期刊論文1. | 邵宇奇(1999)。美國電腦相關發明案例(功能步驟、法定標的)之探討〉。智慧財產權,3,34-48。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
2. | 邵宇奇(2000)。再談美國專利請求項之功能手段(步驟)元件。智慧財產權,16,10-14。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
3. | 洪瑞章(2000)。論功能手段語言申請專利範圍之解釋。智慧財産季刊,33,74-78。 延伸查詢![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
4. | Beyers, Robert、Yang, Joseph、Laurie, Ronald(2002)。A United Framework for Patent Claims Construction。Pli/Pat,714,425。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
5. | Kandara, John N.(2000)。Application oj the Doctrine of hauivalents to Means Plus Function L laims: WMS Gaming Inc. V, International Game Technology。DUKE LJ,50,887。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
6. | Lee, William F.、Paige, Eugene M.(1998)。Means Plus and Step Plus Function Claims: Do We only Know Them When We See Them?。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y,80,251。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
7. | Oberdick, Todd M.(2002)。Section 112, Paragraph 6-Means Claim and Limitation to Specific Algorithm-Is this a Stricter Standard than Gentry Gallery and Related Mechanical Cases?。Pace L. Rev.,22,385。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
8. | Spaeth, Frederick A.(2001)。"Equivalents thereof" v. the Doctrine of Equivalents in the Interpretation of U.S. Patent Claims。Qlr,20,487。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
9. | Ulbrich, Scott G.(2002)。Festo, Notice and the Application of Prosecution History Estoppel to Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitations。Wm. MITCHELL L. Rev.,28,1165。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
10. | Brownlee, David W.(1999)。The Scope of Equivalents Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 P6 Should Vary Depending on Importance of the Means-Plus-Function Recitation to the Invention as a Whole。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y,81,451。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
11. | Clinton, Tobi Carver(2000)。Infringement and Software Claimed Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6: Software Function is the Important Part。Va. J.L. & Tech.,5,4。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
12. | Neils, Paul F.(2002)。35 U.S.C. § 112, SIXTH PARAGRAPH LIMITATIONS: HOW EFFECTIVELY TO REBUT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF EQUIVALENCE DURING PATENT EXAMINATION。IDEA,43,139。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
13. | Nwamu, Fidel D.(1999)。DOES YOUR CLAIM CONFORM TO MEANS-PLUS-FUNCTION FORMAT UNDER SECTION 112, PARAGRAPH SIX?: O.I. CORP. V. TEKMAR CO.。J. INTELL. Prop. L.,6,189。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |
14. | Stover, Chad S. C.(2001)。Deciphering Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitation Infringement under § 112, Paragraph 6: Finding Certainty in the Uncertain Case Law。N.C. J. L. & Tech.,3,101。 ![](/gs32/thssjcncl/image/nclsfx.gif) ![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png) |