資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.172.160)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Argument-Function Linking in Resultatives
書刊名:
Concentric: Studies in Linguistics
作者:
何萬順
作者(外文):
Her, One-soon
出版日期:
2004
卷期:
30:2
頁次:
頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:
論旨準則
;
結果句
;
吸收
;
隱藏
;
詞彙功能語法
;
控管
;
θ-criterion
;
Linking
;
Resultatives
;
LFG
;
Absorb
;
Suppress
;
Control
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
22
點閱:170
Carrier and Randall(1992)對英語結果句的分析與Li(1995)對漢語結果複合詞的分析有一個顯著的共通點,就是對於論旨準則(θ-Criterion)的從寬解釋,允許一個句法論元獲得一個以上的論旨角色。本文贊同以上兩篇論文所提出的詞組結構及論旨結構分析,但堅決認為不應且無須犧牲論旨角色與句法功能一對一的連結關係。本文所提出的分析以詞彙功能語法(LFG)中的彙照映理論(LMT)為理論基礎,以功能結構為句法訊息之核心,連結論旨結構與詞組結構。對漢語結果複合詞的分析利用了論旨角色吸收(absorb)或隱藏(suppress)的概念,英語的分析則利用了功能控管(control)的概念;兩者都是句法理論中既有、普遍且合理的概念。
以文找文
This paper challenges one prominent common feature in Carrier and Randall’s (1992) account of English resultative constructions and Li’s (1995) account of Chinese resultative compounds: a weakening of the θ-Criterion by allowing more than one theta role to be assigned to an argument position. While accepting the argument structures and the constituent structures these two papers have argued for, this paper demonstrates that strict one-to-one argument-function linking should not and need not be relaxed and how it is maintained in an account formulated in a simplified lexical mapping theory of LFG, where a feature structure interfaces between the constituent structure and the argument structure. The account of Chinese resultatives hinges upon role suppression, a notion independently motivated; the account of English resultatives relies on functional control, also an independently motivated notion.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Bresnan, J.(1994)。Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar。Language,70(1),72-131。
2.
Bresnan, Joan、Moshi, Lioba(1990)。Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax。Linguistic Inquiry,21(2),147-185。
3.
Bresnan, Joan、Kanerva, Johni M.(1989)。Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar。Linguistic Inquiry,20(1),1-50。
4.
Huang, Chu-Ren(19930400)。Mandarin Chinese and the Lexical Mapping Theory--A Study of the Interaction of Morphology and argument Changing。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,62(2),337-388。
5.
張寧(20040100)。Move is Remerge。語言暨語言學,5(1),189-209。
延伸查詢
6.
Keenan, Edward Louis、Comrie, Bernard(1977)。Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar。Linguistic Inquiry,8(1),63-100。
7.
Li, Yafei(1990)。On V-V compounds in Chinese。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,8(2),177-207。
8.
Carrier, Jill、Randall, Janet H.(1992)。The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives。Linguistic Inquiry,23(3),173-234。
9.
Dowty, David R.(1991)。Thematic proto-roles and argument selection。Language,67(3),547-619。
10.
吳靜慧(20040100)。On de/bu and the Syntactic Nature of Resultative Verbal Compounding。語言暨語言學,5(1),271-329。
11.
Hovav, Malka Rappaport、Levin, Beth(2001)。An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives。Language,77(4),766-797。
12.
Li, Yafei(1995)。The thematic hierarchy and causativity。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,13(2),255-282。
13.
Babby, Leonard(1989)。Subjectlessness, external subcategorization, and the Projection Principle。Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju I lingvistiku,32,7-40。
14.
何萬順(2003)。Chinese inversion constructions within a simplified LMT。Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph,19。
15.
Hoekstra, Teun(1998)。Small clause results。Lingua,74(2/3),101-139。
16.
Nornstein, Norbert(1998)。Movement and chains。Syntax,1(2),99-127。
17.
Levin, Beth、Rappaport, Malka(1986)。The formation of adjective passives。Linguistic Inquiry,17,623-661。
會議論文
1.
何萬順(2005)。Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin Chinese : A lexical mapping account。Harvard University。
2.
Huang, Chu-Ren、林甫雯(1992)。Composite event structure and complex predicates: A template-based approach to argument selection。Bloomington, IN。90-108。
3.
Rappaport, Tova R.(1986)。Nonverbal predication in Hebrew。
學位論文
1.
Verspoor, Cornelia Maria(1997)。Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics(博士論文)。University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh。
2.
黃正德(1982)。Logical Structures in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar。
3.
Chung, Karen Steffen(2004)。Mandarin Compound Verbs。
圖書
1.
Emonds, Joseph E.(1985)。Dordrecht:Foris。
2.
Shieber, Stuart(1986)。Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar。Stanford, CA:CSLI, Stanford University。
3.
Pesetsky, David M.(1995)。Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades。Cambridge:MIT Press。
4.
Levin, Beth、University of Chicago(1993)。English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation。Chicago, IIl。
5.
Levin, Beth、Hovav, Malka Rappaport(1995)。Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface。MIT Press。
6.
Radford, Andrew(2004)。Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
7.
何萬順(19970000)。Interaction and Variation in the Chinese Vo Construction。臺北市:文鶴。
延伸查詢
8.
Grimshaw, Jane B.(1990)。Argument Structure。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
9.
Chomsky, Noam(1982)。Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。
10.
Chomsky, Noam(1981)。Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures。Foris Publications。
11.
Pustejovsky, James(1995)。The Generative Lexicon。MIT Press。
12.
Ackerman, Farrell(1992)。Complex predicates and morpholexical relatedness: Locative alternation in Hungarian。Lexical Matters。Stanford。
13.
Alsina, Alex(1996)。The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance。The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance。Stanford, CA。
14.
Alsina, Alex、Mchombo, Sam A.(1993)。Object asymmetries and the Chichewa applicative construction。Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar。Stanford, CA。
15.
Bresnan, Joan(2001)。Lexical-Funcational Syntax。Oxford。
16.
Bresnan, Joan、Kanerva, Jonni(1992)。The thematic hierarchy and locative inversion in UG: A reply to Shachter‘s comments。Syntax and Semantics: Syntax and the Lexicon。New York, NY。
17.
Bresnan, Joan、Zaenen, Annie(1990)。Deep unaccusativity in LFG。Grammatical Relations: A Cross-theoretical Perspective。Stanford, CA。
18.
Dalrymple, Mary(2001)。Lexical-Functional Gramma。Lexical-Functional Gramma。New York, NY。
19.
Falk, Yehuda(2001)。Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Constraint-based Syntax。Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Constraint-based Syntax。Stanford, CA。
20.
Hornstein, Norbert(2001)。M! A Minimalist Theory of Construal。M! A Minimalist Theory of Construal。Oxford。
21.
Kayne, Richard S.(1985)。Principles of participle constructions。Grammatical representation。Foris。
22.
Kratzer, Angelika(2004)。Building resultativess。Grammatical representation。Foris。
23.
Sells, P.(1986)。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories。Stanford, CA。
24.
Simpson, Jane(1991)。Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach。Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach。Dordrecht。
25.
Wechsler, Stephen(1997)。Resultative predicates and control。Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The Syntax and Semantics of Predication。Austin, TX。
26.
Zaenen, Annie、Engdahl, Elizabeth(1994)。Descriptive and theoretical syntax in the lexicon。Conceptual Approaches to the Lexicon。Oxford。
其他
1.
Ackerman, Farrell,Moore, John(2001)。Dowtyian proto-properties and Lexical Mapping Theory,Hong Kong。
2.
Alsina, Alex(1996)。Resultatives: A joint operation of semantic and syntactic structures。
3.
Fontanals, Jaume Mateu(2002)。The DOR regained: Evidence from English and Dutch,Reykjavik, Iceland。
4.
Francez, Nissim,Wintner, Shuly(2003)。Unificatuion Grammars。
5.
McCloskey, James(1999)。On the distribution of subject properties in Irish。
圖書論文
1.
Lødrup, Helge(2000)。Underspecification in Lexical Mapping Theory: The case of Norwegian existentials and resultatives。Argument Realization。Stanford, CA:CSLI Publications。
2.
Kaplan, Ronald M.、Bresnan, Joan(1982)。Lexical-functional Grammar: A formal System for Grammatical Representation。The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
3.
Simpson, Jane(1983)。Resultatives。Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar。Bloomington, Indiana:University Linguistics Club。
4.
Chomsky, Noam(2000)。Minimalist inquiries: the framework。Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik。MIT Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Patient-subject Constructions in Chinese
2.
漢語疑問副詞原位與前置的非移位製圖範本闡釋
3.
On Some Mysteries, Asymmetries and Derivation of Potential de Construction in Chinese
4.
Transitivity and Two-way V-O Compound Verbs in Mandarin Chinese
5.
運用學習者語料庫探討學生譯文的被動語態和形容詞子句
6.
On Jim Huang's Idea of Macro-Parameters
7.
談動後模態結構:從客語模態「得」字句談起
8.
Free Alternation? A Study on Grammatical Packaging of Excessive Predication in Mandarin Chinese
9.
Hao-De-Xia-Ren: The Grammatical Property of De in Mandarin V-De-C Construction
10.
漢語結果補語語義結構習得研究
11.
Unifying the Long Passive and the Short Passive: On the Bei Construction in Taiwan Mandarin
12.
Experientiality and Reversibility of the Aspectual Morpheme Guo in Mandarin Chinese: Temporal and Atemporal Perspectives
13.
漢語動賓式離合詞之習得研究--以「投票」和「畢業」為例
14.
Three Types of Semantic Opacity and Their Challenge to Teachers of Chinese
15.
The Syntactic Grounding and Conceptualization of Hakka BUN and LAU
1.
主觀化與義務情態動詞的形成:以閩南語「著」、「愛」、「會」為例
2.
客語輕動詞邊緣地貌圖
3.
漢語複雜疑問詞研究:以運符約束為本之分析
4.
客語潛能補語構式之事件概念與論元體現:認知模型與構式理論之整合
1.
Mandarin Compound Verbs
2.
Verb-Copying in Chinese Revisited
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code