:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣光碟片產業經營效率之研究
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:何文榮洪渭雯
作者(外文):Ho, Jerry Wen-rongHung, Wei-wen
出版日期:2005
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁1-23
主題關鍵詞:光碟片產業資料包絡分析法經營效率Malmquist生產力指數Compact disc industryDEAOperational efficiencyMalmquist
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:17
近年來隨著光碟片需求的大幅成長與光碟片的生產規模不斷擴增,造成光碟片廠商的價格競爭激烈。因此,光碟片廠商是否己對使用投入與產出資源做最有效的運用、及時檢討資源、浪費、和如何有效控制成本等問題,以創造有利的競爭優勢?都是廠商在競爭激烈的光碟片產業中,所面對的重要課題。 本文根據1999到2002年台灣十三家上市櫃光碟片廠商資料,利用資料包絡分析法及Malmquist生產力指數,評估各廠商之經營效率及生產力變動情形。研究結果如下: 一、E公司在整體技術效率、純粹技術效率和規模效率上,皆處於相對有效率。 二、Malmquist生產力指數表現較佳的廠商為A、B、D、E、F、G、H、I、K、L、N。
Along with the increase in demand of compact discs, and the improvement of industry production lines, price competition has increased significantly in the past few years. As a result, it becomes more important for companies to have effective self-evaluating systems to utilize resource optimally, to control production costs more effectively, and to create competitive advantages. There problems are all crucial to the survival of compact discs industry. This research uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist to evaluate the efficiency of 13 compact disc firms from 1999 to 2002. The results found that: 1. E firm in overall technical efficiency 、pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency aspects are all relatively more effective. 2. The Malmquist index demonstrates that A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L and M perform better.
期刊論文
1.王永昌、何文榮(2002)。台灣儲蓄互助社營運效率之評估。企業管理學報,55。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Fare, R.(1994)。Biased Technical Change and the Malmquist Productivity Index。Scandinavian Journal of Economics,99,119-127。  new window
3.Kozmetsky, G.、Yue, P.(1998)。Comparative Performance of Global Semiconductor Companies。Management Science,26(2),153-175。  new window
4.Lovell, C. A. K.(1994)。Linear Programming Approaches to the Measurement and Analysis of Productive Efficiency。Top,2,175-248。  new window
5.Seiford, L. M.、Thrall, R. M.(1990)。Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Approach to Frontier Analysis。Journal of Econometrics,46(1/2),7-38。  new window
6.Thore, Sten、Philips, Fren、Ruefli, T. W.、Yue, P.(1996)。DEA And The Management of The product Cycle: The U.S. Computer Industry。Computer & Operation Research,23(4),341-356。  new window
7.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
8.Seiford, Lawrence M.(1996)。Data Envelopment Analysis: The Evolution of the state of the Art (1978-1995)。Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis,7(2/3),99-137。  new window
9.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
研究報告
1.徐守德(1998)。我國銀行經營與風險管理之研究--臺灣商業銀行的技術性效率。  延伸查詢new window
2.張秀雲(1998)。臺灣地區商業銀行之績效研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭文英(1996)。以DEA評估臺灣地區銀行效能及效能變動。  延伸查詢new window
4.霍熾榮(1997)。我國商業銀行經營績效之再評估。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Lewin, A. Y.、Seiford, L. M.(1994)。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications。Kluwer。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ali, A, I.、Seiford, L. M.(1993)。The Mathematical Programming Approach to Efficiency Analysis。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Lovell, C. A. K.(1993)。Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency--techniques and applications。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top