:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構概念本位統整教學模式之研究
書刊名:當代教育研究
作者:徐綺穗 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Chi-sui
出版日期:2005
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁69-102
主題關鍵詞:統整教學概念教學課程統整Integrated teachingConcept teachingCurriculum integration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:121
  • 點閱點閱:42
期刊論文
1.徐綺穗(19950600)。概念教學模式之探討。初等教育學報,8,199-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.King, Alison(1992)。Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning。Educational Psychologist,27(1),111-126。  new window
3.Duit, Reinders(1991)。On the Role of Analogies and Metaphors in Learning Science。Science Education,75(6),649-672。  new window
4.Case, D. O.(1991)。Conceptual organization and retrieval of text by historians: the role of memory and metaphor。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,42(9),657-668。  new window
5.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Soloway, E.(1997)。Enacting project-based science。The Elementary School Journal,97(4),341-358。  new window
6.郭金美(19961100)。Students' Conceptual Change about Light。嘉義師院學報,10,407-453。  延伸查詢new window
7.Meyer, Debra K.、Turner, Julianne C.、Spencer, Cynthia A.(1997)。Challenge in a Mathematics Classroom: Students' Motivation and Strategies in Project-based Learning。The Elementary School Journal,97(5),501-521。  new window
8.Tessmer, M.、Wilson, B.、Driscoll, M. P.(1990)。A new model of concept teaching and learning。Educational technology research and development,38(1),45-53。  new window
9.宋佩芬、周鳳美(20030100)。教師應付九年一貫課程改革的態度與原因:試辦階段的觀察。課程與教學,6(1),95-112+169。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Brophy, J.、Alleman, J.(1991)。A caveat: Curriculum integration isn't always a good idea。Educational Leadership,49(2),66。  new window
11.Zeitoun, H. H.(1984)。Teaching scientific analogies: A proposed model。Research in Science and Technological Education,2(2),107-125。  new window
12.Tennyson, Robert D.、Cocchiarella, Martin J.(1986)。An Empirically Based Instructional Design Theory for Teaching Concepts。Review of Educational Research,56(1),40-71。  new window
13.林生傳(19960600)。概念教學對概念發展的實驗效果--階次理論模式的概念教學實驗。教育學刊,12,31-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.邱美虹(19931100)。類比與科學概念的學習。教育研究資訊,1(6),79-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Fogarty, Robin(1991)。Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum。Educational Leadership,49(2),61-65。  new window
16.黃譯瑩(19981000)。課程統整之意義探究與模式建構。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,8(4),616-633。  延伸查詢new window
17.甄曉蘭(20010100)。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學,4(1),1-19+165。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Ausubel, D. P.(1960)。The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of Meaningful Verbal Learning。Journal of Educational Psychology,51,267-272。  new window
19.Collins, A.(1994)。Goal-based Scenarios and the Problem of Situated Learning: A Commentary on Anersen Consutling's Design of Goal-based Scenarion。Educational Technology,34(9),30-32。  new window
20.Dunn, Carolyn S.(1983)。The Influence of Instructional Methods on Concept Learning。Science Education,67(5),647-656。  new window
21.Frykholm, Jeffrey A.、Meyer, Margaret R.(2002)。Integrated Instruction: Is It Science? Is It Mathematics?。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,7(9),502-508。  new window
22.Glazer, Susan Mandel(2000)。Making Connections。Teaching Pre K-8,30(4),100-103。  new window
23.Martin, Vicky L.、Pressley, Michael(1991)。Elaborative-interrogation Effects Depend on the Nature of the Question。Journal of Educational Psychology,83(1),113-119。  new window
24.Nuthall, Graham(1999)。The Way Students Learn: Acquiring Knowledge from an Integrated Science and Social Studies Unit。The Elementary School Journal,99(4),303-341。  new window
25.Schwalbach, Eileen M.、Dosemagen, Debra M.(2000)。Developing Student Understanding: Contextualizing Calculus Concepts。School Science and Mathematics,100(2),90-98。  new window
會議論文
1.許翠華、劉美娥(1999)。邁向課程新紀元。九年一貫課程研討會。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。275-286。  延伸查詢new window
2.McKeough, Anne(1992)。Program Development Criteria for Curricula Designed To Teach Central Conceptual Structures。0。  new window
3.Sanchez, Adolfo、Lopez, Luz E.(1993)。Making Connections: An In-depth Concept Teaching Technique。0。  new window
4.Schramm, Susan(1997)。Related Webs of Meaning between the Disciplines: Perceptions of Secondary Students Who Experienced an Integrated Curriculum。0。  new window
5.Yarnall, Louise、Kafai, Yasmin(1996)。Issues in Project-based Science Activities: Children's Constructions of Ocean Software Games。0。  new window
研究報告
1.Freiburger, Susan M.、Brooks, Sandra R.、Grotheer, Debra R.(1998)。Improving Elementary Student Engagement in the Learning Process through Integrated Thematic Instruction。0。  new window
2.Marzano, Robert J.、Hutchins, C. L.(1985)。Thinking Skills: A Conceptual Framework. A Special Issue of "Noteworthy"。0。  new window
學位論文
1.陳淨宜(2002)。環境教育融入生活課程模組開發之行動研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃明信(2002)。國小網路專題式教學模式之設計(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃韻潔(2001)。統整課程設計與實施歷程之個案研究--以竹塹國小為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.何縕琪(1999)。國小教師主題統整教學歷程之分析暨合作省思專業成長模式之建構(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳玉玲(2000)。概念改變教學策略對地球運動概念之教學效果--以國小六年級學生為例(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳芙蓉(2000)。愛籽國小「主題活動」統整課程發展之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉興華(2000)。我國國小推行課程統整之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭淑慧(2000)。國民小學課程統整設計之個案研究--以華山國小為例(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊雅玲(2000)。STS模式的教學對學生學習成效之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.王瑞芬(2002)。以螞蟻為主題之統整課程設計與實務教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.賴麗琴(2001)。以「地球系統」為統整主軸之多元教學模組的研發與實踐,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.尹曼莉(2002)。基因改造生物教學模組設計研究,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳志峰(2002)。國小實施「鄉土教育」及「自然與生活科技」統整課程之行動研究,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳瓊誠(2001)。統整課程實施方式與評量之研究:以「圓柱與圓錐」為主題,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.林靜芳(2000)。國中社會科統整課程的設計與發展:以兩所國中教師小組課程發展為例,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.張資兩(2002)。以STS教育理念發展統整課程之行動研究,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
17.曾世君(2000)。主題式教學活動設計實施之個案研究,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fredericks, A. D.、Blake-Kline, B、Kristo, J. V.(1996)。Teaching the integrated language arts: Process and practice。New York:Longman。  new window
2.Clark, Barbara(1986)。Optimizing Learning: The Integrative Education Model in the Classroom。Columbus, Ohio:Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
3.Drake, Susan M.、黃光雄、方德隆、卯靜儒、高新建、黃淑慧、葉郁菁、蔡清田、甄曉蘭、顧瑜君(2001)。統整課程的設計 : 證實能增進學生學習的方法。高雄市:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Clarke, J. H.、Agne, R. M.(1997)。Interdisciplinary high school teaching: strategies for integrated learning。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Erickson, H. L.(1998)。Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts。Corwin Press。  new window
6.Drake, S. M.(1993)。Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.Beane, James A.(1997)。Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education。Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
8.Joyce, B.、Weil, M.(1996)。Models of Teaching。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
9.Charbonneau, M. P.(1995)。The Integrated Elementary Classroom: A Developmental Model of Education for the 21st Century。The Integrated Elementary Classroom: A Developmental Model of Education for the 21st Century。Needham Heights, MA。  new window
10.Kovalik, S.、Olsen, K.(1994)。ITI: The Model. Integrated Thematic Instruction。ITI: The Model. Integrated Thematic Instruction。沒有紀錄。  new window
11.Glynn, S. M.(1989)。The Teaching with Analogies Model。Children's Comprehension of Text: Research into Practice。Newark, DE。  new window
圖書論文
1.徐靜嫻(2000)。課程統整的另類思維:談後設課程的統整。課程統整與教學。臺北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jacobs, H. H.(1989)。Design options for an integrated curriculum。Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
3.Weinstein, Claire E.、Mayer, Richard E.(1986)。The Teaching of Learning Strategies。Handbook of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan Press。  new window
4.鄭明長(2000)。統整教學的意涵與模式。課程統整與教學。臺北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE