:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論荀子的刑罰觀
書刊名:萬竅
作者:趙敏芝 引用關係
作者(外文):Chao, Ming-tzi
出版日期:2005
卷期:2
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:荀子刑罰XunziRitualPunishment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:32
死刑乃剝奪犯罪行為人生命法益之刑罰,為所有刑罰種類中最嚴厲者。自古以來,即為許多國家所援用,可見此一刑罰自有其存在價值。 然而隨著人類思想之變遷,尤其是十八世紀以降,人權思想之發展運帶地使到許多學者開始思考執行死刑合不合時宜。於是死刑制度之存廢,遂由宗教問題,一變而為社會問題,進而成為刑法上論爭之焦點。本不對不擬重複討論彼此爭議點,僅想從荀子的刑罰觀點來試探刑存廢的可能。 由於死刑存廢關乎人的生命觀,即生命價值之認肯。各方論辯又多各有各的考量。因此至今仍莫衷一是。而我之所以覺得可從荀子「禮」之思想進行討論,一則是因荀子常禮法連用,且曾云:「治之經,禮與型,君子以修百性寧,明德慎罰,國家既治,四海平。」〈成相〉卻仍堅定禮制的不可替代性;一則道德建設之目的是在揚善,法制建設之目的是抑惡;以刑輔德本為立政之準則,若僅以「刑」論「法」, 以「抑惡」作為「揚善」的先決條件,那便是本末倒置;必將全面失去對人性尊嚴之關注。故而,筆者透過對禮、法、刑的關係,試推論荀子可能的答案。
Capital punishment, the strictest penalty, is that the government takes away the criminal’s life, who is the citizen with the legal rights in the country. Many governments have executed the criminals since the ancients times; therefore, it has the value and important reasons for preserving the death penalty. Since human beings’ thoughts changed, especially form the 18th century, the development of the human rights has been making the execution of capital punishment be evaluated and negotiated as an appropriate punishment or not. The abolishment or preserve of capital punishment, which is the focus of argument in the legalism, has turned into a social problem instead of a religious problem. This study attempts to discuss the possibility of abolishing or preserving capital punishment form Xunzi’s points of view instead of repeating the preceding controversies. The abolishment or preserve of capital punishment is related to the acknowledgement of legal rights for human life that is the value of life. Different points of view revealing from various debates and negotiations have difficulty resulting in the one and only conclusion. The discussion of this study would be focused on the basis of Xunzi’s thought “ritual”. First, Xunzi always connects legalism with ritual and insists no substitute for ritual. He said,「The principles of governing a country must be based on creating the rituals and instituting laws. The sages and gentlemen can carry them out in order to deserve honor, the common people think they have the correct ways to follow. People comprehend the moral practice and follow the rules to avoid being punished. If the country is well controlled in the way, the world will be always in peace.」(成相) Second, settings on the moral principles is to honor and express people’s good; the establishment of the laws is to remove the evil people from society. The moral principles assisted with the laws can build the standard of managing a country. If the “punishment” and “removing the evil” are considered ahead of “the laws” and “the honor of good”, people have no idea of the correct ways to follow, and completely lose the concern for the respect of human nature. Viewing the connection of “ritual”, “legalism” and “punishment”, I try to analyze and integrate Xunzi’s perspective for capital punishment.
期刊論文
1.吳文璋(19911100)。荀子哲學與權威主義。孔孟月刊,30(3)=351,3-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.小林直樹、李鴻禧(19790900)。生存權思想及問題。憲政思潮,47,92-101。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭力為(19710600)。綜論荀子思想之性格。中國學人,3,109-122。  延伸查詢new window
4.薛保綸(19780500)。荀子的心學。哲學與文化,5(5),53-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hood, Roger(1990)。The Death Penalty: A Word-Wide Perspective。Oxford:Oxford Clarendon Press。  new window
2.牟宗三(1987)。名家與荀子。學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.耿雲卿(1982)。先秦法律思想與自然法。商務。  延伸查詢new window
4.周群振(19870400)。荀子思想研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.李滌生(1988)。荀子集解。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.馬歇爾(1997)。死刑是對生命尊嚴的否定。解構死亡--死亡、自殺、安樂死與死刑的剖析。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.萊瑟(1997)。一個死刑的報復性論証。解構死亡--死亡、自殺、安樂死與死刑的剖析。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.畢道(1997)。反對死刑的報復主義說明。解構死亡--死亡、自殺、安樂死與死刑的咅晰。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡克(1997)。死刑限定使用。解構死亡--死亡、自殺、安樂死與死刑的剖析。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
5.范登海格(1997)。死刑贊成與反對。解構死亡--死亡、自殺、安樂死與死刑的剖析。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.王邦雄(1983)。論荀子的心性關係及其價值根源。中國哲學論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE