:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論直轄市與縣市公投合併升格
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:王保鍵
作者(外文):Wang, Pao-chien
出版日期:2004
卷期:39
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:地方自治直轄市合併升格自治區域公民投票Local self-governmentMunicipalitiesMergenceThe autonomous regionReferendum
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1538
  • 點閱點閱:27
地方自治有三要素:居民、自治區域、自治權。本文擬就縣市合併所引發之自治區域變革做一探討;闡述在精省後,縣與直轄市都是地方自治層級中第一層級(鄉鎮市為第二層級),「縣」與縣同級之「市」(過去省轄市)為何期待升格為直轄市?為何要合併升格?為何要以公投方式進行?合併升格的過程如何落實「住民自治」? 縣市基於人事權及財政權擴張而期待升格為直轄市,再加入都會社區發展(廣域行政)之共同生活圈之考量乃有縣市與直轄市合併升格之倡議。合併升格有其利,亦有其弊,但在現行法制及政治局勢下,縣市與直轄市並不易合併升格,乃有透過公民透票方式達成之論述。惟回到問題根源,合併升格是不是必然的選項,是不是有其他的機制作為。而在設計地方自治之機制時,應在尊重地方之特殊性的基礎上,以宏觀的國土重劃思維,並以「城市型的地方自治」與「鄉村型的地方自治」概念來調整自治區域。
There are three components to facilitate communalism, which are residents, autonomous regions, and the power of autonomy. This author seeks to discuss the changes in an autonomous region. After the downsizing of the Taiwan Province, the counties and metropolitan cities become equal as the first same level of communalism, while the hsians, townships and cities are the second level of communalism. Why do the counties, along with the cities (the provincial cities before) equivalent in their level to the counties, wish to be promoted as metropolitan cities? Why does this have to be done by referendum? And, how do they consolidate the principle of “resident autonomy” in the process of “mergence and promotion”? Since the counties and cities seek to expand their powers in personnel and finance after their promotion to metropolitan cities, and they prefer to organize their “common living circle” after metropolitan community development (wide-ranged administration), they tend to pursue their mergence and promotion. There are also benefits and demerits in this process. It is not easy for counties and cities to merge with metropolitan cities under the current legal institution and political atmosphere. As a result, they tend to fulfill their wish to merging by referendum. Hence when we trace back to where the problems are, it is apparent that mergence and promotion is not the only option for how their wish comes true. We also explore other possible mechanisms in this study.
期刊論文
1.黃俊杰(200205)。財政國與課稅收入之立法。月旦法學,84,81-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葛克昌(20020500)。統籌分配稅與地方自治。月旦法學,84,77-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭永年、吳國光(1994)。論中央-地方關係:中國制度轉型中的一個軸心問題。當代中國研究,45,4-121。  延伸查詢new window
4.Elazar, Daniel J.(1980)。The Political Theory of Covenant: Biblical Origins and Modern Developments。Publius: The Journal of Federalism,10(4),3-30。  new window
5.沈立人、戴園晨(1990)。我國「諸侯經濟」的形成及其弊端和根源。經濟研究,1990(3),12-19。  延伸查詢new window
6.王保鍵(2001)。地方自治立法權中關於自治條例之研究。立法院院聞,29(11),85-94。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳清秀(2002)。論新版(馬版)財政收支劃分制度之妥當性與可行性。月旦法學,84,95-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.董翔飛(1990)。地方自治與政府。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1998)。Provincial Strategies of Economic Reform in Post-Mao China: Leadership, Politics, and Implementation。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Chandler, J. A.(1991)。Local Government Today。Manchester University Press。  new window
4.Beer, Samuel H.(1993)。To Make a Nation: The Rediscovery of American Federalism。Cambridge, Mass.:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
5.紀俊臣(1999)。精省與新地方制度--始末、設計、發展系論。台北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Held, David(1996)。Models of Democracy。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
7.張正修(2000)。地方制度法理論與實用。學林文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳庚(2003)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.趙永茂(1997)。中央與地方權限劃分的理論與實際:兼論台灣地方政府的變革方向。台北:翰蘆圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.薄慶玖(1997)。地方政府與自治。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1993)。The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era。The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era。London, UK/ Newbury Park, CA。  new window
12.(1990)。Challenges to Local Government。Challenges to Local Government。London, UK/ Newbury Park, CA。  new window
13.張正修(2003)。地方制度法理論與實用,第二冊:本論(I)。地方制度法理論與實用,第二冊:本論(I)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃錦堂(2001)。臺北市自治權之司法保障之研究。地方自治法2001。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡秀卿(2003)。里長延選案法律鑒定意見書。全民健保釋憲案及里長延選釋憲案紀錄彙編。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.董保城(2001)。教育事項中央與地方權限之劃分與分工。地方自治法2001。臺北市:臺北市政府法規委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡茂寅(2001)。地方預算財政問題初探。地方自治法2001。臺北市:臺北市政府法規委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE