:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Argument-Function Linking in Resultatives
書刊名:Concentric: Studies in Linguistics
作者:何萬順
作者(外文):Her, One-soon
出版日期:2004
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:論旨準則結果句吸收隱藏詞彙功能語法控管θ-criterionLinkingResultativesLFGAbsorbSuppressControl
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:170
Carrier and Randall(1992)對英語結果句的分析與Li(1995)對漢語結果複合詞的分析有一個顯著的共通點,就是對於論旨準則(θ-Criterion)的從寬解釋,允許一個句法論元獲得一個以上的論旨角色。本文贊同以上兩篇論文所提出的詞組結構及論旨結構分析,但堅決認為不應且無須犧牲論旨角色與句法功能一對一的連結關係。本文所提出的分析以詞彙功能語法(LFG)中的彙照映理論(LMT)為理論基礎,以功能結構為句法訊息之核心,連結論旨結構與詞組結構。對漢語結果複合詞的分析利用了論旨角色吸收(absorb)或隱藏(suppress)的概念,英語的分析則利用了功能控管(control)的概念;兩者都是句法理論中既有、普遍且合理的概念。
This paper challenges one prominent common feature in Carrier and Randall’s (1992) account of English resultative constructions and Li’s (1995) account of Chinese resultative compounds: a weakening of the θ-Criterion by allowing more than one theta role to be assigned to an argument position. While accepting the argument structures and the constituent structures these two papers have argued for, this paper demonstrates that strict one-to-one argument-function linking should not and need not be relaxed and how it is maintained in an account formulated in a simplified lexical mapping theory of LFG, where a feature structure interfaces between the constituent structure and the argument structure. The account of Chinese resultatives hinges upon role suppression, a notion independently motivated; the account of English resultatives relies on functional control, also an independently motivated notion.
期刊論文
1.Bresnan, J.(1994)。Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar。Language,70(1),72-131。  new window
2.Bresnan, Joan、Moshi, Lioba(1990)。Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax。Linguistic Inquiry,21(2),147-185。  new window
3.Bresnan, Joan、Kanerva, Johni M.(1989)。Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar。Linguistic Inquiry,20(1),1-50。  new window
4.Huang, Chu-Ren(19930400)。Mandarin Chinese and the Lexical Mapping Theory--A Study of the Interaction of Morphology and argument Changing。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,62(2),337-388。  new window
5.張寧(20040100)。Move is Remerge。語言暨語言學,5(1),189-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Keenan, Edward Louis、Comrie, Bernard(1977)。Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar。Linguistic Inquiry,8(1),63-100。  new window
7.Li, Yafei(1990)。On V-V compounds in Chinese。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,8(2),177-207。  new window
8.Carrier, Jill、Randall, Janet H.(1992)。The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives。Linguistic Inquiry,23(3),173-234。  new window
9.Dowty, David R.(1991)。Thematic proto-roles and argument selection。Language,67(3),547-619。  new window
10.吳靜慧(20040100)。On de/bu and the Syntactic Nature of Resultative Verbal Compounding。語言暨語言學,5(1),271-329。new window  new window
11.Hovav, Malka Rappaport、Levin, Beth(2001)。An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives。Language,77(4),766-797。  new window
12.Li, Yafei(1995)。The thematic hierarchy and causativity。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,13(2),255-282。  new window
13.Babby, Leonard(1989)。Subjectlessness, external subcategorization, and the Projection Principle。Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju I lingvistiku,32,7-40。  new window
14.何萬順(2003)。Chinese inversion constructions within a simplified LMT。Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph,19。  new window
15.Hoekstra, Teun(1998)。Small clause results。Lingua,74(2/3),101-139。  new window
16.Nornstein, Norbert(1998)。Movement and chains。Syntax,1(2),99-127。  new window
17.Levin, Beth、Rappaport, Malka(1986)。The formation of adjective passives。Linguistic Inquiry,17,623-661。  new window
會議論文
1.何萬順(2005)。Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin Chinese : A lexical mapping account。Harvard University。  new window
2.Huang, Chu-Ren、林甫雯(1992)。Composite event structure and complex predicates: A template-based approach to argument selection。Bloomington, IN。90-108。  new window
3.Rappaport, Tova R.(1986)。Nonverbal predication in Hebrew。  new window
學位論文
1.Verspoor, Cornelia Maria(1997)。Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics(博士論文)。University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh。  new window
2.黃正德(1982)。Logical Structures in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar。  new window
