:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《昭昧詹言》以文法評詩的特色與評論意義
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:楊淑華
作者(外文):Yang, Shu-hua
出版日期:2005
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁243-268
主題關鍵詞:方東樹昭昧詹言以文法評詩詩論
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:29
「以文論詩」是方東樹詩論的重要特徵,自郭紹虞以來,近代學者相繼討論,但多止於現象分析,未能聯繫其詩論內涵,深究此論述特徵的意義。本文試圖追溯方東樹創作論的基礎觀念,並籠罩全書批評體例、論述形式、與撰著者學術性格…等多元視野,結合考試制度、詩文評點等社會因素,期能重新觀察《昭昧詹言 》中「以文法評詩」的特殊現象,討論其呈現的評論意義。因而得知:「絕去蹊徑、別具隻眼」的創作意識,不但是宋代詩學為現代學者所公推的核心觀念,更啟發了方東樹等清代詩人的創作自覺,衍生為詩論中詩藝特質、創作原理的討論;至於,著眼於教學實際而會通文法、詩藝用語,精細於章法結構的釐析,則是 方東樹等後代詩論家的創變所在,亦可視為對宋代詩學的創意詮釋。凡此二者,乃本文在探討《昭昧詹言》以文法評詩特色後可歸結的詩學發展意義。
Modern scholars have discussed Fang Tung-shih's theory of poetry, which is characterized by his conviction that “poetry should be analyzed on the basis of the text,” since Kuo Shao-yu brought up the opinion. Most of these scholars, however, limit themselves to analysis of phenomena, and fail to connect with the content of Fang's theory and deeply probe the characteristic meaning of his ideas. This paper seeks to trace the fundamental ideals behind Fang's theory of art, and, by looking from multiple angles such as the book's critical style, discourse, forms, and the author's scholarly personality, etc., and incorporating social factors such as the examination system and critical literary commentary, attempts to re-examine the special phenomenon of “using grammar to analyze poetry” in the “Shao Mei Chan Yen,” and discuss this phenomenon's significance. It can be seen that the artistic meaning of “abandon the narrow path, maintain an original opinion” is not only is what modern scholars have generally put forth as the core of Song Dynasty poetic theory, but also what inspired the creative self-awareness of Fang Tung-shih and other Qing Dynasty poets. This is expanded into a discussion of creative principles and poetic characteristics in the theory of poetry. The novel aspect of Fang Tung-shih and other later poetry critics was their attention to teaching practice, their understanding of grammar and poetic terminology, and their expertise at analyzing phrasing and structure; this can also be seen as the innovative interpretation of Song Dynasty poetry. These two things are significant aspects of the development of poetry criticism that can be gleaned from an exploration of the way grammar is used to analyze poetry in the “Shao Mei Chan Yen.”
期刊論文
1.楊淑華(20000600)。「詩文一理,取徑不同」--姚鼐「以文論詩」觀點釐析。臺中師院學報,14,269-291。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳宏一(19880600)。方東樹「昭昧詹言」析論。國立編譯館館刊,17(1),49-76。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂肖奐(1995)。從「法度」到「活法」--江西詩派內部機制的自我調節。復旦學報(社會科學版),1995(6),83-88。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭正宜(1993)。方東樹詩學源流及其美感取向之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝錫偉(1994)。方東樹詩論研究(碩士論文)。香港浸信會學院,香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.金鎬(1997)。方東樹文論研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊淑華(2004)。方東樹昭昧詹言及其詩學定位(博士論文)。國立成功大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭倖宜(2001)。活法與宋詩(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.夏紹碩(1984)。古典詩詞藝術探幽。臺北:漢京文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.方東樹(1983)。方植之全集。台北:明文。  延伸查詢new window
3.童慶炳(2001)。文學活動的審美維度。北京:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.方東樹、汪紹楹(1984)。昭昧詹言。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.伍蠡甫、胡經之(1987)。西方文藝理論名著選編。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.張健(2001)。元代詩法校考。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.方東樹、吳闓生(1987)。昭昧詹言。台北市:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.方東樹(2001)。攷槃集文錄。上海市:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王士禎、方東樹、汪中(1975)。方東樹評古詩選。台北市:聯經圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.姚鼐、方東樹、汪中(1975)。方東樹評今體詩鈔。台北市:聯經圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭福照(1978)。清方儀衛先生東樹年譜。台北市:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.丁福保(1986)。佛學大辭典。台北市:新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
13.方東樹 、上海古籍編輯部(1995)。攷盤集文錄。上海市:上海古籍。  延伸查詢new window
14.王士禎(1981)。古詩選。台北市:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.汪中(1975)。方東樹評今體詩鈔。台北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
16.汪中(1985)。方東樹評古詩選。台北市:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
17.金聖嘆、林乾(1997)。金聖嘆評點才子全集。北京市:光明日報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.金聖嘆(1989)。金聖嘆尺牘。台北市:廣文。  延伸查詢new window
19.施耐庵、金聖嘆(1970)。水滸傳。台北市:文源書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.姚範(1971)。援鶉堂筆記。臺北市:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.姚樸(1989)。文學研究法。合肥市:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
22.胡楚生(1985)。訓詁學大綱。台北市:蘭臺。  延伸查詢new window
23.張學為(1992)。中國考試制度史資料彙編。合肥市:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
24.清木正兒、陳淑女(1991)。清代文學評論史。台北市:台灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
25.許清雲(1983)。皎然詩式輯校新編。台北市:文史哲。  延伸查詢new window
26.廣文書局編輯部(1987)。明清名人尺牘。台北市:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
27.張春興(1985)。心理學。台北市:東華。  延伸查詢new window
28.彭會資(1990)。中國文論大辭典。廣西:百花文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.何文煥(1983)。歷代詩話。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
30.張高評(19950900)。宋詩之新變與代雄。臺北:洪葉文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
31.莊嚴、章鑄(1994)。中國詩歌美學史。吉林長春:吉林大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.郭紹虞(1990)。中國文學批評史。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
33.方東樹(1985)。昭昧詹言。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
34.丁福保(1988)。清詩話。台北:木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.姚鼐、劉季高(1992)。惜抱軒詩文集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top