本研究以輔仁大學羽球興趣選項三個授課班之女學生120人為研究對象第一部份60人，在均質考慮下，以初試成績分派至密集練習，絕對分散練習與相對分散練習等三組，每組平均20人。第二部份為不同目標區之分組，同樣以60人，隨機分派至大、中、小尺寸目標及控制組等四個分組，每組15人來探討： （一）在不同練習方式（密集練習、相對分散練習、絕對分散練習）對羽球短發球教學成績之影響，並比較其效果。 （二）在不同尺寸目標區練習，對於羽球短發球成績之影響，並比較其效果。 經實地實驗後將可獲得的結果運用獨立樣本單因子變異數分析得到下結果： （一）在不同練習分組中，試做成績達極顯著的差異水準（P＜.01）。此項差異乃由於密集練習組與絕對分散練習組之間的差異，及相對分散練習組與絕對分散練習組，兩個顯著差異間所形成。 （二）在不同尺寸目標區分組中，試做成績未達顯著差異水準（P＞.05）。 （三）不同練習分組或不同尺寸目標區分組，在練習停止後一週及一個月之保留測驗，均無顯著的差異顯示（P＞.05）。

The purpose of this study was to compare the instructional effect to short serve with different training ways (intensive training, relative distributed training, and absolute distributed training) and different size goal areas in badminton. The total of 120 women was divided to two parts. 60 women were divided to the first part and given three training ways of intensive training, relative distributed training, and absolute distributed training. The others were divided to the second part randomly and given four size goal areas of big, medium, small size goal area, and control group. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and found: 1. The trial score had marked difference in different training ways (p<.01). 2. Thr trial score had marked difference in different size goal areas (p>.05). 3. After stopping training in a weed and a month, the retention test had non-marked difference in difference in different training ways and different size goal areas (p>.05).