:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣天主教中學學校人力資源管理與學校效能相關之研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:翁健銘林梅琴 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Chien-mingLin, Mei-chin
出版日期:2005
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁83-115
主題關鍵詞:天主教中學人力資源管理學校效能Catholic high schoolsHuman resources managementSchool effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:897
  • 點閱點閱:58
本研究指在探討天主教中學學校人力資源管理與學校效能的關係,並瞭解不同學校環境變項之天主教中學在學校人力資源管理及學校效能向度上的差異情形,剖析學校人力資源管理對學校效能的預測作用。採用問卷調查法,以分層隨機抽樣的方式抽取20所天主教中學540位教職員為施測對象,進行問卷調查。問卷共發出 540份,回收384份,回收率71%,有效率67%。資料以平均數及標準差、T檢定、單因子變異數分析、積差相關與逐步多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析,發現下列結論。 首先,學校人力資源管理理論在教育組織上有其必要性與適用性。第二,目前天主教中學學校人力資源管理中,以人員招募與聘任的表現較佳,薪資報酬系統的努力空間最大;就學校效能現況方面,以課程與教學安排的表現較為理想,學生行為與學習表現則有努力空間。再者,學校人力資源管理在學校環境變項的差異情形,中型學校在「就職」的表現顯著優於小型與大型學校,中型學校在「績效評估」的表現顯著優於大型學校;學校效能部分,小型與大型學校在「教職員工作滿意度」的表現顯著優於中型學校。最後,天主教中學學校人力資源管理與學校效能間有正相關存在,而學校人力資源管理各向度對學校效能具有預測作用。 研究者建議,天主教中學宜建立符合本身特色的人力資源管理系統,以提升學校效能,讓學生獲得更好的教育品質。
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between human resources management and effectiveness of Catholic high schools in Taiwan. Through investigating the differences between human resources management and environmental characteristics of several Catholic high schools, the present study tries to explore whether the effectiveness of the schools could be predicted by human resources management practices. The present study adopts questionnaire surveys method. The population of the study includes teachers and administrative staff from 20 schools, involving 540 participants which were randomly selected by the stratified sampling method. The total usable number of questionnaires returned is 384 with a rate of 71%, and the analyzable data reaches 67%. Data was analyzed by using the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean and standard deviation, T-test, Person’s product-moment correlation, one-way ANOVA, and step-wise multiple regression. This study obtains several findings. First, human resources management theory is applicable to Catholic high schools in Taiwan. Second, in the practices of human resources management, Catholic high schools did the best in “recruiting and hiring”. However, they should put more efforts into “compensation systems”. In the effectiveness of the schools, “curriculum and instruction arrangement” gained the highest score among the scales, while the scores on “student behavior and learning” are the lowest. Third, there are significant differences between human resources management and effectiveness among school sizes. Fourth, human resources management is positively significant correlated with school effectiveness. That is, a variety of dimensions of human resources management could effectively predict school effectiveness. To sum up, for Catholic high schools in Taiwan, it is necessary to establish appropriate human resources management systems so they can provide students a better quality of education.
期刊論文
1.廖永靜(19960900)。當前學校人力資源管理的課題。人事月刊,23(3)=133,40-48。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cheng, Y. C.(1999)。The Pursuit of School Effectiveness and Educational Quality in Hong Kong。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,10(1),10-30。  new window
3.Dobzanski, J. L.(2000)。Human resource administration in Catholic school systems: a reflection of Catholic social teaching。Momentum,31(2),60-63。  new window
4.Don, D.、Kleiner, B. H.(1991)。The Nature of Effective Human Resource Planning。CUPA Journal,42(1),35-39。  new window
5.Holmes, T. A.(1998)。Performance-based approaches to human resource development。New Directions for Student Services,84,15-27。  new window
6.Wilkinson, G. A.(1997)。Beginning Teachers Identify Gaps in their Induction Programs。Journal of Staff Development,18(2),48-51。  new window
7.王瑞(20000600)。人力資源在企業競爭優勢中所扮演的角色。人力發展,77,41-52。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊錦洲、陳穆瑢(20010100)。我國高科技公司實施人力資源之狀況與成效之分析。人力資源發展月刊,161,1-10。  延伸查詢new window
9.Pfeffer, J.、Veiga, J. F.(1999)。Putting people first for organizational success。The Academy of Management Executive,13(2),37-48。  new window
10.Townsend, Tony(1997)。What makes schools effective? A comparison between school communities in Australia and USA。School Effectiveness and School Improvement,8(3),311-326。  new window
11.葉連祺(19980600)。國內有關學校效能研究之後設分析。國民教育研究學報,4,265-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.潘慧玲(19990900)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Stoll, L.、Fink, D.(1992)。Effecting school change: The Halton approach。School effectiveness and School Improvement,3(1),19-41。  new window
14.謝金青(19980200)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。新竹師院學報,11,449-486。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Purkey, Stewart C.、Smith, Marshall S.(1983)。Effective schools: A review。The Elementary School Journal,83(4),426-452。  new window
16.Cameron, Kim(1978)。Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education。Administrative Science Quarterly,23(4),604-633。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2001)。高級中等學校校別資料(教師、職員、校地)89學年度。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.魏建忠(2001)。綜合高中教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳孟謙(1998)。企業策略、人力資源策略、人力資源管理效能與組織績效關係之研究--以臺灣高科技產業為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳建鋒(2000)。學校本位管理與綜合高中學校效能相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林偉人(1998)。學校本位組織發展整合模式之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.郭淑琳(2000)。臺灣地區高職(中)工業類科學校教師第二專長進修、教師效能與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳慶安(2001)。高職工業類科學校組織學習能力與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
7.游進年(1990)。國民中學學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡培林(1993)。國民中學學校管理型態與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.施信華(2001)。綜合高中學生學習態度、教師效能與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳宗立(1998)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.呂祝義(1994)。國民中學學校環境.社區環境與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
12.卓秀冬(1995)。臺灣省高級中等學校組織文化與學校效能之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳培源(1995)。臺灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李佳霓(1999)。國民中學組織學習、教師個人學習與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭曜忠(2001)。高級中學行政主管知識管理態度、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳清山(1989)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃祈銘(1999)。我國高職(中)工業類科學校教師教育專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳清山(2000)。學校行政。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barber, M.、Evans, A.、Johnson, M.(1995)。An Evaluation of the National Scheme of School Teacher Appraisal。London:DfEE。  new window
3.Castetter, W. B.(1996)。The human resource function in education。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Dreher, G. F.、Dougherty, T. W.(2001)。Human resource strategy: A behavioral perspective for the general manager。Boston:McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Fowler, A.(1988)。Human resource management in local government。Harlow:Longman。  new window
6.Rebore, R. W.(1998)。Personnel administration in education: A management approach。Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.Ryan, K.(1986)。The induction of new teachers。Bloomington, IN:Phi Delta Kappa。  new window
8.吳秉恩(1999)。分享式人力資源管理--理念、程序與實務。臺北:翰蘆。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃英忠(1993)。現代管理學。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
10.何永福、楊國安(1995)。人力資源策略管理。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.Reid, K.、Hopkins, D.、Holly, P.(1987)。Towards the effective schools: The problems and some solution。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
12.Scheerens, J.、Bosker, R.(1997)。The foundation of educational effectiveness。New York:Pergamon。  new window
13.Wragg, E. C.、Wikelry, F. J.、Wragg, C. M.、Haynes, G. S.(1996)。Teacher Appraisal Observed。London:Routledge。  new window
14.張火燦(1998)。策略性人力資源管理。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Webb, L. Dean、Norton, M. Scott(1999)。Human Resources Administration: Personnel Issues and Needs in Education。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
16.黃振球(1992)。學校管理與績效。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Smith, R. E.(2001)。Human resources administration: A school-based perspective。New York:Eye On Education。  new window
18.Middlewood, D.、Lumby, J.(1998)。Human resource management in schools and colleges。Landon:Paul Chapman。  new window
19.Kleiman, Lawrence S.、劉秀娟、湯志安(1998)。人力資源管理--取得競爭優勢之利器。臺北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
20.蓋浙生(20020000)。教育經營與管理。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡進雄(20000000)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Seyfarth, J. T.(1996)。Personal management for effective schools。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
23.Robbins, Stephen P.(2001)。Organizational behavior。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
24.吳清山(19980000)。學校效能研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Scheerens, J.、Bosker, R. J.(1992)。Effective Schooling: research, theory and practice。London:Cassell。  new window
單篇論文
1.Frederick, J. M.(1987)。Measuring school effectiveness: Guidelines for educational practitioners(ED282891)。  new window
2.Johnson, J. R.,Rusch, F. R.(1993)。Education reform and special education: foundations for a national research agenda focused upon secondary education(ED358608)。  new window
3.Levine, D. U.,Lezotte, L. W.(1990)。Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice,Madison, WI:National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development。(ED330032)。  new window
4.Rajek, B.(1997)。Designing and implementing value focused effectiveness indicators(ED409957)。  new window
5.Roberts, K.(1995)。Applying a continuous quality improvement model to assess institutional effectiveness(ED396804)。  new window
6.Shann, M. H.(1990)。Making schools more effective: Indicators for improvement(ED327559)。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃同圳(2000)。人力資源管理策略:企業競爭優勢之新器。人力資源管理的12堂課。臺北:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE