資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.133.126.199)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
臺灣向國際海洋法法庭申訴之研究
書刊名:
臺灣國際法季刊
作者:
蒲國慶
作者(外文):
Pu, Kuo Ching
出版日期:
2004
卷期:
1:4
頁次:
頁139-218
主題關鍵詞:
國際海洋法法庭
;
聯合國海洋法公約
;
捕魚實體
;
區域漁業組織或安排
;
締約當事者
;
主管轄
;
從管轄
;
屬人管轄
;
事務管轄
;
參加
;
諮詢管轄
;
訴訟管轄
;
當事人適格
;
The international tribunal for the law of the sea
;
The United Nations convention on the law of the sea
;
Fishing entities
;
Regional fishery organizations or arrangements
;
Contracting parties
;
Principal jurisdiction
;
Incidental jurisdiction
;
Jurisdiction in personam
;
Jurisdiction ratione materiae
;
Intervene
;
Advisory jurisdiction
;
Contentious jurisdiction
;
Locus standi
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
8
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
8
共同引用:
24
點閱:115
「一九八二年聯合國海洋法公約」創設國際海洋法法庭,一九九六年成立於德國漢堡。法庭管轄範圍不限於公約締約當事者,尚開放非締約國家和實體使用;此與傳統國際司法機關管轄範圍限於國家(States)者不同,為其特色。台灣不是締約當事者,且囿於國際現實,往往在國際社會被視為非國家「特類實體」(entity sui generis),台灣有無機會向國際海洋法法庭申訴(access)呢?此為本文目的。國際海洋法法庭是否受理台灣申訴案件的議題與當代國際漁業法的發展息息相關。本文第一部分先就研究重點及架構作一介紹,第二部分從國際海洋法的發展觀點出發,針對海洋法公約和魚群協定為基礎構成的當代國際漁業法規析論國際間海洋生物資源的養護和管理已到了必須國際社會所有參與者合作管理,否則難收實效;而台灣身為六大遠洋捕魚國家以及國際間指稱的捕魚實體,有機會參與相關區域漁業管理組織之養護和管理工作,以善盡國際義務。第三部分研議海洋法公約和二○○一年十二月十一日生效的魚群協定之爭端解決機制,以及該爭端解決機制適用範圍,是否涵蓋非國家「捕魚實體」或「實體」。第四部分述及國際社會接納捕魚實體參與區域漁業管理組織工作的實踐,說明此為發展趨向。第五部分針對法庭管轄權限,研究台灣作為捕魚實體向法庭申訴之法理和可行性以及可能挑戰。最後,第六部分從海洋法發展趨勢和國際實踐提出總結,指出台灣已有機會參與區域漁業管理組織工作,透過組織提供之爭端解決機制,於與爭端會員達成協議下,德選擇向國際海洋法法庭申訴並應獲得受理,此應為國際海洋法發展趨向。台灣倘能暫時拋開「主權國家」堅持,以「特類實體」地位的現實,接受國際間認知的「捕魚實體」身分向法庭申訴。在此包裝下,可避開敏感主權爭議所致的政治困難,致法庭礙難受理。鑒於法庭作為國際間最高常設海事法庭以及管轄權及於非國家實體的事實,台灣倘能避開政治爭議,從國際海洋法有關養護和管理生物資源的工作需要所有參與者共同努力的觀點切入爭取,台灣是有機會的。
以文找文
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, with its seat in Hamburg, Germany, was established in 1996 by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the Convention). The Tribunal may exercise jurisdiction not only on the contracting parties to the Convention, but also on non-contracting parties and entities that confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal. This is in difference from the International Court of Justice, the Statute of the Court provides that only states may be parties to cases before the Court. Based on this legal fact, will Taiwan, a reputed fishing entity and non-party to the Convention, have the access to the Tribunal? This paper discusses the possibility. The question whether Taiwan will have the access to the Tribunal is closely related to the fishery issues for the law of the sea. This paper, divided into six parts, gives its research structure in Part Ⅰ, and an account of the development of International law of the sea in Part Ⅱ, arguing that effective conservation and management measures of living resources whose interpretation and application is subject to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal need cooperation from all actors, states and entities. Taiwan is a major distant water fishery player, shall cooperate with others for such purpose, enshrined in the Convention. Part Ⅲ focuses discussion on the dispute settlement provisions of the Convention and of the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. Article 30 of the Agreement illustrates the rules by reference to the dispute settlement provisions of the Convention with respect to disputes between the states parties concerning the interpretation or application of that Agreement or concerning the interpretation or application of a regional fisheries agreement relating to straddling fish stocks or highly migratory fish stocks. In Part Ⅳ, this paper devotes to the practice of fisheries agreements that establish regional fisheries organizations (RFOs), demonstrating that for effective conservation and management, fishing entities have been accorded chances along with state to participate in the work of RFOs in a meaningful way. Part Ⅴ discusses the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, focusing on article 288 of the Convention and article 20, paragraph 2, and article 21 of the Statute. The question whether the Tribunal will have jurisdiction on cases to which Taiwan, a reputed fishing entity, is a party will also be examined, along with challenges ahead. Part Ⅵ concludes that the Tribunal has jurisdiction over a dispute to which Taiwan is a party, bearing in mind the purpose and objective of the Convention. The fact that the Tribunal shall be open to entities in any case submitted pursuant to any other agreement conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal which is accepted by all the parties to that case seems provide a promising vehicle to Taiwan. To achieve the goal, Taiwan should refrain from political motivation while seeking judicial settlement of a dispute before the Tribunal, or in any way incompatible with the status or competence of a fishing entity.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Kwiatkowska, Barbara(200106)。The Australia and New Zealand v Japan Southern Bluefin Tuna (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) Award of the First Law of the Sea Convention Annex VUU Arbitral Tribunal。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,16(2),239-293。
2.
俞寬賜(20000128)。沿海國家間的海域劃界法制之研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,29(2),1-41。
延伸查詢
3.
姜皇池(19990700)。論海洋科學研究之國際法規範。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,28(4),67-128。
延伸查詢
4.
Boyle, Alan E.(1999)。Problems of Compulsory Jurisdiction and the Settlement of Disputes Relating to Straddling Fish Stocks。International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,14(1),1-26。
5.
Oxman, Bernard H.(1996)。Observations on Vessel Release under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea。Special Issue of The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,11(2)。
6.
Oxman, Bernard H.(200001)。International Decisions(The M/V "Saiga", No. 2 and Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases Nos, 3 and 4)。The American Journal of International Law,94(1)。
7.
Drew, Catriona(200109)。The East Timor Story: International Law on Trial。European Journal of International Law,12(4)。
8.
Editors' Note(2004)。Former Legal Advisers' Letter on Accession to the Law of the Sea Convention。American Journal of International Law,98(2)。
9.
Charney, J, I.(199601)。The Implications of Expanding International Dispute Settlement Systems: The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea。The American Journal of International Law,90(1)。
10.
Van Dyke, Jon M.(1995)。Modifying the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention: New Initiatives on Governance of High Seas Fisheries Resources: the Straddling Stocks Negotiations。International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,10(2),219-227。
11.
(200005)。Judgment of the "Camouco" case (Panama v. France), Application for Prompt Release, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, International Legal Materials。The American Society of International Law,39。
12.
Sohn, Louis B.(1995)。Settlement of Law of the Sea Disputes。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,10(2)。
13.
de la Fayette, Louise(200008)。ITLOS and the Saga of the Saiga: Peaceful Settlement of a Law of the Sea Dispute。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,15(3)。
14.
Kibel, Paul S.(2000)。Alone at Sea: Chile's Presencial Ocean Policy。Journal of Environmental Law,12(1),43-64。
15.
Barston, R.(1999)。The Law of the Sea and Regional Fisheries Organizations。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, p,14(3),345。
16.
Lagoni, Rainer(199605)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Establishment and "Prompt Release" Procedures。Special Issue of The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,11(2)。
17.
Murphy, Sean D.(200101)。Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International law。American Journal of International Law,95(1)。
18.
Aqorau, T.(200109)。Tuna Fisheries Management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean: A Critical Analysis of the 2000 Convention。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Kluwer Law International,16(3)。
19.
Mensah, Thomas A.(1998)。The Dispute Settlement Regime of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea。Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law,307-323。
20.
Onorato, William T.、Valencia, Mark J.(2000)。The New Gap Treaty: Legal and Political Implications。ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal,Spring。
21.
Song, Yann-huei、Zou, Keyuan(2000)。Maritime Legislation of Mainland China and Taiwan: Developments, Comparison, Implications, and Potential Challenges for the United States。Ocean Development & International Law,31(4),303-345。
22.
Rosenne, Shabtai(1988)。International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: 1996-97 Survey。The International Journal of Marine and Coastal,13(4),487-514。
會議論文
1.
丘宏達(200010)。國際法學會第六十八屆大會報告。國際法學會第六十八屆大會。台北:中國國際法學會。
延伸查詢
2.
Mensah, Thomas A.(1998)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Promotion of a Legal Order in the Oceans。The 68th Conference of the International Law Association,(會議日期: May 24, 30, 1998)。Chinese Society of International Law--Chinese (Taiwan) Branch of the International Law Association。62-79。
圖書
1.
Higgins, Rosalyn(1994)。Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
2.
Merrills, J. G.(1991)。International Dispute Settlement。Cambridge:Grotius Publications Limited。
3.
雷崧生(1970)。國際法院成案。台北:正中書局。
延伸查詢
4.
Collier, John、Lowe, Vaughan(1999)。The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures。Oxford University Press。
5.
Ragazzi, Maurizio(1997)。The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes。Oxford:Clarendon Press:Oxford University Press。
6.
姜皇池(200109)。國際海洋法總論。台北:學林文化事業有限公司。
延伸查詢
7.
Shany, Y.(2003)。The competing jurisdictions of international courts and tribunals。Oxford。
8.
張永恆(1977)。國際法院。台北:正中書局。
延伸查詢
9.
陳隆志(199909)。國際法導引。台北:元照出版公司。
延伸查詢
10.
傅崑成(200108)。聯合國海洋法公約。台北:協容國際顧問有限公司。
延伸查詢
11.
Boyle, Alan E.、Freestone, David(1999)。International Law and Sustainable Development。Oxford University Press。
12.
Joyner, C. C.(1999)。The United Nations and International Law。Cambridge University Press。
13.
Romano, Cesare P. R.(2000)。The Peaceful Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: A Pragmatic Approach。Kluwer Law International。
14.
Hey, Ellen(1999)。Developments in International Fisheries Law。Kluwer Law International。
15.
Caminos, H.(2001)。Law of the Sea。Ashgate Publishing Limited。
16.
Scheiber, Harry N.(2000)。Law of the Sea: The Common Heritage and Emerging Challenges。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
17.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(1998)。Yearbook 1997。Kluwer Law International。
18.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(1999)。Yearbook 1998。Kluwer Law International。
19.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea(2001)。Yearbook 2000。Kluwer Law International。
20.
Klabbers, Jan(1996)。The Concept of Treaty in International Law。Kluwer Law International。
21.
Hjertonsson, Karin(1973)。The New Law of the Sea: Influence of the Latin American States on Recent Developments of the Law of the Sea。Stockholm:Gotab AB。
22.
Guruswamy, Lakshman D.(1999)。International Environmental Law and World Order。St. Paul., Minn.:West Group。
23.
Nordquist, Myron H.、Moore, John Norton(2000)。Current Fisheries Issues and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
24.
Nordquist, Myron H.、Moore, John Norton(1999)。Oceans Policy。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
25.
Clingan, Thomas. A. Jr.(1994)。The Law of the Sea: Ocean Law and Policy。San Francisco。
26.
United Nations, Summaries of Judgments(1992)。Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice, 1948-1991。United Nations Publication。
27.
United Nations, Summaries of Judgments(1998)。Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice, 1992-1996。United Nations Publication。
28.
邱宏達(2000)。現代國際法。臺北:三民書局。
延伸查詢
29.
陳治世(1983)。國際法院。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
延伸查詢
30.
VICUNA, FRANCISCO ORREGO(1999)。THE CHANGING INTERNATIONAL LAW OF HIGH SEAS FISHERIES。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
31.
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie、Sohn, Louis B.(1996)。The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations。London:Kluwer Law International。
32.
Stokke, Olav Schram(2001)。Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
33.
Eiriksson, Gudmundur(2000)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
34.
Shabtai, Rosenne(1989)。Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945-1986。Cambridge University Press。
35.
王鐵崖、王人傑(1992)。國際法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
延伸查詢
36.
陳治世(19920000)。條約法公約析論。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
延伸查詢
37.
Churchill, Robin Rolf、Lowe, Alan Vaughan(1999)。The Law of the Sea。Manchester University Press。
其他
1.
(19960419)。外交部新聞。
延伸查詢
2.
(19960516)。行政院新聞局新聞。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
Boyle, Alan E.(1998)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Settlement of Disputes。The Changing World of International Law in the Twenty-first Century: A Tribute to the Late Kenneth R. Simmonds。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。
2.
Vukas, B.(2001)。Some Features of the New International Judicial Institution。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。Kluwer Law International。
3.
Nelson, Dolliver(1999)。The Development of the Legal Regime of High Seas Fisheries。International Law and Sustainable Development。Oxford University Press。
4.
Nelson, Dolliver(2001)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Some Issues。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。Kluwer Law International。
5.
Caminos, H.(1999)。The Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: An Overview。Oceans Policy: New Institutions, Challenges and Opportunities。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
6.
Akl, Joseph(2001)。The Seabed Disputes Chameber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。Kluwer Law International。
7.
Rayfuse, Rosemary(1999)。The Interrelationship between the Global Instruments of International Fisheries Law。Developments in International Fisheries Law。Kluwer Law International。
8.
Mensah, Thomas A.(1999)。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The First year。Oceans Policy: New Institutions, Challenges and Opportunities。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。
9.
Treves, Tullio(2001)。The Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea。Kluwer Law International。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
論多邊投資協定中與GATT第21條相仿的國家安全條例外條款--以《俄羅斯-過境轉運案》為可比較之法律標準
2.
女性主義觀點下的國際法--以海洋法為例
3.
國際訴訟準備的一般性考量
4.
南海仲裁案中的國際環境法議題
5.
論南太平洋區域性漁業管理組織:兼論臺灣參與困境與展望
6.
「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究
7.
國際法院首位中國籍法官徐謨(1893~1956):生平及貢獻
8.
論國際海洋法法庭中之臨時措施
9.
論《美國輸臺牛肉議定書》事件
10.
論《美國輸臺牛肉議定書》事件
11.
從兩岸經濟合作架構協議簽署論我國行政立法關係
12.
從國際法觀點論錫金王國之滅亡
13.
以「實體」做為國際海洋法條約規範主體的理論與實踐:以臺灣參與區域性漁業管理組織之實踐為中心
14.
聯合國改革與國際法院行政司法管轄權的檢視
15.
兩岸共同參與政府間國際組織之經驗
1.
從國際海洋法中半閉海合作觀點論東海海域爭端之解決
2.
事實婚法制之研究
3.
從國際海洋劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ與大陸架劃界問題─以黃海和東中國海劃界問題為中心─
1.
經濟全球化背景下中國外商投資企業法制的發展:開放與管制政策思維之牽動
2.
國際法學原理:本質與功能之研究
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code