:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:扒竊被害者報案決意歷程與被害反應之研究
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:邱淑蘋許春金 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Shu-pinSheu, Chuen-jim
出版日期:2005
卷期:5
頁次:頁91-141
主題關鍵詞:扒竊報案報警功利觀點正義秩序被害反應PickpocketCrime reportCall policeCrime victim responseCrime notification
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:38
犯罪被害調查的結果發現:扒竊案件是報案率最低的犯罪類型。找出形成犯罪黑數的原因與影響因素,除了增加社會大眾正確認識扒竊犯罪的本質,亦有助於增加民眾扒竊報案行為的意識,使國家追訴扒竊犯罪的機制得以順利發動,並能提供警察機關作為改善對被害者服務品質的參考。 本研究選取四名報案之扒竊犯罪被害者及四名未報案之扒竊被害者為研究對象,以深度訪談的方式,探討扒竊被害者報案決意歷程中,所涉及的感受,想法、社會互動、考慮因素等等,歸納出扒竊被害者報案/不報案的原因,以及扒竊被害後的反應與期待。 研究發現,就扒竊事件的特性而言,如果被害者難以證實遭到扒竊,通常不會考慮報案請求警察偵辦。因為扒竊並不涉及人身安全的威脅,除了財物損失的主觀感受外,是否報案並不因性別、年齡、家庭結構等等個人特質,而有顯著差異。扒竊被害者報案的動機,主要是基於功利的觀點,而非出於正義訴求。除非損失財物非常巨大,報案的主要理由並非想找回被扒的財物,而是想備案以免衍生不可預測的危險的爭議;不報案的主要原因,除了財物損失輕微之外,主要在於對警察維護社會治安能力沒有期待,至於警察的形象與態度,並非是重要的影響因素。即使對於社會秩序與公平正義期待較高者,也會因為損失輕微、自我歸因,而傾向不報案。
Empirical studies have shown that many victims of pickpocket did not report their victimizations to the police. These dark figures of crime have distorted official crime statistics and influenced greatly prevention policy. The goal of the study is to present data from an empirical study regarding victim’s decision to notify the police. The research is useful to explore the public policy implications, especially policies that might improve victim’s well being, and their willingness to cooperate with the criminal justice systems. Data were collected from 8 victims by face-to-face in-depth interviews, 4 had sought assistance from police and 4 had not. It attempts to discover the recognition, cognitive, coping, and social interaction in the decision process of reporting behavior. According to this present research, many victims may not label the event a crime, naturally they would not want to notification. Though the effects of the pickpocketing do not involve the sense of security, but cause the victims to lose financial properties and valuable goods. Therefore, the victims who suffered from greater losses are more likely to report to the police. The main reason to call police is not to hope to recover the losses, but to have a record in the police to mark that their certificates have been stolen. If anything happened, they don’ts have to be responsible for it. Meanwhile, many victims do not have faiths in police ability to maintain social order. They are not looking forward to the policeman to be aware of the public security and expect the police to make more patrols. Utilitarianism and economic perspectives are the key points to explain victims reporting behavior.
期刊論文
1.Finkelhor, David、Wolak, Janis、Berliner, Lucy(2001)。Police reporting and professional help seeking for child crime victims: a review。Child Maltreatment,6(1),17-30。  new window
2.Frieze, I. H.、Greenberg, M. S.、Hymer, S.(1987)。Describing the victims of crime: psychological reactions to victimization。Professional psychology: research and practice,18,299-315。  new window
3.Starett, Richard A.(1988)。The crime reporting behavior of Hispanic older Persons: a causal model。Journal of criminal Justice,16(5),413-423。  new window
4.邱淑蘋、莊忠進(20041200)。住宅竊盜被害者報案行為之研究。警專學報,3(5),211-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許春金、莫季雍、陳玉書、孟維德、蔡田木、馬傳鎮(2000)。臺灣地區犯罪被害經驗調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Haghighi, B.(1985)。The patterns of property crime victimization and notification: a multivariate approach(博士論文)。Sam Houston State University。  new window
圖書
1.Greenberg, Martin S.、Ruback, R. Barry(1992)。After the crime: victim decision making。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
其他
1.陳敦源(2000)。人民為何投票?--理性選擇理論觀點的緣起與發展。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢永祥(1991)。人格、財產與正義。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bennet Richard R. and Wiegand R. Bruce(1994)。Observations on crime repoting in a developing nation。  new window
4.Benekos, Peter J.(1998)。Community integration and response to victimization。  new window
5.Biblarz, Arturo, J., et at.(1984)。To tell or not to tell: difference between victims who report crimes and victims who do not。  new window
6.Bogarrd, Joop van den and Oene Wiegman(1991)。Property crime victimization: the effectiveness of police services for vitims odf residential burglary。  new window
7.Bureau of Justice Statistics(2002)。Criminal vitimization 2001: changes 2000-2001 with trends 1993-2001。  new window
8.Fishman, Gideon(1979)。Patterns of victimization and notification。  new window
9.Howlad, Mele Jeanne(1995)。Examining the decision to seek professional, psychological help: a comparison of attribution and attitude theory in predicting help seeking intention using the theory of reasoned action。  new window
10.Kaukinen, Catherine Elizabeth(2002)。The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims: an examination of the direct and conditional effects of gender and the victim-offender, relationship。  new window
11.Kearon, Tony and Rebecca Leach(1999)。Invasion of the body snatchers: burglary reconsidered。  new window
12.Kidd, Robert F. and Ellen F. Chayet(1984)。Why so victims fail to report? The psychology of criminal victimization。  new window
13.Marenin, Otwin(1996)。Victimization surveys and the accuracy and reliability of official crime data in developing countries。  new window
14.Markesteyn, Trevor John(1993)。Towards a working model of criminal victimization: the psychological impact of residential break and enter。  new window
15.Myers, Samuel L(1980)。Why are crime underreported? What is the crime rate? Does it really matter?。  new window
16.Moser, Gabriel(1997)。Attributions causale et evalution dh sentiment dinsecurite de victims de differents types de vols。  new window
17.Shah, R. and K. Pease(1992)。Crime, race and reporting the police。  new window
18.Ullman, Sarah E. and Henrietta H. Filipas(2000)。Correlates of formal and informal support seeking in sexual assault victims。  new window
19.Veneziano Louis and Carol Veneziano(2001)。Should there be a duty to report crime?。  new window
20.Yee, Jennifer L., Martins S. Greenberg, and Scott R. Beach(1998)。Attitudes toward various modes of coping with criminal victimization: the effects of gender and type of crime。  new window
21.Yee, Jennifer L. and Martins S. Greenberg(1999)。Reactions to crime victims: effects of victims’ emotional state and type of relationship。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top