3.Chung, Karen Steffen(2004)。Mandarin Compound Verbs。  new window
圖書
1.Emonds, Joseph E.(1985)。Dordrecht:Foris。  new window
2.Shieber, Stuart(1986)。Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar。Stanford, CA:CSLI, Stanford University。  new window
3.Pesetsky, David M.(1995)。Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
4.Levin, Beth、University of Chicago(1993)。English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation。Chicago, IIl。  new window
5.Levin, Beth、Hovav, Malka Rappaport(1995)。Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface。MIT Press。  new window
6.Radford, Andrew(2004)。Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.何萬順(19970000)。Interaction and Variation in the Chinese Vo Construction。臺北市:文鶴。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Grimshaw, Jane B.(1990)。Argument Structure。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
9.Chomsky, Noam(1982)。Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
10.Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures。Foris Publications。  new window
11.Pustejovsky, James(1995)。The Generative Lexicon。MIT Press。  new window
12.Ackerman, Farrell(1992)。Complex predicates and morpholexical relatedness: Locative alternation in Hungarian。Lexical Matters。Stanford。  new window
13.Alsina, Alex(1996)。The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance。The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance。Stanford, CA。  new window
14.Alsina, Alex、Mchombo, Sam A.(1993)。Object asymmetries and the Chichewa applicative construction。Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar。Stanford, CA。  new window
15.Bresnan, Joan(2001)。Lexical-Funcational Syntax。Oxford。  new window
16.Bresnan, Joan、Kanerva, Jonni(1992)。The thematic hierarchy and locative inversion in UG: A reply to Shachter‘s comments。Syntax and Semantics: Syntax and the Lexicon。New York, NY。  new window
17.Bresnan, Joan、Zaenen, Annie(1990)。Deep unaccusativity in LFG。Grammatical Relations: A Cross-theoretical Perspective。Stanford, CA。  new window
18.Dalrymple, Mary(2001)。Lexical-Functional Gramma。Lexical-Functional Gramma。New York, NY。  new window
19.Falk, Yehuda(2001)。Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Constraint-based Syntax。Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Constraint-based Syntax。Stanford, CA。  new window
20.Hornstein, Norbert(2001)。M! A Minimalist Theory of Construal。M! A Minimalist Theory of Construal。Oxford。  new window
21.Kayne, Richard S.(1985)。Principles of participle constructions。Grammatical representation。Foris。  new window
22.Kratzer, Angelika(2004)。Building resultativess。Grammatical representation。Foris。  new window
23.Sells, P.(1986)。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Stanford, CA。  new window
24.Simpson, Jane(1991)。Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach。Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach。Dordrecht。  new window
25.Wechsler, Stephen(1997)。Resultative predicates and control。Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The Syntax and Semantics of Predication。Austin, TX。  new window
26.Zaenen, Annie、Engdahl, Elizabeth(1994)。Descriptive and theoretical syntax in the lexicon。Conceptual Approaches to the Lexicon。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.Ackerman, Farrell,Moore, John(2001)。Dowtyian proto-properties and Lexical Mapping Theory,Hong Kong。  new window
2.Alsina, Alex(1996)。Resultatives: A joint operation of semantic and syntactic structures。  new window
3.Fontanals, Jaume Mateu(2002)。The DOR regained: Evidence from English and Dutch,Reykjavik, Iceland。  new window
4.Francez, Nissim,Wintner, Shuly(2003)。Unificatuion Grammars。  new window
5.McCloskey, James(1999)。On the distribution of subject properties in Irish。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lødrup, Helge(2000)。Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The case of Norwegian existentials and resultatives。Argument Realization。Stanford, CA:CSLI Publications。  new window
2.Kaplan, Ronald M.、Bresnan, Joan(1982)。Lexical-functional Grammar: A formal System for Grammatical Representation。The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
3.Simpson, Jane(1983)。Resultatives。Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar。Bloomington, Indiana:University Linguistics Club。  new window
4.Chomsky, Noam(2000)。Minimalist inquiries: the framework。Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik。MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE