represented by each section of the Line). At the same time, it is possible to have the same objects for different cognitive status, and the middle two sections of the Line hold the same length. Thus, a neat ontological assignment of objects might be inconsistent with these two facts. However, if we distinguish the objects by the different methods by which we inquire them, all these troubles will be solved. Therefore, this article suggests that, instead of the ontological difference of objects, it is the different ways of inquiring objects that decide our cognitive status.
圖書
1.Annas, Julia(1981)。An Introduction to Plato's Republic。Oxford。  new window
2.Plato(1994)。理想國。北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.Annas, Julia(1981)。An Introduction to Plato's Republic。An Introduction to Plato's Republic。Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Plato、郭斌和、張竹明(1994)。理想國。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.汪子嵩、范明生、陳村富、姚介厚(1993)。希臘哲學史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.汪子嵩、范明生、陳村富、姚介厚(1993)。希臘哲學史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Shorey, P.(1980)。Plato VI, Republic II。Plato VI, Republic II。Cambridge。  new window
8.Lamb, W. R. M.(1990)。Plato II, Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus。Plato II, Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus。Cambridge。  new window
9.張柯圳(2002)。希臘文化哲學。希臘文化哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Annas, J.(1994)。Introduction a la Republique de Platon。Introduction a la Republique de Platon。Paris, France。  new window
11.Chen, Ludwig C. H.(1992)。Acquiring Knowledge of the Ideas - A Study of Plato's Methods in the Phaedo, the Symposium and the Central Books of the Republic。Acquiring Knowledge of the Ideas - A Study of Plato's Methods in the Phaedo, the Symposium and the Central Books of the Republic。Stuttgart, Germany。  new window
12.Grube, G. M. A.(1997)。Republic。Plato: Complete Works。Idianapolis。  new window
13.Lee, Desmond(1987)。Republic。Republic。London, UK。  new window
14.Sinaiko, H. L.(1965)。Love, Knowledge, and Discourse in Plato: Dialogue amd Dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides。Love, Knowledge, and Discourse in Plato: Dialogue amd Dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides。Chicago, IL。  new window
15.Waterfield, R.(1998)。Plato: Republic。Plato: Republic。London, UK。  new window
16.Plato(1980)。Plato VI, Republic II。Plato VI, Republic II。Cambridge。  new window
17.Plato(1990)。Plato II, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus。Plato II, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus。Cambridge。  new window
18.張柯圳(2002)。希臘文化哲學。希臘文化哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Annas, Julia(1994)。Introduction à la République de Platon。Introduction à la République de Platon。Paris。  new window
20.Chen, Ludwig C. H.(1992)。Acquiring Knowledge of the Ideas-A Study of Plato’s Methods in the Phaedo, the Symposium and the Central Books of the Republic。Acquiring Knowledge of the Ideas-A Study of Plato’s Methods in the Phaedo, the Symposium and the Central Books of the Republic。Stuttgart。  new window
21.Fine, Gail J.(1998)。Knowledge and Belief in Republic V-VII。Plato: Critical Asessments, II。London。  new window
22.(1997)。Republic。Republic。Idianapolis。  new window
23.Plato(1987)。Republic。Republic。London。  new window
24.Sinaiko, Herman L.(1965)。Love, Knowledge, and Discourse in Plato: Dialogue and Dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides。Love, Knowledge, and Discourse in Plato: Dialogue and Dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides。Chicago。  new window
25.(1998)。Plato: Republic。Plato: Republic。Oxford。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fine, Gail(1990)。Knowledge and Belief in Republic V-VII。Epistemology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE