資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.59.55.193)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
扒竊被害者報案決意歷程與被害反應之研究
書刊名:
犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:
邱淑蘋
/
許春金
作者(外文):
Chiu, Shu-pin
/
Sheu, Chuen-jim
出版日期:
2005
卷期:
5
頁次:
頁91-141
主題關鍵詞:
扒竊
;
報案
;
報警
;
功利觀點
;
正義秩序
;
被害反應
;
Pickpocket
;
Crime report
;
Call police
;
Crime victim response
;
Crime notification
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
6
點閱:38
犯罪被害調查的結果發現:扒竊案件是報案率最低的犯罪類型。找出形成犯罪黑數的原因與影響因素,除了增加社會大眾正確認識扒竊犯罪的本質,亦有助於增加民眾扒竊報案行為的意識,使國家追訴扒竊犯罪的機制得以順利發動,並能提供警察機關作為改善對被害者服務品質的參考。 本研究選取四名報案之扒竊犯罪被害者及四名未報案之扒竊被害者為研究對象,以深度訪談的方式,探討扒竊被害者報案決意歷程中,所涉及的感受,想法、社會互動、考慮因素等等,歸納出扒竊被害者報案/不報案的原因,以及扒竊被害後的反應與期待。 研究發現,就扒竊事件的特性而言,如果被害者難以證實遭到扒竊,通常不會考慮報案請求警察偵辦。因為扒竊並不涉及人身安全的威脅,除了財物損失的主觀感受外,是否報案並不因性別、年齡、家庭結構等等個人特質,而有顯著差異。扒竊被害者報案的動機,主要是基於功利的觀點,而非出於正義訴求。除非損失財物非常巨大,報案的主要理由並非想找回被扒的財物,而是想備案以免衍生不可預測的危險的爭議;不報案的主要原因,除了財物損失輕微之外,主要在於對警察維護社會治安能力沒有期待,至於警察的形象與態度,並非是重要的影響因素。即使對於社會秩序與公平正義期待較高者,也會因為損失輕微、自我歸因,而傾向不報案。
以文找文
Empirical studies have shown that many victims of pickpocket did not report their victimizations to the police. These dark figures of crime have distorted official crime statistics and influenced greatly prevention policy. The goal of the study is to present data from an empirical study regarding victim’s decision to notify the police. The research is useful to explore the public policy implications, especially policies that might improve victim’s well being, and their willingness to cooperate with the criminal justice systems. Data were collected from 8 victims by face-to-face in-depth interviews, 4 had sought assistance from police and 4 had not. It attempts to discover the recognition, cognitive, coping, and social interaction in the decision process of reporting behavior. According to this present research, many victims may not label the event a crime, naturally they would not want to notification. Though the effects of the pickpocketing do not involve the sense of security, but cause the victims to lose financial properties and valuable goods. Therefore, the victims who suffered from greater losses are more likely to report to the police. The main reason to call police is not to hope to recover the losses, but to have a record in the police to mark that their certificates have been stolen. If anything happened, they don’ts have to be responsible for it. Meanwhile, many victims do not have faiths in police ability to maintain social order. They are not looking forward to the policeman to be aware of the public security and expect the police to make more patrols. Utilitarianism and economic perspectives are the key points to explain victims reporting behavior.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Finkelhor, David、Wolak, Janis、Berliner, Lucy(2001)。Police reporting and professional help seeking for child crime victims: a review。Child Maltreatment,6(1),17-30。
2.
Frieze, I. H.、Greenberg, M. S.、Hymer, S.(1987)。Describing the victims of crime: psychological reactions to victimization。Professional psychology: research and practice,18,299-315。
3.
Starett, Richard A.(1988)。The crime reporting behavior of Hispanic older Persons: a causal model。Journal of criminal Justice,16(5),413-423。
4.
邱淑蘋、莊忠進(20041200)。住宅竊盜被害者報案行為之研究。警專學報,3(5),211-237。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
許春金、莫季雍、陳玉書、孟維德、蔡田木、馬傳鎮(2000)。臺灣地區犯罪被害經驗調查研究。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
Haghighi, B.(1985)。The patterns of property crime victimization and notification: a multivariate approach(博士論文)。Sam Houston State University。
圖書
1.
Greenberg, Martin S.、Ruback, R. Barry(1992)。After the crime: victim decision making。New York:Plenum Press。
其他
1.
陳敦源(2000)。人民為何投票?--理性選擇理論觀點的緣起與發展。
延伸查詢
2.
錢永祥(1991)。人格、財產與正義。
延伸查詢
3.
Bennet Richard R. and Wiegand R. Bruce(1994)。Observations on crime repoting in a developing nation。
4.
Benekos, Peter J.(1998)。Community integration and response to victimization。
5.
Biblarz, Arturo, J., et at.(1984)。To tell or not to tell: difference between victims who report crimes and victims who do not。
6.
Bogarrd, Joop van den and Oene Wiegman(1991)。Property crime victimization: the effectiveness of police services for vitims odf residential burglary。
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics(2002)。Criminal vitimization 2001: changes 2000-2001 with trends 1993-2001。
8.
Fishman, Gideon(1979)。Patterns of victimization and notification。
9.
Howlad, Mele Jeanne(1995)。Examining the decision to seek professional, psychological help: a comparison of attribution and attitude theory in predicting help seeking intention using the theory of reasoned action。
10.
Kaukinen, Catherine Elizabeth(2002)。The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims: an examination of the direct and conditional effects of gender and the victim-offender, relationship。
11.
Kearon, Tony and Rebecca Leach(1999)。Invasion of the body snatchers: burglary reconsidered。
12.
Kidd, Robert F. and Ellen F. Chayet(1984)。Why so victims fail to report? The psychology of criminal victimization。
13.
Marenin, Otwin(1996)。Victimization surveys and the accuracy and reliability of official crime data in developing countries。
14.
Markesteyn, Trevor John(1993)。Towards a working model of criminal victimization: the psychological impact of residential break and enter。
15.
Myers, Samuel L(1980)。Why are crime underreported? What is the crime rate? Does it really matter?。
16.
Moser, Gabriel(1997)。Attributions causale et evalution dh sentiment dinsecurite de victims de differents types de vols。
17.
Shah, R. and K. Pease(1992)。Crime, race and reporting the police。
18.
Ullman, Sarah E. and Henrietta H. Filipas(2000)。Correlates of formal and informal support seeking in sexual assault victims。
19.
Veneziano Louis and Carol Veneziano(2001)。Should there be a duty to report crime?。
20.
Yee, Jennifer L., Martins S. Greenberg, and Scott R. Beach(1998)。Attitudes toward various modes of coping with criminal victimization: the effects of gender and type of crime。
21.
Yee, Jennifer L. and Martins S. Greenberg(1999)。Reactions to crime victims: effects of victims’ emotional state and type of relationship。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
應用多變量迴歸樹探勘民眾110報案量之結構與趨勢--以嘉義市政府警察局第二分局為例
2.
影響財產犯罪被害者報案行為相關因素之研究
3.
東南亞外籍配偶報案意願之研究
4.
住宅竊盜被害者報案決定因素與被害反應之研究
5.
財產犯罪被害者報案動機之研究
6.
搶奪犯罪被害者報案決意與反應之研究
7.
住宅竊盜被害者報案行為之研究
8.
犯罪被害者報案之決意歷程
1.
財產犯罪被害者報案行為之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code