:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學探究能力測驗的編製與信、效度考驗
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:吳坤璋吳裕益 引用關係黃台珠
作者(外文):Wu, Kun-changWu, Yuh-yihHuang, Iris Tai-chu
出版日期:2005
卷期:52:2
頁次:頁119-148
主題關鍵詞:探究科學探究能力科學探究能力測驗驗證性因性分析InquiryScientific inquiry abilityScientific inquiry ability testConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:72
  • 點閱點閱:94
本研究主要目的在編製科學探究能力測,以評測學生的科學探究能力。本研究以高雄市國小六年級學生二七八人為研究參與對象。全測驗共分為六個分測驗,分別為觀察能力、分析能力、轉化能力、推論思考、批判思考能力和創造思考能力分測驗,其Cronbach’α信度依序是 64, .80, .65, .59, .61, .29。學生在本測驗得分和自然科學業成績的相關為.68,高能力組和一般能力學生在本測驗平均得分有顯著差異。以驗證性因素分析檢驗本測驗的因素結構,結果發理論模式和觀察資料適配度良好,其中創造思考能力分測驗的信度偏低,仍有值得改進的空間。
The purpose of this study was to develop a “Scientific Inquiry Ability Test (SIAT)” that measure students’ scientific inquiry ability. The participants included 278 sixth grade students from Kaohsiung city. Six scales were developed: observation ability, analysis ability, inferring thinking ability, critical thinking ability, and creative thinking ability. For each scale, the Cronbach’s alpha were 64, .80, .65, .59, .61, .29. There were significant correlation (p<.001) of the SIAT with students’ GPA of Nature Subject (r=.68). Average and extraordinary scientific inquiry ability group showed a significant differences (p<.001) on their SIAT scores. The examine the factor structure by utilizing confirmatory factor analysis, the scientific inquiry ability theoretical model and collected data had reached a good fit. The scale of creative thinking ability needs bo be modified further in order to improve the reliability.
Other
1.Amabile, Teresa M.(1982)。The Social Psychology of Creativity,Springer-Verlag。  new window
期刊論文
1.Cuevas, P.、Lee, O.、Hart, J.、Deaktor, R.(2005)。Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(3),337-357。  new window
2.盧秀琴(20040900)。中小學「細胞相關課程閱讀理解能力測驗」的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類,17(2),83-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.邱美虹(20000300)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Gagne, R.(1963)。The Learning Requirements for Enquiry。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1,144-153。  new window
5.許榮富(1992)。形成假說技能之評量模式及其測量本質的分析研究。師大學報,37,395-457。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kim, Minchi、Hannafin, Michael(2004)。Designing Online Learning Environment to Support Scientific Inquiry。The Quarterly Review of Distance Education,5(1),1-10。  new window
7.Lederman, Norman G.、Schwartz, Renee S.、Crawford, Barbara A.(2004)。Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap between Nature of Science and Inquiry。Science Teacher Education,88(4),610-645。  new window
8.So, Wing-Mui Winnie(2003)。Learning Science through Investigations: An Experience with Hong Kong Primary School Children。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,1(2),175-200。  new window
會議論文
1.吳坤璋、洪振方(2004)。以科學探究歷程激發學生創意表現之研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳瓊森(1984)。國民中學學生科學方法過程之研究,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cropley, A. J.(2001)。Creativity in Education and Learning。Creativity in Education and Learning。London, UK:Kogan Page。  new window
2.Bruner, Jerome S.(1969)。The Process of Education。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Ruggiero, Vincent R.(1988)。Teaching Thinking Across the Curriculum。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
4.De Bono, E.(1992)。Teach your child how to think。London:Viking。  new window
5.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。臺北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lipman, Matthew(2003)。Thinking in education。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Devine, T. G.(1981)。Teaching Study Skills。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
8.郭生玉(1997)。心理與教育測驗。精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hergenhahn, B. R.、王文科(1989)。學習心理學。臺北市:五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳正昌、程炳林(1994)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.林清山(1999)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.魏明通(1997)。科學教育。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.Beyer, Barry K.(1988)。Developing A Thinking Skills Program。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
15.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
17.DeVellis, Robert F.(1991)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。Sage。  new window
18.余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
19.Barton, Roy(1998)。It Is Practical Work。Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now?。New York, NY。  new window
20.De Bóo, Max(1999)。Enquiring Children, Challenging Teaching。Buckingham, Philadelphia:Open University Press。  new window
21.Fleer, Marilyn、Hardy, Tim(1996)。Science for Children: Developing a Personal Approach to Teaching。Sydney, Australia:Prentice Hall。  new window
22.Fiel, R. L.、Funk, H. James、Okey, J. R.、Jaus, H. H.、Sprague, C. S.(1985)。Learning Science Process Skills。Dubuque, IA:Hunt Publishing Company。  new window
23.Hogan, Kathleen、Fisherkeller, Joellen E.(2000)。Dialogue as Data: Assessing Students' Scientific Reasoning with Interactive Protocols。Assessing Science Understanding。California。  new window
24.Higgott, Richard、Lubben, Fred、Millar, Robin、Duggan, Sandra(1996)。Children's Performance of Investigative Tasks in Science: A Framework for Considering Progression。Progression in Learning。Clevedon, UK。  new window
25.Tamir, P.、Shulman, L. S.(1973)。Research on Teaching in the Natural Science。Second Handbook of Research on Teaching。Chicago, IL。  new window
26.Linfield, Rachel Sparks、Warwick, Paul(2000)。Developing a Scientific Way of Working with Young Children。Science 3-13: The Past, the Present, and Possible Futures。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.吳靜吉(2003)。創造力的評量--4P觀點,澎湖市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ennis, R. H.(1985)。Goals for a Critical Thinking Curriculum。Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE