:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:申請專利範圍之手段功能用語解釋及其侵害判斷
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:陳佳麟
作者(外文):Chen, Jia-lin
出版日期:2005
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁147-203
主題關鍵詞:手段功能用語步驟功能用語均等論禁反言Means plus functionStep plus functionDoctrine of equivalentsProsecution estoppel
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
期刊論文
1.邵宇奇(1999)。美國電腦相關發明案例(功能步驟、法定標的)之探討〉。智慧財產權,3,34-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.邵宇奇(2000)。再談美國專利請求項之功能手段(步驟)元件。智慧財產權,16,10-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.洪瑞章(2000)。論功能手段語言申請專利範圍之解釋。智慧財産季刊,33,74-78。  延伸查詢new window
4.Beyers, Robert、Yang, Joseph、Laurie, Ronald(2002)。A United Framework for Patent Claims Construction。Pli/Pat,714,425。  new window
5.Kandara, John N.(2000)。Application oj the Doctrine of hauivalents to Means Plus Function L laims: WMS Gaming Inc. V, International Game Technology。DUKE LJ,50,887。  new window
6.Lee, William F.、Paige, Eugene M.(1998)。Means Plus and Step Plus Function Claims: Do We only Know Them When We See Them?。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y,80,251。  new window
7.Oberdick, Todd M.(2002)。Section 112, Paragraph 6-Means Claim and Limitation to Specific Algorithm-Is this a Stricter Standard than Gentry Gallery and Related Mechanical Cases?。Pace L. Rev.,22,385。  new window
8.Spaeth, Frederick A.(2001)。"Equivalents thereof" v. the Doctrine of Equivalents in the Interpretation of U.S. Patent Claims。Qlr,20,487。  new window
9.Ulbrich, Scott G.(2002)。Festo, Notice and the Application of Prosecution History Estoppel to Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitations。Wm. MITCHELL L. Rev.,28,1165。  new window
10.Brownlee, David W.(1999)。The Scope of Equivalents Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 P6 Should Vary Depending on Importance of the Means-Plus-Function Recitation to the Invention as a Whole。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y,81,451。  new window
11.Clinton, Tobi Carver(2000)。Infringement and Software Claimed Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6: Software Function is the Important Part。Va. J.L. & Tech.,5,4。  new window
12.Neils, Paul F.(2002)。35 U.S.C. § 112, SIXTH PARAGRAPH LIMITATIONS: HOW EFFECTIVELY TO REBUT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF EQUIVALENCE DURING PATENT EXAMINATION。IDEA,43,139。  new window
13.Nwamu, Fidel D.(1999)。DOES YOUR CLAIM CONFORM TO MEANS-PLUS-FUNCTION FORMAT UNDER SECTION 112, PARAGRAPH SIX?: O.I. CORP. V. TEKMAR CO.。J. INTELL. Prop. L.,6,189。  new window
14.Stover, Chad S. C.(2001)。Deciphering Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitation Infringement under § 112, Paragraph 6: Finding Certainty in the Uncertain Case Law。N.C. J. L. & Tech.,3,101。  new window
會議論文
1.徐瑞如(2002)。申請專利範圍中裝置加功能元件之解釋的最廣合理範園。2002年全國科技法律硏討會,31-38。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉孔中、宿希成(2000)。電腦程式相關發明之專利保護--法律與技術之分析。翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅炳榮(2004)。工業財產權論叢--專利侵害與迴避設計篇。翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Durham, Alan L.(1999)。PATENT LAW ESSENTIALS。  new window
4.Kahrl, Robert C.(2001)。Patent Claim Construction。Aspen Law & Business Publishers。  new window
其他
1.Surber, James B(2001)。Indefinite Means-Plus-Function Patent Claims: What Should be the Standard。  new window
2.Kuester, Jeffrey R.(20050302)。Means-Plus-Function Claiming: Recent Developments and New Consideration,http://www.kuesterlaw.com/mpf.html。  new window
3.(2001)。Manual of Patent Examining Procedure,http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/mpep.htm, 2004/03/02。  new window
4.Mizurmoto, Chris T.,Hiraki & Associates(20050302)。Translation of Supreme Court Decision on the Doctrine of Equivalents,http://www.okuyama.com/doe.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nydegger, Rick D.、Richards, Jonathan W.(2000)。Design-Around Techniques。ELECTRONIC and SOFTWARE PATENTS。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE