《周易》就只能說是與《老》、《莊周四文本》同源於中文明百官史書的一種可能項而已。《周易》的教學結構化，轉向二進化的三次方與四次方或為八的二次方，與及二進位的各種組成形成之陣式與其平方。這當然是數學家的表現。 只是運用這數學結構如何解說世界中的一切可能事件，由九宮數字格的基礎到〈六十四卦〉的系統構成來完成(0到9)而到二進位組成的平方(六十四卦)以象徵世界的一切可能性；進而再加上〈六十四卦名〉與卦爻詞之說也就變得僅僅是世界敘述的一種項次而已。 如此，由[儒、道、墨、法、名、兵]來說明為中國哲學的第一代起源，則明顯不足，此應再加上數學家，如此《易》乃與七家合為八家，且同源於一共同但取材不同的商周文字，百官史書的內涵之中。各家取所欲發展之材料、內涵再加上結構化的努力，終於有了第一組先秦學的文本。

Zhou Yi, like Lao and The Four Textures Of Zhuang Zhou, can just only be said with the same source of every governmental book in the Chinese Civilization. Zhou Yi’s mathematic structure, turning into the third power and forth power of the big-endian or a quadratic equation of eight, and every type and its square of all kind of formation from the big-endian are surely regarded as the performance of mathematicians. But ho could we explain every possible event in the world only by the means of using this mathematic structure. It can be done form the formation of nine-place numbers to the systematic to the systematic composition of sixty-four divinatory symbols to accomplish “from zero to nine” to the square consist of the big-endian, the names of sixty-four divinatory symbols, in order to symbolize all possibilities in the world. Furthermore, the names of sixty-four divinatory symbols and the saying of divinatory symbols and Yao are only just one kind items in the world statements. Thus, to explain the origin of the first generation of Chinese Philosophy by the viewpoint of Conflucianism, Taoism, Mohist, Fa, Ming, Bing is obviously inadequate. Mathematicians should be added into this. Then Yi can join the title of English School with the other seven ones, and have the same source of an intension with the common but different references of Shang and Zhou’s literacy and every governmental book in the Chinese Civilization. Every school choose the stuff and intension with their own developing purpose, and make their efforts to get it be structurized. There is eventually a first set of textures of Pre-Chin Dnasty Philosophy