:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:殯儀服務流程之犯罪型態研究--以臺北縣市為例
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:張祥儀
作者(外文):Jhang, Siang-yi
出版日期:2005
卷期:5
頁次:頁37-89
主題關鍵詞:殯葬服務犯罪賄賂詐欺Funeral serviceCrimeBriberyFraud
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1323
  • 點閱點閱:48
殯儀服務流程犯罪時有所聞,但國內目前針對此一領域加以著墨者不多。在國人習慣避談死亡的文化背景之下,長久以來殯葬相關行業一直蒙著一層神秘的面紗,大眾對於殯葬業所知有限,加上政府在立法與執法上長期的漠視,更增加了殯儀服務流程中違法的可趁之機。本研究主要目的是瞭解殯儀服務流程不法行為的社會文化建構,掌握、理解並發掘影響殯儀服務流程犯罪行為發生的因子。本研究先對一般大眾進行深訪談,以瞭解民眾與殯葬業者的互動模式與問題所在,並從中發掘具理論意義之議是。接著再以滾雪球方式尋找殯葬業者、政府相關領域主管單位受訪者進行深度訪談。對三類型受訪者的訪談結果進行交叉分析,建立對殯儀服務流程犯罪較全面性的知識。 研究發現三類主要犯罪行為:違法開立死亡證明、公務員賄賂、二手花詐期問題。(1)因為醫院逃避開死亡證明的責任、民眾對於死亡證明認識不足以及殯葬禮儀服務業者圖方便心態、監督執法單位無力查禁,而容易發生違法開立死亡證明行為:(2)因為民眾能容忍送紅包行為、業者間送紅包積習成陋規、執=法機關有努力但防不勝防,所以容易發生公務員行賄、受賄行為;(3)最後,因殯葬儀式過程緊湊、民眾無力自我保護、業者間默契存在,姑息犯罪、執法機關的漠視,所以容易發生二手花詐斯犯罪。 研究建議:(1)強化殯葬領域消費者之消費意識;(2)推動殯葬領域教育管道與證照制度;(3)強化衛生所死亡證明服務之功能,並監督醫院開死亡證明工作,禁止醫院逃避責任;(4)殯葬領域的任何支出都必須開立收據,減少紅包問題;(5)以公辦民營方式掌握殯儀館實質人事權以減少紅包問題;(6)推廣出租花以及新舊花差別價格制度,以減少二手花詐欺問題。
The previous literature has no or very little knowledge on the funeral business and its criminal behavior in Taiwan. Superstition and the negative image of death and funeral process make it difficult to study this topic. The closure networking in the funeral business is also a boundary for outsiders to understand them. The negligence of government further creates more opportunities for business to commit crime. The thesis was designed to explore the risk factors of the criminal behavior in funeral processes. First, the author interviewed customers who have personally processed their family members’ funerals in the past one year to discover their experiences and interactions with the funeral companies. In addition, a few selected funeral workers and governmental officials were interviewed. Gathering and cross-examining three different kinds to information, the thesis analyzed how and why a funeral has the risk factors to make the crime possible. The results indicated that there were three main criminal behaviors most likely to happen in funeral process: medical doctors forgerying death certificates, public servants taking bribes, and funeral companies cheating and over-pricing the consumers by providing them second-hand flowers instead of fresh flowers. Four risk factors made forgery death certificates possible:(1) hospitals wanted to avoid the workloads and possible legal responsibility of giving death certificate; (2) most people didn’t know how to apply for the death certificate; (3) funeral companies recommendation for convenience; and (4) the responsible department of the government failed to safeguard it . as to the risk factors of bribery, most people in Taiwan tacitly agreed the bribing behavior because of the superstition and informal cultural norms that a bribe in red bags or “Hong-Bou” could avoid bad lucks from touching or seeing the body. The thesis also found that the flower fraud problem was because the carelessness of customers and the illegal subculture among funeral companies. Several suggestions were recommended to prevent the risk factors: (1) funeral companies should inform consumers about their rights before signing a contract; (2) government should impose license systems for funeral workers; (3) the public health offices should improve their service issuing death certificates; (4) consumers should request the service detail lists and receipts from the funeral companies; (5) government could consider translating some funeral service and translate it into BOT(Build-Operate-Transfer) model; and; (6) government should encourage funeral companies to print a referential price list for fresh flowers, second-hand flowers and rental flowers for consumers to choose.
Other
1.中華民國史蹟研究中心(1983)。臺灣地區現行喪葬禮俗研究報告。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.侯崇文(2003)。理性選擇與犯罪決定--以少年竊盜為例。犯罪與刑事司法研究,1,1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cohen, L. E.、Felson, M.(1979)。Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach。American Sociological Review,44(4),588-608。  new window
3.侯崇文(20001200)。青少年偏差行為--社會控制理論與社會學習理論的整合。犯罪學期刊,6,35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.徐福全(20011200)。臺灣殯葬禮俗的過去、現在與未來。社區發展季刊,96,99-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.瞿海源(2001)。台灣新興宗教信徒之態度與行為特徵。社會與宗教變遷研討會。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。1-28。  延伸查詢new window
2.瞿海源(1997)。術數流行與社會變遷。宗教、靈異、科學與社會研討會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。1-36。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄧曉剛、周愫嫻(2000)。恥感與道德感對偏差行為的影響--一個跨文化研究。2000年犯罪問題理論與實務研討會。臺北:國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Felson, M.(1998)。Crime and everyday life。Thousand Oaks, CA:Pine Forge Press。  new window
2.Neuman, W. L.(1997)。Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approches。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.林山田(1999)。刑法各罪論。臺大法學院圖書部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Vito, Gennaro F.、Holmes, Ronald M.(1994)。Criminology: Theory, Research, and Policy。California:Wadsworth, Inc.。  new window
5.林山田(2001)。刑法通論。  延伸查詢new window
6.Sutherland, Edwin H.(1949)。White Collar Crime。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
7.許春金(2003)。犯罪學。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.孟維德(2001)。白領犯罪:現象、理論與對策。亞太圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃有志(200202)。殯葬改革概論。黃有志。  延伸查詢new window
10.許春金(2000)。犯罪學。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳向明(2008)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭志明(20000000)。以人體為媒介的道教。嘉義:南華大學宗教文化研究中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
14.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet、徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.丁庭宇、馬康莊(1986)。現代化對民間宗教信仰與行為的影響。  延伸查詢new window
2.王順民(2001)。殯葬生死服務的另類思考--宗教的、人文的與市場的綜融考察。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.立法院(2002)。91/42-3238號(上)。  延伸查詢new window
4.阮俊中(2003)。臺灣殯葬產業動態研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.周愫嫻(2001)。白領犯罪的界定與爭議。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.周愫嫻、張祥儀(2003)。台灣殯葬業犯罪問題初探。  延伸查詢new window
7.曹光文(2004)。羞恥作用對於犯罪行為控制產生效應之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃有志、鄧文龍合著(2002)。環保自然葬概論--讓逝者得其所,讓生者了無憾。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃維憲、羅珮瑜(2001)。台灣殯葬服務現代化的文獻回顧。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉文仕(2001)。打造優質的天堂之路。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.瞿海源(2002)。宗教。  延伸查詢new window
12.Braithwaite, J(1989)。Crime, Shame and Reintegration。  new window
13.Felson, M.(2001)。The routine activity approach: a very versatile theory of crime。  new window
14.Felson, M.(2003)。Crime and Everyday Life。  new window
15.Grasmick, Harold Ci and Bursik Jr. Robert(1990)。Conscience, significant others and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE