臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：From Military Insecurity to Human Security: An Assessment of East Asian Security Environment
書刊名：中央警察大學國境警察學報
作者：陳牧民 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Mu-min
出版日期：2004
卷期：3
頁次：頁57-82
主題關鍵詞：東亞；區域安全；現實主義；理想主義；建構主義；East Asia；Regional security；Realism；Liberalism；Constructivism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:35
本文檢視了當前東亞區域安全威脅及學者因應這些安全變化所發展出的主要理論。東亞地區目前正充斥著各種傳統與新的安全對威脅。學界對這些現象的理解主要是根據三種理論：現實主義者主張國際政治向來由強權主導，因此區域的穩定與和平只是各強權之間權力分配的結果；自由主義者強調只要國際貿易繼續發展，最後必將導致區域內各國在經濟上相互依賴與政治整合。建構主義都則認為安全與威脅等概念及影響因人因時而易。本文除分析這三大理論的優缺點外，也提出了個以人類安全為的核生概念的?架構。柴架構強調未來東亞區域安全應該建立在加強區域內主要強權間協調、多國間點作機制的建立，及公戰略文化與思想的改。
This paper examines the existed and rising threats to East Asian regional security and analyzes major theories developed by security scholars and their proposed solutions to enhancement of the regional security. East Asia today is dominated by both conventional and new threats to security, ranging from North Korea’s nuclear program to terrorist activities in ASEAN countries. The complexity of the region is further described by great cultural diversity, uneven distribution of economic wealth, and different from of political regimes. From the literature, one may find that discussions of East Asian regional security are dominated by three theoretical approaches: Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism. Each of them provides a particular view to the nature of international politics as well as a solution to security problems. The Realist approach is popular among strategic analysts and national leaders, who argue that international security is largely determined by the relations between great powers in the international system. To enhance the security of the region requires a delicate design of power relations between great powers in the region. The Liberal view are shared by many policy makers and economists, who are convinced that as long as international trade and commerce continue to grow, the entire region will become economically interdependent and politically integrated. Finally, the emerging Constructivist theorists are interested in how a particular understanding of security and threat has been constructed and accepted by the members in a given context over time. The paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of three approaches and suggests using the concept of human security to construct a synthesized framework for the studies of regional security. This framework, consisting power, institutional and ideational dimensions, proposes that with some coordination between great powers, establishment and consolidation of multilateral institutions and the change of strategic culture, the security of East Asia will be enhanced.
期刊論文
1.Buzan, Barry、Segal, Gerald(1994)。Rethinking East Asian Security。Survival，36(2)，3-21。  new window
2.Segal, Gerald(1995)。Tying china into the international system。Survival: Global Politics and Strategy，37(2)，60-73。  new window
3.Segal, Gerald(1999)。Does China Matter?。Foreign Affairs，78(5)，24-36。  new window
4.Radelet, Steven、Sachs, Jeffery(199711)。Asia's Bright Future。Foreign Affairs，76(6)，44。  new window
5.Dibb, Paul、Hale, David D.、Prince, Peter(1999)。Asian's Insecurity。Survival，41(3)，5-20。  new window
6.Kolodziej, Edward(1992)。The Renaissance of Security Studies? Caveat Lac tor!。International Studies Quarterly，36，421。  new window
7.Johnson, Chalmers(1995)。Korea and Our Asia Policy。The National Interest，74。  new window
8.Cotton, James(1995)。The North Korea/United States Nuclear Accord: Background and Consequences。Korean Observer，26(3)，321-322。  new window
9.Berstein, Richard、Munro, Ross(199703)。The Coming Conflict with America。Foreign Affairs，76(2)，18-32。  new window
10.Shambough, David(1994)。Growing Strong: China's Challenge to Asian Security。Survival，32(2)，43-59。  new window
11.Christensen, Thomas J.(1999)。China, the US-Japan Alliance, and Security Dilemma in East Asia。International Security，23(4)，49。  new window
12.Ross, Robert S.(1999)。The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the 21st Century。International Security，23(4)，96-99。  new window
13.Layne, Christopher(1997)。A House of Cards: American Strategy toward China。World Policy Journal，14(3)，77-95。  new window
14.Wade, Robert(199811)。The Asian Crisis and the Global Economy: Causes, Consequences, and Cure。Current History，1998(Nov.)，364。  new window
15.Friedberg, Aaron L.(1993)。Ripe for Rivalry: Prospect for Peace in Multipolar Asia。International Security，18(3)，22。  new window
16.Walt, Stephen M.(1991)。The Renaissance of Security Studies。International Studies Quarterly，35(2)，211-239。  new window
17.Roy, Denny(199608)。The China Threat Issue。Asian Survey，36(8)，761-765。  new window
18.Kim, Samuel S.(1999)。East Asia and Globalization: Challenges and Responses。Asian Perspectives，23(4)，5-44。  new window
19.Roy, Denny(1994)。Hegemon on the Horizon? China's Threat to East Asian Security。International Security，19(1)，149-168。  new window
20.Hopf, Ted(1998)。The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory。International Security，23(1)，171-200。  new window
21.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1993)。The Emerging Structure of International Politics。International Security，18(2)，44-79。  new window
22.Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。  new window
23.Wendt, Alexander(1995)。Constructing International Politics。International Security，20(1)，71-81。  new window
24.Baldwin, David A.(1995)。Security Studies and the End of the Cold War。World Politics，48(1)，117-141。  new window
會議論文
1.Othman, Zarina(2004)。Mission Impossible: Transnational Threats and Traditional Security。The 2nd Democratic Pacific Assembly，(會議日期: 2004/08/13-15)。Taipei。  new window
圖書
1.Alagappa, Muthiah(1998)。Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences。Stanford, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
2.Wolfers, Arnold(1962)。Discord and Collaborations: Essays on International Politics。Baltimore：Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
3.Ruggie, John G.(1998)。Constructing World Polity: Essays on international institutionalization。New York：Routledge。  new window
4.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theories of International Politics。New York：Little Brown。  new window
5.Buzan, Barry(1991)。People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era。Boulder, Colorado：Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
6.Krause, Keith、Williams, Michael C.(1997)。Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
7.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。  new window
8.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.Islamiah, Jemaah。Laskar Jihad, the Front Pembela Islam, Abu Sayyaf, the New People's Army, and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front，http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/FAD/sea.htm。  new window
2.US Department of State。2004 Traffic in Persons Report，http://www.state.gOv/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2004/。  new window
3.Fukuyama, Francis(19900115)。Are We at the End of History?。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jeperson, Ronald L.、Wendt, Alexander、Katzenstein, Peter J.(1996)。Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms, and Identity in World Politics。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：153（臺灣：148，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2344557 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68148344
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上