:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同類別的醒吾商專學生在體育課選項教學滿意度上之比較研究
書刊名:醒吾學報
作者:蔡欣延
作者(外文):Tsai, Hsin-yen
出版日期:2001
卷期:24
頁次:頁207-236
主題關鍵詞:體育課分組教學滿意度滿意度指標Elective physical education coursesSatisfactory levelThe index of satisfactory level
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:33
本研究以醒吾商專1743位學生(男生391人,女生1352)為對象,以自行設計的滿意度量表,調查學生體育課興趣選項教學量的滿意度。滿意度量表包括五個分量表:分別為體育教育行政、體育教師專業、同儕關係、體育教育效果及場地器材設備。並以滿意度為指標,來計算八十六學年度醒吾商專體育課選項作業學生的滿意度。結果顯示:(1)在滿意度方面,以體育教師專業因素為最滿意,其次分別為:同儕關係、體育教學結果、場地器材設備及體育教學行政等因素。(2)醒吾商專八十六學年度選項作業學生的滿意度指標得分為25.45±5.96分,滿意度百分比為89.09%,顯示學生有很高的滿意度。(3)不同性別、組別、上課時段、運動參與和體育成績的醒吾商專學生,在滿意度因素上有顯著的差異。
The subjects of study were 1743 students (males, N=391; Females, N=1352) of Hsing-Wu college, used the self-designed inventories to investigate students’ satisfactory level of elective physical education courses. The inventory of satisfactory level included five subscales: there were teaching administration of physical education、the specialty of physical education teachers、peer relationship、teaching effects of physical education and facility and equipment. And used the index of satisfactory degree to compute students’ satisfactory level for the work of elective physical education courses to Hisng-Wu college of commerce in 1997. Findings indicates: (1) The specialty of physical education teachers was the most satisfactory factor, the following were individually peer relationship、teaching effects of physical education、facility and equipment and teaching administration of physical education. (2) The index of satisfactory level marks was 25.45±5.96, and the percent of satisfactory level was 89.09%. (3) Students of different sexes、sport groups、the period of class、participation frequency of sport and PE marks had significant difference in the satisfactory level.
期刊論文
1.Sarkin, J. A.(1997)。Gender Differences in Physical Activity during Fifth-Grade Physical Education and Recess Periods。Journal of teaching in physical education,17(1),99-106。  new window
2.陳文長(19950400)。大學生對興趣分組體育課滿意度量表之信度與效度分析。國立體育學院論叢,5(1),51-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.徐仁廣、王順正(19940600)。國立臺北師範學院體育課興趣選項滿意度的探討。臺北師院學報,7,1003-1026。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊建民、姜明英、陳俊男(19910600)。體育選課資訊系統模式之研究。國民體育季刊,20(2)=89,4-17。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡欣延(20000800)。不同類別的醒吾商專學生在體育課選項動機上之比較研究。醒吾學報,23,502-469。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.唐麗英、胡安華(19960600)。滿意度模式建立與滿意構面確認之研究。交大管理學報,16(1),55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.楊志顯、吳惠櫻、陳瓊茶、翁樹平(19970100)。體育課實施方式與學生滿意度之研究。體育學報,22,153-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡欣延(19980700)。醒吾商專體育課興趣選項分組教學學生滿意度量表編製之研究。體育學報,25,51-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭金昌(19970200)。東海大學學生對體育課興趣分組教學滿意度與修課態度調查研究。大專體育,29,22-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.楊志顯(19960600)。輔仁大學體育課程滿意量表研製。大專體育,26,25-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳文長(1995)。大學生運動性休閒參與動機與興趣分組體育課滿意度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李金泉(1996)。如何精通SPSS for windows統計分析(基礎操作篇)。台北:松崗電腦。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE