:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:香港公營部門「資源增值計畫」的實踐:對新公共管理改革的批判性分析
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:蘇偉業 引用關係
作者(外文):So, Bennis Wai-yip
出版日期:2005
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁83-117
主題關鍵詞:資源增值新公共管理機構重塑策略機構精簡香港政府Enhanced productivityNew public managementBureau-shaping strategyDownsizingHong Kong government
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:30
本文回顧及評估香港特區政府從1998至2003年推行的公營部門「資源增值計劃」的政策執行。這是自1990年代香港引入英美新公共管理改革的重要縮影。筆者試圖以批判性方式解構「資源增值計劃」的意涵,指出改革的實質目標在數年間於執行上不斷被重塑,總體上公營部門資源是否有所增值是一個疑問。更明顯地,「資源增值計劃」變成以犧牲中下層公務員利益及增強管理層的駕禦能力作為實質目標。應然性的「個人資源增值」仍然是一個遙遠的烏托邦。
This article is to review and evaluate the "enhanced productivity programme" that was implemented in the Hong Kong Special Administration Region Government from 1998 to 2003. This is all epitome of application of the Anglo-American New Public Management reform to Hong Kong. The author attempts to critically probe the implications of the programme, indicating that the policy goals of the programme have been being shaped ever since the beginning. It is problematic as to whether the programme has resulted in the productivity enhancement in general. However, obviously, the substantive goals of the programme entail sacrificing the middle-to-lox-level civil servants' interest and enhancing the tractability of the management. The normative aim for "individual value addition" still stands far away from the current reforms.
期刊論文
1.Van Slyke, David M.(2003)。The Mythology of Privatization in Contracting for Social Services。Public Administration Review,63(3),296-316。  new window
2.Wise, Lois Recascino(2002)。Public Management Reform: Competing Drivers of Change。Public Administration Review,62(5),555-567。  new window
3.施能傑(20010500)。彈性化職位設計與政府人力運用。人事月刊,32(5)=189,33-45。  延伸查詢new window
4.施能傑(19990400)。人力運用的兩項趨勢--精簡與彈性化。人事月刊,28(4)=164,45-53。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳學良(2000)。我國公共部門精簡之作法-從世界潮流談起。財稅研究(財稅研究雜誌社),32(3),64-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.盧建旭(1998)。政府再造中公務人力資源規劃管理的檢討。研考雙月刊,22(4),37-52。  延伸查詢new window
7.Brown, Trevor L.、Potoski, Matthew(2003)。Contract-management Capacity in Municipal and Country Governments。Public Administration Review,63(2),153-164。  new window
8.張炳良(1996)。Efficiency as the Rhetoric: Public-sector Reform in Hong Kong Explained。International Review of Administrative Sciences,62(1),31-47。  new window
9.張炳良(1997)。Understanding Public-sector Reforms: Global Trends and Diverse Agendas。International Review of Administrative Sciences,63(4),435-457。  new window
10.Foley, Kate(2002)。Local Economies and the Impact of the Privatization of Public Services。Local Economy,17(1),2-7。  new window
11.Welch, Eric W.、Wong, Wilson(2001)。Effects of Global Pressures on Public Bureaucracy: Modeling a New Theoretical Framework。Administration & Society,33(4),371-402。  new window
圖書
1.Horton, S.、Farnham, D.(2000)。Evaluating Human Resources Flexibilities: A Comparative。Human Resources Flexibility in the Pubic Service: International Perspectives。London:Macmillan Press。  new window
2.Dunleavy, Patrick(1991)。Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science。Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
3.McLaughlin, Kate、Osborne, Stephen P.、Frelie, Ewan(2002)。New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects。Routtedge Press。  new window
4.Pollitt, C.(1993)。Managerialism and the Public Services。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
5.劉維新(1997)。不平等的機會之島-香港大型企業集團的社會經濟意義。香港:文明的延續與斷裂?。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.香港特別行政區政府公務員事務局(2002)。立法會公務員及資助機構員工事務委員會控制公務員編制補充資料。立法會公務員及資助機構員工事務委員會控制公務員編制補充資料。香港。  延伸查詢new window
7.香港理工大學應用社會科學系社會政策研究中心(2002)。市民對公務員服務意見調查。市民對公務員服務意見調查。香港。  延伸查詢new window
8.Burns, John P.(2002)。Civil Service Reform in the Hong Kong SAR。The First Tung Chee-Hwa Administration: The First Five Years of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region。Hong Kong。  new window
其他
1.財經事務及庫務局(2002)。二零零一至零二年度資源增值報告-環境食物局、土木工程署,香港。  延伸查詢new window
2.財經事務及庫務局(2003)。二零零二至零三年度資源增值報告,香港。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁錦松(2003)。2003至04年政府財政預算案演辭,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.Light, Paul C.(1999)。The Changing Shape of Government,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peters, B. Guy(1996)。Models of Governance for the 1990s。The State of Public Management。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE