資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.144.97.104)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Can Intellectual Capital Powerfully Explain the Stock Price of Electronic Companies?
書刊名:
臺灣管理學刊
作者:
蔡學章
/
滑明曙
作者(外文):
Tsai, Hsueh-chang
/
Hua, Ming-shu
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
6:2
頁次:
頁237-249
主題關鍵詞:
智慧資本
;
加權平均資金成本
;
權益資金成本率
;
超額盈餘折現值法
;
評價
;
Intellectual capital
;
Weighted average cost of capital
;
Cost of equity capital
;
Discounted residual income method
;
Valuation
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:40
因受限於一般公認會計原理原則(GAPP)的規範,企業自行發展出來的無形資產及其所具有的價值並不能入帳,使得傳統資產負債表上的帳面淨值已經無法正確表達知識型企業的價值,所以本研究使用超額報酬折現值法衡量臺灣電子科技業上市公司之智慧資本,再以衡量所得之智慧資本取代會計盈餘,建構一含有智慧資本之股票評價模式,再以檢驗臺灣電子科技企業之智慧資本與股票價格是否存有顯著的關聯程度,並證明智慧資本是否比會計盈餘更能解釋電子科技企業的股票價格。 迴歸分析的結果證明,臺灣電子科技業上市公司之智慧資本與其股票價格間存有顯著的正向關聯程度,且智慧資本與帳面淨值對股票價格的聯合解釋能力確實高於會計盈餘與帳面淨值。我們也發現,在超額盈餘折現值模式中,以加權平剛資金成本(WACC)取代權益資金成本率(Re)作為折現率,用以衡量智慧資本,能提高智慧資本與股票價格之間的正向關聯程度;而使用加權平均權益報酬率取代簡單平均權益報酬率,用以衡量智慧資本,亦能提升智慧資本對股票價值的關聯性。此外,實證結果亦顯示,並非所有電子科技企業都擁有正值的智慧資本。
以文找文
This study takes the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to replace the traditionally used cost of equity capital (Re) in the discounted residual income method to rationally measure firm's intellectual capital (IC), and then construct a valuation model with IC to examine the value relevance of IC and stock price of electronic company. Using a sample of 173 electronic companies listed before end of 2001 in Taiwan, the empirical results reveal that the relationship of IC and stock price is positive, and the joint explanatory power of IC and book value for stock price is superior to that of earnings and book value. Moreover, we find that taking WACC to replace Re as the discounted rate to measure IC will increase the degree of positive relationship between IC and stock price, and using the weighted average return of equity to replace the simple average return of equity to measure IC may increase the value relevance of IC. The empirical results also demonstrate that not every company has positive value of IC even it is a high-tech one.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Cañibano, L.、García-Ayuso, M.、Sánchez, M. P.(2000)。Accounting for intangibles: a literature review。Journal of Accounting Literature,19(1),102-130。
2.
Collins, D. W.、Maydew, E. L.、Weiss, I.(1997)。Changes in the Value-relevance of Earnings and Book Value over the past Forty Years。Journal of Accounting and Economics,24(1),39-67。
3.
Feltham, Gerald A.、Ohlson, James A.(1995)。Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities。Contemporary Accounting Research,11(2),689-731。
4.
Brown, Stephen、Lo, Kin、Lys, Thomas(1999)。Use of R2 in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance over the Last Four Decades。Journal of Accounting & Economics,28(2),83-115。
5.
Peppard, J.、Rylander, A.(2001)。Leveraging Intellectual Capital at APiON。Journal of Intellectual Capital,2(3),225-235。
6.
Barth, Mary E.、Beaver, William H.、Landsman, Wayne R.(1998)。Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health。Journal of Accounting and Economics,25(1),1-34。
7.
Ohlson, James A.(1995)。Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation。Contemporary Accounting Research,11(2),661-687。
8.
Frankel, Richard M.、Lee, Charles M. C.(1998)。Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns。Journal of Accounting and Economics,25(3),283-319。
9.
Lev, Baruch、Zarowin, Paul(1999)。The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them。Journal of Accounting Research,37(2),353-385。
10.
Bell, C.R.(1997)。“IC,”。Executive Excellence,14(1),15。
11.
Booth, R.(1998)。The measurement of IC。Management Accounting,76(10),26-28。
12.
Dzinkowski, R.(2000)。“The measurement and management of IC: an Introduction,”。International Management Accounting Study (February),78(2),32-36。
13.
Masoulas Vasilis(1998)。Organizational requirements definition for IC management。International Journal of Technology Management,vol.16,no.1/2/3,126-143。
會議論文
1.
Goldfinger, C.(1997)。Understanding and measuring the intangible economy: Current status and suggestions for future research。CIRET seminar。Helsinki。
圖書
1.
Stewart, T. A.(1997)。Intellevtual capital: the new wealth of organizations。New York, NY:The Doubleday Broadway Publishing Group, Inc.。
2.
Penman, Stephen. H.(2001)。Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill Irwin。
3.
Edvinsson, Leif、Malone, Michael S.(1997)。Intellectual capital: realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower。New York, NY:HarperCollins Publishers Inc.。
4.
Lev, B., B. Sarath, and T. Sougiannis(1999)。“R&D-related reporting biases and their consequences,”。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
如何透過知識創造與知識分享提升銀行業人力資本?--SEM分析法
2.
An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Intellectual Capitals and Performance in a Taiwan Hospital
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code