:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Legal Implications of Obligations Erga Omnes and the Relevance on Enforcing Marine Endangered Species Protection under the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:洪思竹 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Szu-chu
出版日期:2004
卷期:1:4
頁次:頁245-272
主題關鍵詞:國際環境法國際法上的共同法律責任海洋瀕危物種保護聯合國海洋法公約國際法下的國家片面執法措施海洋環境保護Obligations erga omnesActio popularisInternational environmental lawCommon legal responsibilityMarine endangered species protectionUN convention on the law of the seaUnilateral enforcement measuresMarine environmental protection
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:18
自1972年的聯合國斯德哥爾摩環境會議以至1992年的里約地球高鋒會以來,國際環境法律的架構歷經了眾所周知的重大擴充與發展。這些發展中的重點之一是宣示了國際社會的所有成員國對於人類社會的某些共同環境議題如全球海洋環境的污染防止,以及瀕臨滅絕物種保護等是承擔著共同的國際法律責任。然而在此高遠的目標之下,吾人所需處理的法律難題在於傳統國際公法的既有原理原則對於個別國家以片面措施執行其領域外的國際環境保護大體是採取負面或保守的立場。針對此一國際法上國家片面執行共同環境保護的法律基礎問題,本文特別析論國際法院在Barcelona Traction一案中所提出,在國際法學界廣為論辯,的Obligation Erga Omnes概念意涵。並進而以此概念意涵的析論為基礎,延伸探討其在現今國際海洋法中對國家執行1982聯合國海洋法公約下的海洋物種保護義務此一重要議題所產生的啟發。總結之處,本文提出Obligation Erga Omnes的意涵延伸已為各別國家執行全球海洋物種保護的片面措施發動上,提供了傳統國際法長期以來所欠缺的一個合理、可引以為據的法律基礎。
It is well-recognized in literature that developments stemming from the 1972 UN Conference on Human Environment (UNCHE), and subsequently the 1992 Rio Earth Summit significantly trans-formed and strengthened the regulatory framework of international environmental law. One major aspect among these developments is the recognition that community of States must undertake common legal responsibility to protect common environment such as the prevention of marine pollution and protecting endangered species. Despite such positive progression in international environmental law, it is nonetheless a well-recognized deficiency that traditional international law does not provide a legal basis for an individual State to take enforcement measures for protecting the environment beyond its national jurisdiction. As regards the problem concerning the legal basis for individual States to take unilateral enforcement measures pursuant to common environment protection such as marine endangered species protection, this article analyses and articulates the significance of the highly controversial concept of obligations erga omnes implied by the International Court of Justice in the Barcelona Traction case. This article then extends the analysis of those legal implications and elaborates how those legal implications relate to the enforcement of obligations for marine endangered species protection under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Finally, this article concludes that, in terms of unilateral enforcement of marine endangered species protection under the 1982 UNCLOS, legal implications of obligations erga omnes have provided substantial progressions in this regard. As Taiwan becomes more aware of the importance of enforcing the protection of marine environment, those progression suggested by this article should not be overlooked.
期刊論文
1.Thirlway, Hugh(1995)。The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989 (Part One to Part Ten)。British Year Book of International Law,66,1-96。  new window
2.Bilder, R.(1981)。The role of unilateral State action in preventing international envi ronmental injury。Vanderbilt J Transnat'l L,14,51。  new window
3.Briggs, H.(1971)。Barcelona Traction: the jus standi of Belgium。AJIL,65,327-345。  new window
4.Dupuy(1991)。Humanity and the Environment。Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy,2,202。  new window
5.Frowein, J.(1994)。Reactions by not directly affected States to breaches of public international law。Hague Recueil,248,353。  new window
6.Kirgis(1990)。Standing to Challenge Human Endeavours That Could Change the Climate。AJIL,84,525。  new window
7.Leigh, K.(1993)。Liability for Damage to the Global Commons。Australian Yearbook of International Law,,14,129-156。  new window
8.Mercer, P.(1983)。The Citizen's Right to Sue in the Public Interest: the roman actio popularis revisited。University of Western Antario Review,21,89-103。  new window
9.Simma, B.(1994)。From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law。Hague Recueil,250,217。  new window
10.Valencia-Ospina(1994)。The International Court of Jurtice and International Environmental Law。Asian Yearbook of International Law,2,3。  new window
11.Weiss, Eidth Brown(1984)。The Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity。Ecology Law Quarterly,11(4),495-581。  new window
圖書
1.Ragazzi, Maurizio(1997)。The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes。Oxford:Clarendon Press:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.American Law Institute(1990)。Restatement of the Law Third: the foreign relations law of the United States。  new window
3.Byers, M.(1999)。Custom, Power and Power of Rules: international relations and customary international law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Guruswamy, Palmer、Weston(1994)。International Environmental Law and World Order: a problem-oriented coursebook。  new window
5.Hey, Ellen(1999)。Developments in International Fisheries Law。  new window
6.Kwiatkowska, B.(1989)。The 200 Mile Exclusive Economic Zone in the New Law of the Sea。  new window
7.Nordquist, M. H.(1985)。United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982: a commentary。Dordrecht:London:Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
8.Birnie, Patricia、Boyle, Alan、Redgwell, Catherine(2002)。International Law and the Environment。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.De Hoogh, A.(1996)。Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes--A Theoretical Inquiry into the Implementation and Enforcement of the International Responsibility of States。Hague:Kluwer Law International。  new window
10.Henkin, Louis(1995)。International Law: Politics and Values。Dordrecht:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
11.O'CONNELL, D. P.、Shearer, Ivan(1982)。THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Sands, P.(1995)。Principles of International Environmental Law: Volume I Frameworks, standards and implementation。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
13.Schachter, Oscar(1991)。International Law in Theory and Practice。Dorfrecht:Norwell, Massachussets:Boston:London:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
14.Churchill, Robin Rolf、Lowe, Alan Vaughan(1999)。The Law of the Sea。Manchester University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Anton, D.(1997)。Law for the sea's biological diversity。Politics, Values, and Functions: intermational law in the 21st century: essays in honor of Professor Louis Henkin。  new window
2.Brownlie, I.(1974)。A survey of international customary rules of environmental pro tection。International Environmental Law。  new window
3.Chamey, J.(1990)。Third state remedies for environmental damage to the world's common spaces。International Responsibility for Environmental Harm。  new window
4.Chowdhury(1995)。Common but Differentiated State Responsibility in International Environment Law: from Stockholm to Rio。Sustainable Development and Good Governance。  new window
5.Dupuy, P.、Raeemond-Gouilloud, M.(1991)。The Preservation of the Marine Environment。A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea。  new window
6.Gaja, G.(1989)。Obligations Erga Omnes, International Crimes and Jus Cogens: a tentative analysis of three related concepts。International Crimes of State: a critical analysis of the ILCs draft article 19 on state responsibility。  new window
7.Harrison, C.(1985)。Costs to the United States in Environmental Protection and Marine Scientific Research by Not Joining the Law of the Sea Convention。Consensus and Confrontation: The United States and the Law of the Sea Convention。  new window
8.Rusina, N.(1985)。International Legal Principles of Protection of the Marine Environment Against Pollution。The Law of the Sea and International Shipping: Anglo-Soviet Post-UNCLOS Perspectives。  new window
9.Singh, G.(1992)。The greenhouse effect--need for legal control, in International Law in Transition。Essays in Memory of Judge Nagendra Singh。  new window
10.Stone, C.(1993)。Defending the global commons。Greening International Law。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE