:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:身心障礙者「個人協助」的定位探討:以「視力協助員」服務為例
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:王育瑜 引用關係
出版日期:2005
卷期:12
頁次:頁89+91-137
主題關鍵詞:身心障礙者視覺障礙者個人協助視力協助員個人助理Disabled peopleVisually impaired peoplePersonal assistanceVisual assistantPersonal assistant
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
聯合國自一九八0年代至今,不斷提倡身心障礙者「平等且全面參與社會」的權利之保障,而「個人協助」服務的提供,乃該權利是否能獲得充分保障的關鍵因素。身心障礙者所需要的「個人協助」是多面向的,涉及社會生活的各個層面,包括生活、教育、就業等等方面。然而,目前為止,臺灣雖已發展居家服務與臨時暨短期照顧等「照顧式的」服務,卻缺乏工作中的「個人協助」服務。有鑑於此,財團法人愛盲文教基金會參考西方「個人協助」的概念,於九十一與九十二年度,發展「視力協助員」服務,企圖滿足視障者在工作中的協助需求。 本研究的目的,在於了解該實驗方案對於使用服務的視障者之意義與滿足需求情形,及方案工作人員與視協員的看法,採取質性研究的文件分析與深度訪談方法蒐集資料。研究發現:視協員服務使視障者對於工作有較多的掌控、使視障者無須被迫依賴非正式支持系統,然而,在服務提供上卻有較小的掌控力,此外,在服務面向的設定、方案管理監督、雇主的宣導與職務再設計的強化等等方面仍有許多待改進之處。
Since 1980s, the United Nations has been advocating for the ‘full participation and equality’ of disabled people. ‘Personal Assistance’ is one key factor in bringing the idea of guaranteeing disabled people’s rights into practice. Disabled people’s needs for personal assistance are multi-dimensional, which include: daily life, education, employment, etc.. In Taiwan, however, there are services provided to ‘care for’ disabled people but not to support disabled people at work. In view of this, The Cultural and Educational Foundation for the Blind (CEFB) developed a pilot scheme which provided ‘visual assistant service’ for visually impaired persons. The aim of this study is to understand how visually impaired users experienced the service and how the service met the needs, as well as the views of the project workers and visual assistants. The main findings are: First, the ‘visual assistant service’ has improved visually impaired workers’ sense of control at work, and reduced their enforced reliance on their informal support systems. Nevertheless, they have little control over the way the services were provided. In addition, the author suggests some points to improve in the future, regarding the dimensions of services provided, the monitor of the program, enhanced communication with employers and more efforts on job accommodation.
期刊論文
1.Brisenden, S.(1986)。Independent Living and the Medical Model of Disability。Disability, Handicap and Society,1(2),173-178。  new window
2.Askheim, O. P.(1999)。Personal Assistance for Disabled People: The Norwegian Experience。International Journal of Social Welfare,8(2),111-119。  new window
3.Baker, J.(2002)。On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation。Disability & Rehabilitation,24(18),992。  new window
4.Cardol M.、de Jong BA, Ward C.(2002)。On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation。Disability & Rehabilitation,24,970-974。  new window
5.Carmichael, Angie、Brown, Louise(2002)。The Future Challenge for Direct Payments。Disability & Society,17 (7),797-808。  new window
6.Kennedy, J.(1997)。Personal assistance benefits and federal health care reforms: who is eligible on the basis of ADL assistance criteria? (Disability and Health Care Policy: Medical Coverage, Service Provision and Professional Preparation)。The Journal of Rehabilitation,63(3),40-45。  new window
7.Kersten, P.(2002)。Autonomy: the be all and end all in rehabilitation。Disability & Rehabilitation,24(18),993-995。  new window
8.Litvak, S.(1998)。Personal Assistance Services Policy: Where we have been and where we are going。American Rehabilitation,24(4),9-14。  new window
9.Morris, J.(2001)。Impairment and Disability: Constructing an Ethics of Care That Promotes Human Rights。Hypatia,16(4),1-18。  new window
10.Reindal, S. M.(1999)。Independence, dependence, interdependence: some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy。Disability & Society,14(3),353-367。  new window
11.Rock, P. J.(1988)。Independence: what it means to six disabled people living in the community。Disability, Handicap & Society,3,27-35。  new window
會議論文
1.Ratzka, A.(1997)。Independent Living and our organizations。Hungary。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部統計處、行政院衛生署、行政院勞工委員會(2001)。中華民國八十九年台閩地區身心障礙者生活需求調查報告。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barnes, C.(1993)。Making our own choices: Independent living, personal assistance and disabled people。London。  new window
圖書
1.Wang, Y.(2001)。Promoting the Right to Work of Disabled People? A Historical Comparative Analysis of Sweden, Great Britain and Taiwan。Canterbury:University of Kent at Canterbury。  new window
2.Oliver, M.(1996)。Understanding disability: From theory to practice。Macmillan Press。  new window
3.Brisenden, S.(1989)。A charter for personal care, Progress。London。  new window
4.Hesler, F.、Campbell, J.、Zarb, G.(1999)。Direct Routes to Independence: A guide to local authority implementation and management of direct payments。London。  new window
5.Lonsdale, S.(1990)。Women and Disability: The Experience of physical disability among women。London:Macmillan Education Ltd.。  new window
6.Morris, J.(1993)。Independent Lives。Tavistock。  new window
7.Oliver, M.(1991)。Social Work: Disabled People and Disabling Environments。London。  new window
8.Thomas, S.、Wolfensberger, W.(1999)。An Overview of Social Role Valorization。A Quarter-Century of Normalization and Social Role Valorization: Evolution and Impact \\ Flynn, R. J. ; Lemay, R. A. (ed.)。Ottawa。  new window
9.United Nations(1993)。The Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities。New York:United Nations。  new window
其他
1.ECEPA Webpages。  new window
2.ILRU(1999)。An International Summit Conference on Independent Living。  new window
3.Martinez, K.(2003)。Independent Living in the U.S. & Canada。  new window
4.Ratzka, A.(1992)。What is personal assistance?。  new window
5.Ratzka(2003)。Independent Living in Sweden。  new window
6.Ratzka(2004)。Model National Personal Assistance Policy. A project of the European Center for Excellence in Personal Assistance (ECEPA)。  new window
7.STIL(1996)。Report of docs1/ENIL Seminar on Personal Assistance。  new window
8.Zarb, G.(2003)。The Economics of Independent Living。  new window
圖書論文
1.Oliver, M.(1989)。Disability and dependency: a creation of industrial societies。Disability and Dependency。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top